Behavioral verification of associative learning in whisker-related fear conditioning in mice

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis

Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology

Polish Neuroscience Society

Subject: Behavioral Sciences , Biomedical Sciences & Nutrition , Life Sciences , Medicine , Neurosciences

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 0065-1400
eISSN: 1689-0035

DESCRIPTION

22
Reader(s)
64
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 76 , ISSUE 2 (June 2016) > List of articles

Advertisement Behavioral verification of associative learning in whisker-related fear conditioning in mice

Anita Cybulska-Kłosowicz *

Keywords : vibrissae, barrel cortex, delay conditioning, conditioned reaction, freezing

Citation Information : Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 87-97, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ane-2017-008

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 13-November-2015 / Accepted: 24-April-2016 / Published Online: 25-July-2017

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Fear-conditioning is one of the most widely used paradigms in attempts to unravel the processes and mechanisms underlying learning and plasticity. In most Pavlovian conditioning paradigms an auditory stimulus is used as the conditioned stimulus (CS), but conditioning to a tactile CS can also be accomplished. The whisker-to-barrel tactile system in mice offers a convenient way to investigate the brain pathways and mechanisms of learning and plasticity of the cerebral cortex. To support the claim that an animal learns during conditioning sessions and that the resulting plastic changes are associative in nature, objective measures of behavior are necessary. Multiple types of conditioned responses can develop depending on the training situation, CS and unconditioned stimulus (UCS) characteristics. These include physiological responses such as salivation, heart rate, and galvanic skin reaction, and also behavioral responses such as startle reflex potentiation or suppression of an ongoing behavior. When studying learning with the whisker system in behaving mice, stimulation of individual whiskers in a well-controlled manner may require animal restraint, which has the disadvantage of limiting the observation of potential behavioral responses. Stimulation of whiskers in a neck-restraining apparatus evokes head movements. When whisker stimulation (CS) is paired with an aversive UCS during conditioning, the number of head movements decrease in the course of the training. This reaction, called minifreezing, resembles the frequently used behavioral measure known as the freezing response. However, this is only applicable for freely moving animals. This article will review experimental evidence confirming that minifreezing is a relevant index of association formation between the neutral CS and aversive UCS.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. Allen CB, Celikel T, Feldman DE (2003) Long-term depression induced by sensory deprivation during cortical map plasticity in vivo. Nat Neurosci 6: 291–299.
  2. Armstrong-James M, Diamond ME, Ebner FF (1994) An innocuous bias in whisker use in adult rats modifies receptive fields of barrel cortex neurons. J Neurosci 14: 6978–6991.
  3. Baldi E, Lorenzini CA, Bucherelli C (2004) Footshock intensity and generalization in contextual and auditory-cued fear conditioning in the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 81: 162–166.
  4. Barnéoud P, Gyger M, Andrés F, van der Loos H (1991) Vibrissa-related behavior in mice: transient effect of ablation of the barrel cortex. Behav Brain Res 44(1): 87–99.
  5. Bender VA, Bender KJ, Brasier DJ, Feldman DE (2006) Two Coincidence Detectors for Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Somatosensory Cortex. J Neurosci 26(16): 4166–4177.
  6. Benedetti BL, Glazewski S, Barth AL (2009) Reliable and precise neuronal firing during sensory plasticity in superficial layers of primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 29: 11817–11827.
  7. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC (1969) Passive and active reactions to fear-‑eliciting stimuli. J Comp Physiol Psychol 68(1): 129–135.
  8. Bolles RC, Fanselow MS (1980) A perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain. Behav Brain Sci 3: 291–301.
  9. Bolles RC, Fanselow MS (1982) Endorphins and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 33: 87–101.
  10. Brown JS, Kalish HI, Farber IE (1951) Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus. J Exp Psychol 41: 317–332.
  11. Cason H (1922) The conditioned eyelid reaction. J Exp Psychol 5: 153–196.
  12. Chau LS, Prakapenka AV, Zendeli L, Davis AS, Galvez R (2014) Training-‑dependent associative learning induced neocortical structural plasticity: a trace eyeblink conditioning analysis. PLoS One 9(4): e95317.
  13. Clark GA, McCormick DA, Lavond DG, Thompson RF (1984) Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses. Brain Res 291(1): 125–136.
  14. Clem RL, Barth A (2006) Pathway-specific trafficking of native AMPARs by in vivo experience. Neuron 49: 663–670.
  15. Collier AC, Bolles RC (1980) The ontogenesis of defensive reactions to shock in preweanling rats. Dev Psychobiol 13(2): 141–150.
  16. Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Brzezicka A, Zakrzewska R, Kossut M (2013a) Correlated activation of the thalamocortical network in a simple learning paradigm. Behav Brain Res 252: 293–301.
  17. Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Kossut M (2001) Mice can learn roughness discrimination with vibrissae in a jump stand apparatus. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 61(1): 73–76.
  18. Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Kossut M (2006) Early-phase of learning enhances communication between brain hemispheres. Eur J Neurosci 24(5): 1470–1476.
  19. Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Posluszny A, Nowak K, Siucinska E, Kossut M, Liguz-‑Lecznar M (2013b) Interneurons containing somatostatin are affected by learning-induced cortical plasticity. Neuroscience 254: 18–25.
  20. Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Zakrzewska R, Kossut M (2009) Brain activation patterns during classical conditioning with appetitive or aversive UCS. Behav Brain Res 204(1): 102–111.
  21. Davis CM, Riley AL (2010) Conditioned taste aversion learning: implications for animal models of drug abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1187: 247–275.
  22. Davis RL (2004) Olfactory learning. Neuron 44(1): 31–48.
  23. Diamond DM, Weinberger NM (1986) Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields. Brain Res 372(2): 357–360.
  24. Diamond ME, Armstrong-James M, Ebner FF (1993) Experience-dependent plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 2082–2086.
  25. Diamond ME, Huang W, Ebner FF (1994) Laminar comparison of somatosensory cortical plasticity. Science 265: 1885–1888.
  26. Fanselow MS (1980) Conditioned and unconditional components of post-‑shock freezing. Pavlov J Biol Sci 15: 177–182.
  27. Fanselow MS (2000) Contextual fear, gestalt memories, and the hippocampus. Behavioural Brain Research 110: 73–81.
  28. Fanselow MS, Bolles RC (1979) Naloxone and shock-eliciting freezing in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93: 736–744.
  29. Fanselow MS, Lester LS (1988) A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In: Evolution and learning (Bolles RC, Beecher MD, Eds.), Hillsdale, New York, USA. p. 185.
  30. Fanselow MS, Poulos AM (2005) The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning. Annu Rev Psychol 56: 207–234.
  31. Feldmeyer D, Brecht M, Helmchen F, Petersen CC, Poulet JF, Staiger JF, Luhmann HJ, Schwarz C (2013) Barrel cortex function. Prog Neurobiol 103: 3–27.
