Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns


Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine


ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480





Volume / Issue / page

Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 32 , ISSUE 1 (May 2016) > List of articles

Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns

Alwyn Wong / Michael G. Woods * / Damien Stella

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 2-17, DOI:

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Published Online: 30-July-2021



Aim: The present study was undertaken to assess the relationship between the mandibular muscles and dentofacial skeletal morphology in children with different underlying vertical facial patterns, using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

Method: Thirty children (mean age 12.24 ± 1.57 years) underwent cranial CT examination for diagnostic purposes. 3D-CT images were reconstructed for the evaluation of the cross-sectional size, volume, and spatial orientation of the masseter and medial pterygoid muscles. These muscle parameters were also assessed in relation to the vertical facial pattern, gender and skeleto-dental form.

Results: Significant differences were found in muscular angulation for subjects with different underlying patterns. Greater masseter volumes were associated with increased facial width. Greater intermolar widths were found in brachyfacial subjects, with less acute muscular angulations in relation to horizontal reference lines, compared with dolichofacial subjects. This was also more obvious in the maxillary arch.

Conclusion: Clinicians should note the likely differences in masseter and medial pterygoid orientation and volume in subjects with different underlying vertical facial patterns and that these differences may, in turn, be related to both facial skeletal width and naturally-occurring transverse dental arch dimensions.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Kitai N, Fujii Y, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular form in adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res 2002;81:752-6.

2. van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 1992;71:1279-85.

3. Pepicelli AJ, Woods MG, Briggs C. The mandibular muscles and their importance in contemporary orthodontics: a contemporary review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:774-80.

4. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:10 e1-13.

5. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations. Aust Orthod J 2007;23:55-64.

6. Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989;80:429-45.

7. Weijs WA, Hillen B. Relationships between masticatory muscle cross-section and skull shape. J Dent Res 1984;63:1154-7.

8. Weijs WA, Hillen B. Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;70:423-31.

9. Boom HP, van Spronsen PH, van Ginkel FC, van Schijndel RA, Castelijns JA, Tuinzing DB. A comparison of human jaw muscle cross-sectional area and volume in long- and short-face subjects, using MRI. Arch Oral Biol 2008;53:273-81.

10. Charalampidou M, Kjellberg H, Georgiakaki I, Kiliaridis S. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:23-30.

11. Kiliaridis S, Georgiakaki I, Katsaros C. Masseter muscle thickness and maxillary dental arch width. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:259-63.

12. Satiroğlu F1, Arun T, Işik F. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:562-7.

13. Ingervall B, Bitsanis E. A pilot study of the effect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children. Eur J Orthod 1987;9:15-23.

14. Kiliaridis S, Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Craniofacial morphology, occlusal traits, and bite force in persons with advanced occlusal tooth wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:286-92.

15. Kiliaridis S, Tzakis MG, Carlsson GE. Effects of fatigue and chewing training on maximal bite force and endurance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:372-8.

16. Kiliaridis S, Mejersjö C, Thilander B. Muscle function and craniofacial morphology: a clinical study in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:131-8.

17. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:297-303.

18. Newton JP, Abel EW, Robertson EM, Yemm R. Changes in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles with age: a study by computed tomography. Gerodontics 1987;3:151-4.

19. Haskell B, Day M, Tetz J. Computer-aided modeling in the assessment of the biomechanical determinants of diverse skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod 1986;89:363-82.

20. Kasai K, Richards LC, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T. Cephalometric analysis of masseter muscle and dentoskeletal morphology in dentate and edentulous humans. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1997;39:78-85.

21. Gedrange T, Büttner C, Schneider M, Oppitz R, Harzer W. Myosin heavy chain protein and gene expression in the masseter muscle of adult patients with distal or mesial malocclusion. J Appl Genet 2005;46:227-36.

22. Lim D, Beitzel F, Lynch GS, Woods MG. Myosin heavy chain isoform composition of human masseter muscle from subjects with different mandibular plane angles. Aust Orthod J 2006;22:105-14.

23. Pereira LJ, Gavião MB, Bonjardim LR, Castelo PM, van der Bilt A. Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:72-8.

24. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1983;62:566-70.

25. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face children. J Dent Res 1983;62:571-4.

