Dental age assessment in Caucasian subjects with third molar agenesis

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480

DESCRIPTION

0
Reader(s)
0
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 33 , ISSUE 1 (May 2017) > List of articles

Dental age assessment in Caucasian subjects with third molar agenesis

Elham S. Abu Alhaija * / Aftima A. Derbash / Susan N. Al-Khateeb

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 35-39, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-082

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Published Online: 30-July-2021

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Background: Delayed dental development has been linked with tooth agenesis. Research aimed at dental age estimation in subjects with third molar agenesis has been minimal. Objectives: To investigate the association between dental stage of development and third molar agenesis.

Materials and methods: A total of 700 orthopantomograms (OPTs) were obtained for this study. The age of the subjects ranged from 10 to 16 years (13.66 ± 1.50 years). The subjects were divided into two groups of which group 1 consisted of 350 patients (175 females and 175 males) with third molar agenesis and group 2 (control group) had all third molars present. The control group matched the study group for gender and chronological age (CA). Dental age (DA) was estimated from the OPTs using the Demirjian method for all included subjects.

Results: The mean CA and DA in the third molar agenesis group were 13.81 ± 1.60 years and 13.72 ± 1.65 years, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean CA and DA in the control group were 13.51 ± 1.38 years and 14.50 ± 1.12 years, respectively (t = 18.25, p > 0.000). CA-DA difference between the two groups was highly significant (t = 12.43, p > 0.000). Gender differences were not detected. Furthermore, no differences were noted in dental age compared with chronological age in cases of unilateral versus bilateral third molar agenesis or in one jaw versus two jaws (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Dental development was delayed in subjects with third molar agenesis but the delay in dental age was not affected by the severity or site of agenesis.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

1. Uslenghi S, Liversidge HM, Wong FS. A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:129-33.

2. Harris EF, Evans JB, Smith AS. Bilateral asymmetry of tooth formation is elevated in children with simple hypodontia. Arch Oral Biol 2011;56:687-94.

3. Tunç EŞ, Bayrak Ş, Koyutürk AE. Dental development in children with mild-to-moderate hypodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011;139:334-8.

4. Ruiz-Mealin EV, Parekh S, Jones SP, Moles DR, Gill DS. Radiographic study of delayed tooth development in patients with dental agenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:307-14.

5. Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Nur M. Patterns of third-molar agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:856-60.

6. Baba-Kawano S, Toyoshima Y, Regalado L, Sa’do B, Nakasima A. Relationship between congenitally missing lower third molars and late formation of tooth germs. Angle Orthod 2002;72:112-7.

7. Ben-Bassat Y, Babadzhanov D, Brin I, Hazan-Molina H, Aizenbud D. Maturation of teeth adjacent to dental agenesis site. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:516-22.

8. Dhamo B, Vucic S, Kuijpers MA, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Wolvius EB et al. The association between hypodontia and dental development. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1347-54.

9. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res 1963;42:SUPPL1344-63.

10. Nolla C. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 1960;27:254-66.

11. Moorrees C, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1963;42:1490-502.

12. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27.

13. Coutinho S, Buschang PH, Miranda F. Relationship between mandibular canine calcification stages and skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:262-8.

14. Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian’s technique revisited. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:893-5.

15. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices of teeth. Int J Legal Med 2006;120:49- 52.

16. Sierra AM. Assessment of dental and skeletal maturity. Angle Orthod 1987;57:194-208.

17. Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol 1976;3:411-21.

18. Leroy R, Bogaerts K, Lesaffre E, Declerck D. The emergence of permanent teeth in Flemish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:30-9.

19. Diamanti J, Townsend GC. New standards for permanent tooth emergence in Australian children. Aust Dent J 2003;48:39-42.

20. Barnett DP. Late development of a lower third molar—a case report. Br J Orthod 1976;3:111-2.

21. Richardson M. Late third molar genesis: its significance in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1980;50:121-8. [Abstract]

22. Kullman L. Accuracy of two dental and one skeletal age estimation method in Swedish adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 1995;75:225-36.

23. Kurita LM, Menezes AV, Casanova MS, Haiter-Neto F. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: radiographic assessment of dental age in Brazilian population. J App Oral Sci 2007;15:99-104.

24. Abou El-Yazeed M, Abou Zeid W, Tawfik W. Dental maturation assessment by Nolla’s technique on a group of Egyptian children. Aust J Basic and App Sci 2008;2:1418-24.

25. Maia MC, Martins Mda G, Germano FA, Brandão Neto J, da Silva CA. Demirjian’s system for estimating the dental age of Northeastern Brazilian children. Forensic Sci Int 2010;200(1-3):177.e1-4.

26. Patnana AK, Vabbalareddy RS, V Vanga NR. Evaluating the reliability of three different dental age estimation methods in visakhapatnam children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7:186-91.

27. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y et al. The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 2009;193(1-3):1-13.

28. Kan WY, Seow WK, Holcombe T. A case-control study of dental development in Hypodontic and Hyperdontic children. Pediatr Dent 2010;32:127-33.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS