Cost-effectiveness of FDA variance for blood collection from individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis at a 398-bed hospitalbased donor center


Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:


American National Red Cross

Subject: Medical Laboratory Technology


ISSN: 0894-203X
eISSN: 1930-3955





Volume / Issue / page

Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Volume 30 (2014)
Volume 29 (2013)
Volume 28 (2012)
Volume 27 (2011)
Volume 26 (2010)
Volume 25 (2009)
Volume 24 (2008)
Volume 23 (2007)
Volume 22 (2006)
Volume 21 (2005)
Volume 20 (2004)
Volume 19 (2003)
Volume 18 (2002)
Volume 17 (2001)
Volume 16 (2000)
Volume 15 (1999)
Volume 14 (1998)
Volume 13 (1997)
Volume 12 (1996)
Volume 11 (1995)
Volume 10 (1994)
Volume 9 (1993)
Volume 8 (1992)
Volume 7 (1991)
Volume 6 (1990)
Volume 5 (1989)
Volume 4 (1988)
Volume 3 (1987)
Related articles

VOLUME 25 , ISSUE 4 (December 2009) > List of articles

Cost-effectiveness of FDA variance for blood collection from individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis at a 398-bed hospitalbased donor center

Dee M. Gribble / DJ Chaffin / Barbara J. Bryant

Keywords : hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), FDA variance, HH donor program

Citation Information : Immunohematology. Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 170-173, DOI:

License : (Transfer of Copyright)

Published Online: 20-March-2020



Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is treated by therapeutic phlebotomy to reduce excess body iron. This 398-bed, hospital-based donor center wanted to determine whether there was a financial advantage to requesting FDA approval to allow transfusion of blood components from eligible individuals with HH. Donor center records from 2008 were reviewed to identify all therapeutic phlebotomy patients with a diagnosis of HH. HH patients were contacted and asked to complete the AABB Uniform Donor History Questionnaire (UDHQ) to determine their eligibility as potential allogeneic blood donors. Financial ramifications attributable to loss of revenue from the therapeutic phlebotomies ($100/collection) were compared with the potential gain in revenue from collecting units for transfusion ($429/collection) in a 12-month period. Nineteen HH patients were identified and screened for allogeneic eligibility. Seventeen patients (89%) met the eligibility criteria for allogeneic donors, and two patients (11%) did not. Retrospective review of donor records indicated that a total of 60 units were collected from these HH patients from January 2008 through December 2008. Fifty-five of the 60 units collected (92%) were eligible for allogeneic use, potentially generating gross revenue of $23,595. After deducting expenses for infectious disease testing and loss of revenue for the nonqualified therapeutic phlebotomies, the net revenue from the collection of 55 RBC units that could have potentially been used for allogeneic transfusion was $20,345. In contrast, the current revenue generated by the collection of 60 therapeutic phlebotomies was only $6,000. In 2008, using eligible HH individuals as allogeneic blood donors would have resulted in an increase in revenue of $14,345 for our blood center. This study demonstrates that even at a medium-size, hospital-based donor center, obtaining a variance from the FDA to establish an HH blood donor program is a cost-effective endeavor, which does not compromise donor or patient safety.

You don't have 'Full Text' access of this article.

Purchase Article Subscribe Journal Share