26. Usui T, Uematsu S, Kanegae H, Morimoto T, Kurihara S. Change in maximum occlusal force in association with maxillofacial growth. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:226-34.

27. Farella M, Bakke M, Michelotti A, Rapuano A, Martina R. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:183-8.

28. Garcia-Morales P, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, English JD. Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:265-72.

29. Cha BK, Kim CH, Baek SH. Skeletal sagittal and vertical facial types and electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscle. Angle Orthod 2007;77:463-70.

30. Fitzpatrick B, Woods MG, Lynch GS, Manton DJ. Denervation and β2 adrenoceptor agonist administration on craniofacial bone density. Aust Orthod J 2014;30:32-8.

31. Fitzpatrick B, Woods MG, Lynch GS, Manton DJ. The effects of denervation and Formoterol administration on facial growth. Aust Orthod J 2014;30:161-8.

32. Mayne RJ, van der Poel C, Woods MG, Lynch GS. Skeletal effects of the alteration of masseter muscle function. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:184-94.

33. Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Zonneveld FW, PrahlAndersen B. Precision and accuracy of CT-based measurements of masticatory muscles in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:12-6.

34. Proctor AD, de Vincenzo JP. Masseter muscle position relative to dentofacial form. Angle Orthod 1970;40:37-44.

35. van Spronsen PH, Koolstra JH, van Ginkel FC, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B. Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:313-28.

36. Hounsfield GN. Nobel Award address. Computed medical imaging. Med Phys 1980;7:283-90.

37. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:164-71.

38. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D CT evaluation of masseter muscle morphology after setback osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:461-70.

39. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:224-30.

40. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.

41. Schlueter B, Kim KB, Oliver D, Sortiropoulos G. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle. Angle Orthod 2008;78:880-8.

42. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:170-6.

43. Ariji Y, Kawamata A, Yoshida K, Sakuma S, Nawa H, Fujishita M and Ariji E. Three-dimensional morphology of the masseter muscle in patients with mandibular prognathism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:113-8.

44. van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:351-61.

45. Gionhaku N, Lowe AA. Relationship between jaw muscle volume and craniofacial form. J Dent Res 1989;68:805-9.

46. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:659-70.

47. Xu JA, Yuasa K, Yoshiura K, Kanda S. Quantitative analysis of masticatory muscles using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:154-8.

48. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res 1999;78:31-42.

49. Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, Van Ginkel FC, PrahlAndersen B. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:323-32.

50. Sasaki K, Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size, position, and angulation of human jaw muscles and unilateral first molar bite force. J Dent Res 1989;68:499-503.

51. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1983;338:37-49.

52. Miyamoto K, Yamada K, Ishizuka Y, Morimoto N, Tanne K. Masseter muscle activity during the whole day in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:394-8.

53. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 1969;55:109-23.

54. Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965;35:36-50.

55. Sassouni V, Nanda SK. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 1964;50:801-23.

56. Ranly DM. A synopsis of craniofacial growth. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts; 1980.

57. van Limborgh J. A new view of the control of the morphogensis of the skull. Acta Morhphol Neerl Scand 1970;8:143-60.

58. Carter GM, Harkness EM. Alterations to mandibular form following motor denervation of the masseter muscle. J Anat 1995;186:541-8.

59. Nanda SK, Merow WW, Sassouni V. Repositioning of the masseter muscle and its effect on skeletal form and structure. Angle Orthod 1967;37:304-8.

60. Chen F, Terada K, Wu L, Saito I. Dental arch widths and mandibularmaxillary base width in Class III malocclusions with low, average an high MP-SN angles. Angle Orthod 2007;77:36-41.

61. Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:288-94.

62. Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971;41:219-29.

63. Nasby JA, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW, Speidel TM. Orthodontic extractions and the facial skeletal pattern. Angle Orthod 1972;42:116-22.

64. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003;112:951-7.

65. Mupparapu M. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:168-72; discussion 172.

66. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-13.

67. Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2003;19:67-75.

68. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:371-7.

69. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-26.

70. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:930-8.

71. Wörtche R1, Hassfeld S, Lux CJ, Müssig E, Hensley FW, Krempien R et al. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:88-94.