Short-term treatment effects of the quad-helix appliance on dentofacial morphology of hyperdivergent patients

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480

DESCRIPTION

0
Reader(s)
0
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 32 , ISSUE 2 (November 2016) > List of articles

Short-term treatment effects of the quad-helix appliance on dentofacial morphology of hyperdivergent patients

Saori Endo / Wataru Yamada / Isao Shundo / Yoshiki Kobayashi / Akira Komatsuzaki / Toshiya Endo *

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 211-220, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-130

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Published Online: 30-July-2021

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of short-term expansion treatment using the quad-helix appliance on dentofacial morphology in orthodontic patients presenting with a hyperdivergent facial pattern.

Methods: The treatment group consisted of 40 patients with a hyperdivergent facial pattern, who were treated for maxillary incisor crowding with a quad-helix appliance during the mixed dentition period. Lateral cephalograms taken at the start (T0) and end (T1) of the treatment were obtained as a course of care. A similar number of patients, who possessed the same type of facial pattern and who remained untreated, were assigned to a control group. Two consecutive lateral cephalograms of each untreated patient were taken at the same time points as T0 and T1. All cephalograms were traced, analysed and compared between the two groups.

Results: The treatment changes as a result of the quad-helix appliance were expressed in an upward rotation of the mandible (2.34°) and distal tipping and impeded mesial movement of the maxillary first molars. Significant differences were evident between the treatment and control groups.

Conclusion: Quad-helix appliance treatment can be appropriate for significantly decreasing the mandibular plane angle in hyperdivergent patients presenting with moderate maxillary incisor crowding and a positive overjet and overbite.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

1. Boysen B, La Cour K, Athanasiou AE, Gjessing PE. Threedimensional evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after posterior crossbite correction by quad-helix or removable appliances. Br J Orthod 1992;19:97-107.

2. Erdinç AE, Ugur T, Erbay E. A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:287-300.

3. Sandikçioğlu M, Hazar S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:321-7.

4. Shundo S, Kobayashi Y, Endo T. Short-term treatment effects of quad-helix on maxillomandibular expansion in patients with maxillary incisor crowding. Odontology 2012;100:76-86.

5. Kobayashi Y, Shundo I, Endo T. Treatment effects of quad-helix on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars. Angle Orthod 2012;82:676-81.

6. Hermanson H, Kurol J, Rönnerman A. Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite with quad-helix and removable plates. A retrospective study. Eur Journal Orthod 1985;7:97-102.

7. Kecik D, Kocadereli I, Saatci I. Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:202-15.

8. Frank SW, Engel GA. The effects of maxillary quad-helix appliance expansion on cephalometric measurements in growing orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1982;81:378-89.

9. Cozza P, Giancotti A, Petrosino A. Rapid palatal expansion in mixed dentition using a modified expander: a cephalometric investigation. J Orthod 2001;28:129-34.

10. Chung CH, Font B. Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:569-75.

11. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:734-9.

12. Cozza P, Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment effects of quad-Helix/crib therapy of dentoskeletal open bite. Angle Orthod 2007;77:640-5.

13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M. Comparison of 2 early treatment protocols for open-bite malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:743-7.

14. Giuntini V, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Cozza P. Dentoskeletal changes associated with fixed and removable appliances with a crib in open-bite patients in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:77-80.

15. Mucedero M, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, McNamara JA Jr, Cozza P. Stability of quad-helix/crib therapy in dentoskeletal open bite: a long-term controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:695-703.

16. Lineberger MW, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Herberger T, Franchi L. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:60-9.

17. Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry. A Study on the cephalometric standards of Japanese children. Jpn J Pediatr Dent 1995;33:659-96.

18. Broadbent BH, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH. The Bolton standards. In: Broadbent BH, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH, eds. Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1975;62-81.

19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-91.

20. Kiekens RM, Maltha JC, van’t Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:579-84.

21. Kitafusa Y. Application of “prescale” as an aid to clinical diagnosis in orthodontics. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2004;45:99-108.

22. Custodio W, Gomes SG, Faot F, Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:343-9.

23. Allareddy V, Rampa S, Masoud MI, Lee MK, Nalliah R, Allareddy V. Overview of registered studies in orthodontics: Evaluation of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:587-93.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS