SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 78-86, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-143
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Published Online: 15-August-2021
This study applies recent advances in 3D virtual imaging for application in the prediction planning of dentofacial deformities. Stereo-photogrammetry has been used to create virtual and physical models, which are creatively combined in planning the surgical correction of anterior open bite. The application of these novel methods is demonstrated through the surgical correction of a case.
1. Kim YH. Anterior openbite and its treatment with multiloop edgewise archwire. Angle Orthod 1987;57:290-321.
2. Enacar A, Ugur T, Toroglu S. A method for correction of open bite. J clin orthod 1996:30:43-8.
3. Kiliaridis S, Egermark I, Thilander B. Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:447-57.
4. Park YC, Lee HA, Choi NC, Kim DH. Open bite correction by intrusion of posterior teeth with miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2008;78:699-710.
5. Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H et al. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002;17:243-53.
6. Bailey LJ, Collie FM, White RP Jr. Long-term soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996;11:7-18.
7. Konstiantos KA, O’Reilly MT, Close J. The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner (computer software). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:241-9.
8. Eckhardt CE, Cunningham SJ. How predictable is orthognathic surgery? Eur J Orthod 2004;26:303-9.
9. Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:527-36.
10. Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:79-83.
11. Kolokitha OE, Topouzelis N. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011;10:236-45.
12. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2080-92.
13. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F et al. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:297-307.
14. Walker F, Ayoub AF, Moos KF, Barbenel J. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:567-72.
15. O’Malley AM, Milosevic A. Comparison of three facebow/semiadjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:185-90.
16. O’Neil M, Khambay B, Bowman A, Moos KF, Barbenel J, Walker F et al. Validation of a new method for building a three-dimensional physical model of the skull and dentition. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:49-54.
17. Lundström A, Lundström F, Lebret LM, Moorrees CF. Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:111-20.
18. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25.
19. Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:341-52.