Publications
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment
Silesian University of Technology
Subject: Architecture , Civil Engineering , Engineering, Environmental
ISSN: 1899-0142
SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
COLLABORATIVE HOUSING PERSPECTIVES. DEFINITION, HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND EXAMPLES
Keywords : Collaborative housing, Affordable housing, Housing assembly, Co-housing, Housing cooperative, Housing policy, Housing in Poland, Spatial planning.
Citation Information : Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment. Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 33-44, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2017-049
License : (BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Published Online: 28-August-2018
- ARTICLE
- FIGURES & TABLES
- REFERENCES
- EXTRA FILES
- COMMENTS
ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
This paper is a continuation of the paper entitled “Collaborative Housing Perspectives in Poland. Definition, Historical Overview and Examples” and it describes the possibilities of implementation of collaborative housing in Polish conditions. In the paper, apart from legal constraints, the author also describes the benefits of collaborative housing, because as far as benefits of building homes in the construction group system, co-operative or co-housing seem to be quite well diagnosed for the inhabitants, the benefits for the city - which, based on the author's studies, are huge - are not described well enough.
FIGURES & TABLES
REFERENCES
[1] Bianchetti, C., Sampieri, A. (2014). Can shared practices build a new City? Journal of architecture and urbanism, 38(1), 73-79.
[2] Coudroy de Lille, L., (2015). Housing cooperatives in Poland. The origins of a deadlock. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 17-31. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011424.
[3] Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 79-92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.
[CROSSREF]
[4] Jarvis, H. (2015). Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: evidence from the UK, USA and Australia. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 93-105.
[5] Kaasa, A. (2016). Cohabitation: against the tabula rasa and towards a new ethic for cities Paper for the 2016 United Nations Habitat III conference on sustainable cities, this discussion paper commissioned by the “Charter of Quito” (https://www.academia.edu/28623660/Cohabitation_Against_the_Tabula_Rasa_and_Towards_a_New_Ethic_for_Cities, acess 03.20117)
[6] Labus, A. (2016). Senior cohousing in cross-cutting research. Architecture, Civil engineering, Environment, 9(4), 21-31.
[7] Leviten-Reid C., Lake, A. (2016). Building Affordable Rental Housing for Seniors: Policy Insights From Canada. Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 30(3), bll, 253-270. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/027638 93.2016.1198738 [Toegang verkry April 6, 2017].
[8] Ring, K. (2013). Selfmade City : Berlin : Stadtgestaltung und Wohnprojekte in Eigeninitiative, Berlin: Jovis.
[9] Ruiu, M. L. (2015). The Social Capital of Cohousing Communities. Sociology.
[10] Tornow, B., Skok H., Fedrowitz, M., (2015). Europe co-operative housing, Berlin: Jovis.
[11] Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 64-78.
[12] Sacała, S. (2014). Zwarte miasto Katowice. Typologia ubytków w tkance miejskiej na przykładzie śródmieścia Katowic wraz z modelowymi rozwiązaniami zabudowy uzupełniającej. MSc thesis under the supervision of dr inż. arch. Agata Twardoch, 2013/2014. The thesis was awarded a distinction by TUP [Polish Urban Planner Association] in the best graduation thesis competition.