A survey of retention and retainer practices of orthodontists in Australia

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480

DESCRIPTION

0
Reader(s)
0
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 35 , ISSUE 2 (November 2019) > List of articles

A survey of retention and retainer practices of orthodontists in Australia

Maurice J. Meade * / Craig W Dreyer

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 174-183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-047

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Published Online: 20-July-2021

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Objective: To survey retention and retainer practices of orthodontists in Australia.

Methods: A pilot-tested e-survey was distributed to 502 eligible members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO). The questions addressed participant background information, preferred retainer and retention practices, retainer characteristics and factors influencing retainer choice. Statistical analyses were performed using PASWH version 18.

Results: The response rate was 58%. Thermoplastic retainers (TRs) were the most commonly chosen retainer in the maxilla (39.4%) and bonded retainers (BRs) were most commonly chosen in the mandible (38.5%). An initial period of full-time wear of removable retainers (RRs) was prescribed by 37.7–48.3%. ‘Night/sleeping with reducing frequency over time’ was the most commonly prescribed part-time RR wear practice (28.1–33.5%). Indefinite retainer wear was recommended by 85.3–87.4% of orthodontists. Indefinite retainer checks were carried out by 19.1–19.8% of orthodontists while 28.9–43.6% were ‘not happy’ for general dental practitioners (GDPs) to continue retention checks. Adjunctive retention practices were used by 25.6–72.8%. Pre-fabrication TR sheet thickness of 1.0 mm (68%) and polypropylene co-polymer/ethylene material type (55.8%) were most commonly used. Vacuum-forming was the preferred mode of TR fabrication by 48.4%. ‘Stainless steel single strand round’ was the most commonly used BR material type (33.4%). BR bonded to 12-22 (bonded to four teeth) was the most common BR design in the maxilla (48.8%) and 33-43 (bonded to six teeth) was most commonly chosen for the mandible (81.5%). Inadvertent tooth movement associated with BRs was observed by 62%. The orthodontist factor that most influenced retainer choice was the nature of the pretreatment malocclusion (88%).

Conclusion: Although there is agreement that retention is indefinite, orthodontic retention practices and retainer characteristics vary considerably between orthodontists in Australia. Greater communication between orthodontists and GDPs is required to effectively manage retention over the long term.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

1. Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;1:CD002283.

2. Al-Moghrabi D, Pandis N, Fleming PS. The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2016;17:24.

3. Wong PM, Freer TJ. A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Orthod J 2004;20:99-106.

4. Singh P, Grammati S, Kirschen R. Orthodontic retention patterns in the United Kingdom. J Orthod 2009;36:115-21.

5. Renkema AM, Sips ET, Bronkhorst E, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:432-7.

6. Valiathan M, Hughes E. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;137:170-7.

7. Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Lindstrom AF. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011;140:196-201.

8. Lai CS, Grossen JM, Renkema AM, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS, Katsaros C. Orthodontic retention procedures in Switzerland. Swiss Dent J 2013;124:655-61.

9. Meade MJ, Millett D. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists. J Orthod 2013;40:318-25.

10. Vandevska-Radunovic V, Espeland L, Stenvik A. Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists. Orthodontics (Chic) 2013;14:e110-7.

11. Paşaoğlu A, Aras I, Mert A, Aras A. Survey on retention protocols among Turkish orthodontists. Turk J Orthod 2016;29:51-8.

12. Al-Jewair TS, Hamidaddin MA, Alotaibi HM, Alqahtani ND, Albarakati SF, Alkofide EA et al. Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2016;37:895-901.

13. Andriekute A, Vasiliauskas A, Sidlauskas A. A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention. Prog Orthod 2017;18:31.

14. Padmos JA, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2018;153:496-504.

15. Padmos J, Mei L, Wouters C, Renkema AM. Orthodontic retention procedures in New Zealand: A survey to benefit clinical practice guideline development. J World Fed Orthod 2019. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.12.003

16. Miles P. 2013 survey of Australian orthodontists’ procedures. Aust Orthod J 2013;29:170-5.

17. Meade MJ, Millett DT. Bonded retainers: a narrative review. Dent Update (In press).

18. Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J 2017;62 Suppl 1:51-7.

19. Kotecha S, Gale S, Khamashta-Ledezma L, Scott J, Seedat M, Storey M et al. A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention. Br Dent J 2015;218:649-53.

20. Edwards JG. A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:380-7.

21. Aasen TO, Espeland L. An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:209-14.

22. Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods - a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:345-53.

23. Meade MJ, Millett DT. Vacuum-formed retainers: an overview. Dent Update 2015;42:24-6, 28-30, 33-4.

24. Zhu Y, Lin J, Long H, Ye N, Huang R, Yang X et al. Comparison of survival time and comfort between 2 clear overlay retainers with different thicknesses: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2017;151:433-9.

25. Dental  Board  of  Australia  statistics.  Viewed  September  2019,  <https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/About-the-Board/Statistics.aspx>

26. Williams A. How to… Write and analyse a questionnaire. J Orthod 2003;30:245-52.

27. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42:625-40.

28. Ab Rahman N, Low TF, Idris NS. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:36-41.

29. Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:453-61.

30. Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, Hollinghurst S, Ewings P, Clark S et al. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:372-8.

31. Meade MJ, Millett DT, Cronin M. Social perceptions of orthodontic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:649-56.

32. Manzon L, Fratto G, Rossi E, Buccheri A. Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2018;153:852-60.

33. Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P et al. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:730-7.

34. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2018;40:387-98.

35. McDermott P, Field D, Erfida I, Millett D. Operator and patient experiences with fixed or vacuum-formed retainers. In: Irish Division IADR Conference Abstract 0017. J Dent Res 2008;87:(Spec Iss B). IADR/CADR 86th General Session,Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

36. Sandhya V, Arun AV, Mahendra S, Chandrashekar B, Shetty B, Mahesh CM et al. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists in India. J World Fed Orthod 2019;8:64-7.

37. McDermott P, Cronin M, Doubleday B, Erfida I. Lower arch retention: A randomised clinical trial of bonded versus vacuumformed retainers. In: European Orthodontic Society 89th Congress, Iceland, 2013: E139 Abstract. 2013.

38. Al-Moghrabi D, Johal A, O’Rourke N, Donos N, Pandis N, Gonzales-Marin C et al. Effects of fixed vs removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2018;154:167-74.

39. Storey M, Forde K, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2018:40;399-408.

40. Millett D, McDermott P, Field D et al. Dental and periodontal health with bonded or vacuum-formed retainer. In IADR Conference Abstract 3168. J Dent Res 2008; 87: (Spec Iss B). IADR/CADR 86th General Session, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

41. Gill DS, Naini FB, Jones A, Tredwin CJ. Part-time versus fulltime retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial. World J Orthod 2007;8:300-6.

42. Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. The Eur J Orthod 2009;32:1-5.

43. Shawesh M, Bhatti B, Usmani T, Mandall N. Hawley retainers full-or part-time? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2009;32:165- 70.

44. Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers—a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:475-9.

45. Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods—a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:345-53.

46. Wouters C, Lamberts A, Kuijpers Jagtman A, Renkema A. Development of a clinical practice guideline for orthodontic retention. Orthod Craniofacl Res 2019;22:69-80.

47. Meade MJ, Weston A, Dreyer CW. Valid consent and orthodontic treatment. Aust Orthod J 2019;35:35-45.

48. Mai W, Meng H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Li M, Yuan K et al. Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:720-7.

49. Raja TA, Littlewood SJ, Munyombwe T, Bubb NL. Wear resistance of four types of vacuum-formed retainer materials: a laboratory study. Angle Orthod 2014;84:656-64.

50. Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:728-37.

51. Zachrisson BU. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:724-7.

52. Kučera J, Marek I. Unexpected complications associated with mandibular fixed retainers: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:202-11.

53. Al-Moghrabi D, Colonio Salazar FB, Johal A, Fleming PS. Factors influencing adherence to vacuum-formed retainer wear: A qualitative study. J Orthod 2019;46:212-9.

54. Bech M, Kristensen MB. Differential response rates in postal and Web-based surveys in older respondents. Surv Rese Methods 2009;3:1-6.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS