What is the evidence for harm minimisation measures in gambling venues?

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Evidence Base

Australia and New Zealand School of Government

Subject: Management

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 1838-9422

DESCRIPTION

7
Reader(s)
22
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 2014 , ISSUE 2 (June 2014) > List of articles

  • |

What is the evidence for harm minimisation measures in gambling venues?

Charles Livingstone * / Angela Rintoul / Louise Francis

Citation Information : Evidence Base. VOLUME 2014 , ISSUE 2 , ISSN (Online) 1838-9422, DOI: 10.21307/eb-2014-002, June 2014 © 2014.© The Australia and New Zealand School of Government

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 27-February-2017

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

The use of electronic gambling machines (EGMs) in Australia and New Zealand constitutes the largest sector of the gambling industry. The costs arising from the harms of gambling detract significantly from its benefits, and in all Australian jurisdictions various policy measures have been implemented to reduce these harms. If successful, these would maximise the net benefits associated with EGM gambling. This article reviews the available evidence for a range of these practices, particularly those implemented within EGM venues via ‘codes of practice’. These codes of practice are intended to give effect to the principles of ‘responsible gambling’ within EGM venues. These measures are: self-exclusion, signage, messages, interaction with gamblers, the removal of ATMs from gambling venues, and ‘responsible gambling’ assessed overall in a venue context. In addition, we review the evidence in support of two major recommendations of the Productivity Commission’s 2010 report into gambling, pre-commitment and one-dollar maximum wagers. We conclude that there is a modest level of evidence supporting some measures, notably self-exclusion and, to a greater extent, the removal of ATMs. There is also some evidence that ‘responsible gambling’ measures have, collectively, reduced the harms associated with gambling. However, there is limited evidence to confirm the effectiveness of most individual ‘responsible gambling’ measures actually implemented in venues. Further, policy measures implemented outside the control of venues (such as ATM removal, reduction in bet limits, and the prohibition of smoking) appear to be associated with more significant effects, based on analysis of EGM revenue data in Victoria. The evidence for prospective measures is necessarily limited since the ultimate test is post-implementation efficacy, but there is growing evidence to suggest that pre-commitment, one-dollar maximum bets or other machine design changes may yield significantly more effective harm minimisation effects than in-venue practices such as signage or, indeed, self-exclusion. In considering evidence about the effects of existing or prospective measures it is important to emphasise that packages of measures might be more effective than single ones, and that an inability to confirm a statistically significant effect does not mean that no effect exists.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2014. Cat no. 6401.0 Consumer Price Index Australia, Tables 1 and 2, ABS, Canberra.  
  2. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V 2013. Problem gambling prevention: before, during, and after measures. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(5): 568–582.  
  3. Banks, G 2011. Evidence and Social Policy: The Case of Gambling. Paper presented at the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, Corporate Seminar, Adelaide.  
  4. Bernhard, BJ, Lucas, AF, and Jang, D 2006. Responsible Gaming Device Research Report, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.  
  5. Blaszczynski, A 2001. Harm Minimization Strategies in Gambling: An Overview of International Initiatives and Interventions. Australia Gaming Council, Canberra.  
  6. Blaszczynski, A, Ladouceur, R, Goulet, A, and Savard, C 2008. Differences in monthly versus daily evaluations of money spent on gambling and calculation strategies. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21: 98–105.  
  7. Blaszczynski, A, Ladouceur, R, and Nower, L 2007. Self-exclusion: A proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7(1): 59–71.  
  8. Blaszczynski, A, Sharpe, L, and Walker, M 2001. The assessment of the impact of the reconfiguration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling Final Report. University of Sydney Gambling Research Unit.  
  9. CBC News 2014. VLT cards that track gambling habits abandoned in Nova Scotia, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  10. Cassidy, R., Loussouarn, C, and Pisac, A 2013. Fair Game: Producing Gambling Research, Goldsmiths University, London.  
  11. Centre for the Advancement of Best Practices 2009. Insight 2009: Play Information and Managment System, Responsible Gambling Council, Ontario.  
  12. Clubs Australia Incorporated 2012. Part of the Solution: Clubs Promoting a Culture of Responsible Gambling. Clubs Australia Incorporated, Sydney.  
  13. Cohen, IM, McCormick, AV, and Corrado, RR 2011. BCLC Voluntary Self-Exclusion Program.  
  14. Croucher, R, and Croucher, J 2005. Self-exclusion programs for problem gamblers in Australia. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics, 5, 61–66.  
  15. Delfabbro, P 2012. Evaluation of the Maxetag Budget Setting Feature: Final report. Adelaide, School of Psychology, University of Adelaide.  
  16. Delfabbro, P, Borgas, M, and King, D 2012. Venue Staff Knowledge of Their Patrons' Gambling and Problem Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(2): 155–169.  
  17. Department of Justice 2009. A Study of Gambling in Victoria: Problem Gambling from a Public Health Perspective. Victorian Government, Department of Justice, Melbourne.  
  18. Department of Justice and Attorney-General 2013. Queensland Responsible Gambling Resource Manual, Section D, Version 3, .  
  19. Dixon, MJ, Harrigan, KA, Sandhu, R, Collins, K, and Fugelsang, JA 2010. Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105(10), 1819–1824. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03050.x  
  20. Centre for Gambling Research and Australian National University 2004. 2003 Victorian Longitudinal Community Attitudes Survey. Gambling Research Panel, Melbourne.  
  21. Gainsbury, S 2010. Self-exclusion: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph.  
  22. Gainsbury, S 2014. Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2): 229–251.  
  23. Gainsbury, S, Russell, A and Blaszczynski, A 2014. Are Psychology University Student Gamblers Representative of Non-university Students and General Gamblers? A Comparative Analysis, Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(10): 11–25.  
  24. Government Statistician, and Queensland Treasury and Trade 2014. Australian Gambling STatistics 1986-87 to 2011-12, 29th edition, Queensland Treasury and Trade, Brisbane.  
  25. Hayer, T, and Meyer, G 2011. Self-exclusion as a harm minimization strategy: evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries, Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4): 685–700.  
  26. Hing, N 2004. The efficacy of responsible gambling measures in NSW clubs: The gamblers’ perspective. Gambling Australia, 16(1): 32–46.  
  27. Hoffmann, BH 2012. Responsible gaming and IVTs (Interactive Video Terminals): The Norwegian story – With a happy ending? Norsk Tipping AS – Norwegian National Lottery, April, , viewed 16 September 2014.  
  28. House of Assembly Select Committee 2010. The Gaming Control Amendment Bill 2010 ($1 bet limit). Hobart, Tasmania 
  29. Ladouceur, R, Blaszczynski, A, and Lalande, DR 2012. Pre-commitment in gambling: A review of the empirical evidence, International Gambling Studies, 12(2): 215–230.  
  30. Ladouceur, R, Bouchard, C, Rheaume, N, Jacques, C, Ferland, F, Leblond, J, and Walker, M 2000a. Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults? Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(1): 1–24.  
  31. Ladouceur, R, Jacques, C, Giroux, I, Ferland, F, and Leblond, J 2000b. Brief communications analysis of a casino's self-exclusion program, Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4): 453–460.  
  32. Ladouceur, R, Sylvain, C, and Gosselin, P 2007. Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study, Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1): 85–94.  
  33. Livingstone, C, and Woolley, R 2007. Risky business: A few provocations on the regulation of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 7(3): 361–376.  
  34. Livingstone, C, Woolley, R, Zazryn, T, Bakacs, L, and Sharmi, R 2008. The Relevance and Role of Gaming Machine Games and Game Features on the Play of Problem Gamblers, Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia, Adelaide.  
  35. Markham, F, Young, M, and Doran, B 2014. Gambling expenditure predicts harm: evidence from a venue-level study. Addiction, 109(9): 1509–16.  
  36. McAllister, I 2014. Public opinion towards gambling and gambling regulation in Australia, International Gambling Studies, 14(1): 146–160.  
  37. McDonnell-Phillips 2006. Analysis of Gambler Pre-commitment Behaviour, Gambling Research Australia.  
  38. McMillen, J, and Pitt, S 2005. Review of the ACT Government’s Harm Minimisation Measures. Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University, Canberra.  
  39. McMillen, J, and Wright, J 2008. Re-regulating the gambling industry: Regulatory reform in Victoria and New South Wales, 1999–2006, Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(2): 277–300.  
  40. McMillen, J, Marshall, D, and Murphy, L 2004. The use of ATMs in ACT Gaming Venues: An Empirical Study, Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University, Canberra.  
  41. Nelson, SE, Kleschinsky, JH, LaBrie, RA, Kaplan, S, and Shaffer, H. 2010. One decade of self-exclusion: Missouri Casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment, Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1): 129–144.  
  42. Department of Internal Affairs 2006. Operational Policy – Internal Guidelines Harm Prevention, Harm Minimisation and Responsible Gambling.  
  43. Department of Internal Affairs 2014. Gambling Expenditure Statistics, , viewed 28 July 2014.  
  44. Fisher, D 2014. Facial recognition technology to nab casino’s banned gamblers, New Zealand Herald, , viewed 16 September 2014.  
  45. Nisbet, S 2005. Responsible gambling features of card-based technologies, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3(2): 54–63.  
  46. Nisbet, S 2006. Modelling consumer intention to use gambling technologies: An innovative approach, Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(3): 221–231.  
  47. Nower, L, and Blaszczynski, A 2010. Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3): 361–372. 
  48. O’Neil, M, Whetton, S, Dolman, B, Herbert, M, Giannopoulos, V, O'Neil, D, and Wordley, J 2003. Evaluation of Self-exclusion Programs and Harm Minimisation Measures: Report A. South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, Adelaide.  
  49. Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing 2012. Queensland Responsible Gambling Code of Practice, , viewed 16 September 2014.  
  50. Office of Regulatory Policy 2009. Report: Queensland Card-based Gaming Trials, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane.  
  51. Omnifacts Bristol Research 2007. Nova Scotia Player Card Research Project: Stage III Research Report, Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation.  
  52. Panichi, J 2013. The Lobby Group that got much more Bang for its Buck, , viewed 5 April 2014.  
  53. Parke, J, Rigbye, J, and Parke, A 2008. Cashless and Card-based Technologies in Gambling: A Review of the Literature, UK Gambling Commission, Birmingham.  
  54. Polatschek, A, Wadden, L, and Gwynn, M 2013. My-Play: Nova Scotia’s Experience with a Responsible Gambling System for VLTs, paper presented at the National Association of Gambling Studies, Sydney.  
  55. Productivity Commission 2010. Gambling. Report no. 50, Australian Government, Canberra.  
  56. Rose, G, Khaw, K. T, and Marmot, M 2008. Rose’s Strategy of Preventive Medicine, Oxford University Press, USA.  
  57. Sani, A, Carlevaro, T, and Ladouceur, R 2005. Impact of a counselling session on at-risk casino patrons: A pilot study. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 17(1): 47.  
  58. Schellinck, T, and Schrans, T 2007. Final Report: Assessment of the Behavioural Impact of Responsible Gambling Device (RGD) Features: Analysis of Nova Scotia Player-card Data – The Windsor Trial, Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation Responsible Gaming Research Device Project, Focal Research, Halifax.  
  59. Schellinck, T, and Schrans, T 2010. Evaluating the Impact of the ‘My-Play’ System in Nova Scotia Phase 1: Regular VL Player Benchmark Survey, Technical report, Focal Research, Halifax.  
  60. Schottler Consulting 2008. Major Findings of a Trial of a Card-based Gaming Product at the Sandgate RSL: Card-based Trial Evaluation.  
  61. Schottler Consulting 2009. Major Findings of a Trial of a Card-based Gaming Product at the Redcliffe RSL.  
  62. Schottler Consulting. 2010. Major Findings and Implications: Player Tracking and Precommitment Trial – A Program and Outcome Evaluation of the PlaySmart Precommitment System. South Australian Treasury, Adelaide.  
  63. Schottler Consulting 2010a. Factors that Influence Gambler Adherence to Pre-commitment decision. Gambling Research Australia, Melbourne.  
  64. Schottler Consulting 2010b. Major findings and implications: Player tracking and Precommitment trial. A Program and Outcome Evaluation of the PlaySmart Precommitment System. South Australian Treasury, Adelaide.  
  65. Schüll, ND 2012. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas, Princeton University Press, Princeton.  
  66. Steinberg, M, and Velardo, W 2002. Preliminary Evaluation of a Casino Self-Exclusion Program, paper presented at the Responsible Gambling Councils Discover Conference, Niagara Falls, Canada. 
  67. Svenska Spel 2013. Svenska Spel Pre-commitment: Information Videos for Customers and Retailers, Sweden.  
  68. Svenska Spel 2013. “From voluntary to necessary”: Responsible Gaming System on VLTs, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  69. Thomas, A, Delfabbro, P, and Armstrong, A 2014. Validation Study of In-venue Problem Gambling Indicators, Gambling Research Australia, , viewed 16 September 2014.  
  70. Thomas, A, Pfeifer, J, Moore, S, Meyer, D, Yap, L, and Armstrong, A 2013. Evaluation of the Removal of ATMs from Gaming Venues in Victoria, Australia, Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing, Department of Justice, Melbourne.  
  71. Townshend, P 2007. Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 390–395.  
  72. United Kingdom Gambling Commission 2011. Industry Statistics: April 2008 to March 2011, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  73. Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation 2014. List of Responsible Gambling Codes of Conduct, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  74. Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation 2014. Gambling Expenditure Data, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  75. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation 2014. What is Responsible Gambling?, , viewed 28 July 2014.  
  76. Wilkie, A 2011. Personal correspondence.  
  77. Williams, R 2010. Pre-commitment as a Strategy for Minimizing Gambling-related Harm, Alberta Gaming Research Institute, Edmonton.  
  78. Williams, R, West, B, and Simpson, R 2007. Prevention of Problem Gambling: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph.  
  79. Williams, R, West, B, and Simpson, R 2012. Prevention of Problem Gambling: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence and Identified Best Practices, Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.  
  80. Williams, R 2013. Prevention of Problem Gambling: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence and Identified Best Practices, webinar presentation, , viewed 4 September 2014.  
  81. Zheng, WY, Walker, M, and Blaszczynski, A 2010. Mahjong gambling in the Chinese-Australian community in Sydney: A prevalence study, Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3): 441–454. 

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS

  • |