The public perception of orthodontic treatment performed by general dentists and specialist orthodontists


Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine


ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480





Volume / Issue / page

Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 34 , ISSUE 2 (November 2018) > List of articles

The public perception of orthodontic treatment performed by general dentists and specialist orthodontists

Morgan Wishney * / Oyku Dalci * / Peter Petocz * / M. Ali Darendeliler *

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 232-238, DOI:

License : (CC-BY-4.0)

Published Online: 20-July-2021



Background: In Australia, orthodontic treatment may be performed by either a general dental practitioner (GDP) or a specialist orthodontist. However, the titles ‘specialist’ and ‘orthodontist’ are restricted to dentists who have undertaken an additional three years of full-time training in an accredited institution. Considering the increase in popularity of GDP orthodontic courses, an assessment was worthwhile of the public’s understanding of the difference between a specialist orthodontist and a GDP who provides orthodontic treatment.

Methods: Two thousand and six Australian adults registered with a survey organisation and completed an online questionnaire. Participants were chosen to reflect age and state demographic data provided by the 2016 Australian Census. The survey questions examined the respondents’ understanding regarding the difference between a GDP and a specialist orthodontist related to training and qualifications. Furthermore, factors influencing respondents’ preferences for choosing an orthodontic practitioner as well as demographic data were collected.

Results: Sixty-six percent of respondents felt that a dentist who provided orthodontic treatment must also be a specialist orthodontist whilst 27% were unsure. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that a specialist orthodontist was the most qualified person to provide orthodontic treatment. The most popular factor in deciding which type of practitioner to see for orthodontic treatment was whether they were a specialist, followed closely by cost. A GDP was more likely to be chosen as an orthodontic practitioner by respondents who were male, less educated, had a lower income or had seen a GDP for orthodontic treatment in the past.

Conclusion: Although the respondents generally appeared to appreciate the value of seeing a specialist for orthodontic treatment, a significant proportion did not appear to understand the difference between a specialist orthodontist and a GDP. The present findings support further education of the public.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Singh P. Orthodontic allegations raised against registrants by the General Dental Council. Br Dent J 2016;221:291-4.

2. The Dental Council of New Zealand, 2016. Orthodontic Working Group Report. Wellington, New Zealand. Viewed 23 February 2018, <>

3. Burfitt  J.  Great  expectations.  Bite  Magazine  2015.  Viewed  23  February 2018, <>

4. Vicéns J, Russo A. Comparative use of invisalign® by orthodontists and general practitioners. Angle Orthod 2010;80:425-34.

5. Marques LS, de Freitas Junior N, Pereira LJ, Ramos-Jorge ML. Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists: A blind comparative evaluation. Angle Orthod 2012;82:102-6.

6. Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons 2017. ASPS welcome tighter regulation of cosmetic surgery in Queensland. Viewed 23 February 2018,

7. Shah A, Patel A, Smetona J, Rohrich RJ. Public perception of cosmetic surgeons versus plastic surgeons: Increasing transparency to educate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:544e-57e.

8. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016. 2016 Census QuickStats. Viewed 6 August 2018,

9. Angle EH. Orthodontia as a specialty. Dental Cosmos 1902;44:905-10.

10. Hans MG, Valiathan M. Bobbing for Apples in the Garden of Eden. Semin Orthod 2005;11:86-93.

11. Smith RJ. General practitioners and orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:169-72.

12. Feathersonte T. Why do students enrol in massively oversupplied university degrees? The Sydney Morning Herald. Sydney, Australia: Fairfax Media, 2016.

13. Chate R. Truth or consequences: the potential implications of shortterm cosmetic orthodontics for general dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2013;215:551-3.

14. McGann B. Orthodontics in general practice: 1988. OP Ortho News 1989;1:1-4.

15. Christensen GJ. Orthodontics and the general practitioner. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2002;133:369-371.

16. Chan WC, Ng CH, Yiu BK, Liu CY, Ip CM, Siu HH et al. A survey on the preference for continuing professional dental education amongst general dental practitioners who attended the 26th Asia Pacific Dental Congress. Eur J Dent Educ 2006;10:210-6.

17. Jacobs RM, Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profiling providers of orthodontic services in general dental practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:269-75.

18. Heath EM, English JD, Johnson CD, Swearingen EB, Akyalcin S. Perceptions of orthodontic case complexity among orthodontists, general practitioners, orthodontic residents, and dental students. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:335-41.

19. Abei Y, Nelson S, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome between orthodontists and general dentists with the ABO index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:544-8.

20. Wishney M. Potential risks of orthodontic therapy: a critical review and conceptual framework. Aust Dent J 2017;62:86-96.