  32. Fox K, Daw N, Sato H, Czepita D (1992) The Effect of Visual Experience on Development of NMDA Receptor Synaptic Transmission in Kitten Visual Cortex. J Neurosci 12(7): 2672–2684.
  33. Freeman JH, Steinmetz AB (2011) Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning. Learn Mem 18: 666–677.
  34. Galambos R, Sheatz G, Vernier VG (1956) Electrophysiological correlates of a conditioned response in cats. Science 123: 376–377.
  35. Galvez R, Cua S, Disterhoft JF (2011) Age-related deficits in a forebrain-‑dependent task, trace-eyeblink conditioning. Neurobiol Aging 32(10): 1915–1922.
  36. Galvez R, Weible AP, Disterhoft JF (2007) Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning. Learn Mem 14(1): 94–100.
  37. Galvez R, Weiss C, Cua S, Disterhoft J (2009) A novel method for precisely timed stimulation of mouse whiskers in a freely moving preparation: Application for delivery of the conditioned stimulus in trace eyeblink conditioning. J Neurosci Methods 177: 434–439.
  38. Galvez R, Weiss C, Weible AP, Disterhoft JF (2006) Vibrissa-signaled eyeblink conditioning induces somatosensory cortical plasticity. J Neurosci 26(22): 6062–6068.
  39. Gdalyahu A, Tring E, Polack PO, Gruver R, Golshani P, Fanselow MS, Silva AJ, Trachtenberg JT (2012) Associative fear learning enhances sparse network coding in primary sensory cortex. Neuron 75(1): 121–132.
  40. Gierdalski M, Jablonska B, Siucinska E, Lech M, Skibinska A, Kossut M (2001) Rapid regulation of GAD67 mRNA and protein level in cortical neurons after sensory learning. Cereb Cortex 11(9): 806–815.
  41. Glazewski S, McKenna M, Mark Jacquin M and Fox K (1998) Experience-‑dependent depression of vibrissae responses in adolescent rat barrel cortex. Eur J Neurosci 10(6): 2107–2116.
  42. Gormezano I, Schneiderman N, Deaux EG, Fuentes I (1962) Nictitating membrane: classical conditioning and extinction in the albino rabbit. Science 138: 33–34.
  43. Grant DA, Schneider DE (1949) Intensity of the Conditioned Stimulus and Strength of Conditioning: II. The Conditioned Galvanic Skin Response to an Auditory Stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39(1): 35.
  44. Gruart A, Blazquez P, Delgado-Garcia JM (1995) Kinematics of spontaneous, reflex, and conditioned eyelid movements in the alert cat. J Neurophysiol 74: 226–248.
  45. Guic-Robles E, Valdivieso C, Guajardo G (1989) Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system. Behav Brain Res 31(3): 285–289.
  46. Hall WG (1979) Feeding and behavioral activation in infant rats. Science 205: 206–209.
  47. Halverson HE, Hubbard EM, Freeman JH (2009) Stimulation of the lateral geniculate, superior colliculus, or visual cortex is sufficient for eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learn Mem 16(5): 300–307.
  48. Harris JA, Petersen RS, Diamond ME (1999) Distribution of tactile learning and its neural basis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 7587–7591.
  49. Hutson KA, Masterton RB (1986) The sensory contribution of a single vibrissa’s cortical barrel. J Neurophysiol 56(4): 1196–1223.
  50. Jakuczyn W, Kublik E, Wojcik D, Wróbel A (2005) Local classifiers for evoked potentials recorded from behaving rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 65: 425–434.
  51. Jasinska M, Grzegorczyk A, Jasek E, Litwin JA, Kossut M, Barbacka-‑Surowiak G, Pyza E (2014) Daily rhythm of synapse turnover in mouse somatosensory cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 74: 104–110.
  52. Jasinska M, Siucinska E, Cybulska-Klosowicz A, Pyza E, Furness DN, Kossut M, Glazewski S (2010) Rapid, learning-induced inhibitory synaptogenesis in murine barrel field. J Neurosci 30(3): 1176–1184.
  53. Johansen JP, Wolff SB, Lüthi A, LeDoux JE (2012) Controlling the elements: an optogenetic approach to understanding the neural circuits of fear. Biol Psychiatry 71(12): 1053–1060.
  54. Kamprath K, Wotjak CT (2004) Nonassociative learning processes determine expression and extinction of conditioned fear in mice. Learn Mem 11: 770–786.
  55. Kublik E (2004) Contextual impact on sensory processing at the barrel cortex of awake rat. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 64(2): 229–238.
  56. Kuhlman SJ, O’Connor DH, Fox K, Svoboda K (2014) Structural plasticity within the barrel cortex during initial phases of whisker-dependent learning. J Neurosci 34(17): 6078–6083.
  57. Landers MS, Sullivan RM (1999) Vibrissae-Evoked Behavior and Conditioning before Functional Ontogeny of the Somatosensory Vibrissae Cortex. J Neurosci. 19(12): 5131–5137.
  58. Leaton RN, Borszcz GS (1985) Potentiated startle: Its relation to freezing and shock intensity in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 11: 421–428.
  59. Liguz-Lecznar M, Lehner M, Kaliszewska A, Zakrzewska R, Sobolewska A, Kossut M (2014) Altered glutamate/GABA equilibrium in aged mice cortex influences cortical plasticity. Brain Struct Funct 220(3): 1681–1693.
  60. Martin GK, Fitzgerald RD (1980) Heart rate and somatomotor activity in rats during signalled escape and yoked classical conditioning. Physiol Behav 25: 519–526.
  61. Mauk MD, Thompson RF (1987) Retention of classically conditioned eyelid responses following acute decerebration. Brain Res 403(1): 89–95.
  62. Mayrhofer JM, Skreb V, von der Behrens W, Musall S, Weber B, Haiss F (2013) Novel two-alternative forced choice paradigm for bilateral vibrotactile whisker frequency discrimination in head-fixed mice and rats. J Neurophysiol 109(1): 273–284.
  63. McCormick DA, Clark GA, Lavond DG, Thompson RF (1982) Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79: 2731–2735.
  64. Misslin R (2003) The defense system of fear: behavior and neurocircuitry. Neurophysiol Clin 33(2): 55–66.
  65. Morris RW, Bouton ME (2006) Effect of unconditioned stimulus magnitude on the emergence of conditioned responding. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 32(4): 371–385.
  66. Musial P, Kublik E, Panecki SJ, Wróbel A (1998) Transient changes of electrical activity in the rat barrel cortex during conditioning. Brain Res 786(1–2): 1–10.
  67. O’Connor DH, Peron, Huber D, Svoboda K (2010) Neural Activity in Barrel Cortex Underlying Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Mice. Neuron 67: 1048–1061.
  68. Papini MR, Bitterman ME (1990) The role of contingency in classical conditioning. Psychol Rev 97(3): 396–403.
  69. Petro N, Gruss LF, Yin S, Huang H, Ding M, Keil A (2015) Relating BOLD and ssVEPs during visual aversive conditioning using concurrent EEG-fMRI recordings. J Vis 15(12): 457.
  70. Posluszny A, Liguz-Lecznar M, Turzynska D, Zakrzewska R, Bielecki M, Kossut M (2015) Learning-dependent plasticity of the barrel cortex is impaired by restricting GABA-ergic transmission. PLoS One 10(12): e0144415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144415.
    [CROSSREF]
  71. Radwanska A, Debowska W, Liguz-Lecznar M, Brzezicka A, Kossut M, Cybulska-Klosowicz A (2010) Involvement of retrosplenial cortex in classical conditioning. Behav Brain Res 214(2): 231–239.
  72. Ramos JMJ (2014) Perirhinal cortex lesions attenuate stimulus generalization in a tactual discrimination task in rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 74(1): 15–25.
  73. Rescorla RA (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev 74(1): 71–80.
  74. Rescorla RA (1988a) Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. Annu Rev Neurosci 1: 329–352.
  75. Rescorla RA (1988b) Pavlovian conditioning. Am Psychol 43: 151–160.
  76. Rosen JB, Schulkin J (1998) From normal fear to pathological anxiety. Psychol Rev 105(2): 325–350.
  77. Rosselet C, Fieschi M, Hugues S, Bureau I (2011) Associative learning changes the organization of functional excitatory circuits targeting the supragranular layers of mouse barrel cortex. Front Neural Circuits 4: 126.
  78. Schneiderman N, Fuentes I, Gormezano I (1962). Acquisition and extinction of the classically conditioned eyelid response in the albino rabbit. Science 136: 650–652.
  79. Sigmundi RA, Bouton ME, Bolles RC (1980) Conditioned freezing in the rat as a function of shock intensity and CS modality. Bull Psychonom Soc 15(4): 254–256.
  80. Siucinska E (2006) GAD67-positive puncta: contributors to learning-dependent plasticity in the barrel cortex of adult mice. Brain Res 1106(1): 52–62.
  81. Siucinska E, Kossut M (1996) Short-lasting classical conditioning induces reversible changes of representational maps of vibrissae in mouse SI cortex-a 2DG study. Cereb Cortex 6(3): 506–513.
  82. Siucinska E, Kossut M (2006) Short-term sensory learning does not alter parvalbumin neurons in the barrel cortex of adult mice: a double-labeling study. Neuroscience 138(2): 715–724.
  83. Siucinska E, Kossut M, Stewart MG (1999) GABA immunoreactivity in mouse barrel field after aversive and appetitive classical conditioning training involving facial vibrissae. Brain Res 843(1–2): 62–70.
  84. Sullivan RM, Landers MS, Flemming J, Vaught C, Young TA, Polan HJ (2003) Characterizing the functional significance of the neonatal rat vibrissae prior to the onset of whisking. Somatosens Motor Res 20(2): 157–162.
  85. Thompson RF (2005) In Search of Memory Traces. Annual Review of Psychology 56: 1–23.
  86. Tokarski K, Urban-Ciecko J, Kossut M, Hess G (2007) Sensory learning-‑induced enhancement of inhibitory synaptic transmission in the barrel cortex of the mouse. Eur J Neurosci 26(1): 134–141.
  87. Trigo JA, Gruart A, Delgado-Garcia JM (1999) Discharge profiles of abducens, accessory abducens, and orbicularis oculi motoneurons during reflex and conditioned blinks in alert cats. J Neurophysiol 81: 1666–1684.
  88. Troncoso J, Múnera A, Delgado-García JM (2004) Classical conditioning of eyelid and mystacial vibrissae responses in conscious mice. Learn Mem 11: 724–726.
  89. Urban-Ciecko J, Kossut M, Mozrzymas JW (2010) Sensory learning differentially affects GABAergic tonic currents in excitatory neurons and fast spiking interneurons in layer 4 of mouse barrel cortex. J Neurophysiol 104(2): 746–754.
  90. Wallace H, Fox K (1999) Local cortical interactions determine the form of cortical plasticity. J Neurobiol 41: 58–63.
  91. Weinberger NM (2007a) Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 229(1–2): 54–68.
  92. Weinberger NM (2007b) Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: a synthesis of two disciplines. Learn Mem 14(1–2): 1–16.
  93. Weiss C, Disterhoft JF (2011) Exploring prefrontal cortical memory mechanisms with eyeblink conditioning. Behav Neurosci 125(3): 318–326.
  94. Witnauer JE, Miller RR (2013) Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity. Learn Behav 41(1): 94–106.
  95. Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H (1970) The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex: The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Research 17: 205–238.
  96. Wróbel A, Achimowicz J, Musial P, Kublik E (1995) Rapid phase shift of evoked potentials in barrel cortex accompanies conditioning. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 55: 147.
  97. Wu HP, Ioffe JC, Iverson MM, Boo JM, Dyck RH (2013) Novel, whisker-‑dependent texture discrimination task for mice. Behav Brain Res 237: 238–242.
  98. Yoshimoto M, Nagata K, Miki K (2010) Differential control of renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behavior in conscious rats. American Journal of Physiology 299: R1114–R1120.
  99. Zuo Y, Safaai H, Notaro G, Mazzoni A, Panzeri S, Diamond ME (2015) Complementary Contributions of Spike Timing and Spike Rate to Perceptual Decisions in Rat S1 and S2 Cortex. Curr Biol 25: 357–363.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS