SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems. Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 2,155-2,181, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2017-632
License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Received Date : 30-June-2013 / Accepted: 23-November-2013 / Published Online: 16-December-2013
Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is widely used in many practical engineering fields due to good stability margin and strong robustness. But there is little literature reports the technology that has been used to control the flying wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). In this paper, aiming at the longitudinal static and dynamic characteristics of the flying wing UAV, LQR technology will be introduced to the flying wing UAV flight control. The longitudinal stability augmentation control law and longitudinal attitude control law are designed. The stability augmentation control law is designed by using output feedback linear quadratic method. It can not only increase the longitudinal static stability, but also improve the dynamic characteristics. The longitudinal attitude control law of the flying wing UAV is designed by using command tracking augmented LQR method. The controller can realize the control and maintain the flight attitude and velocity under the condition without breaking robustness of LQR. It solves the command tracking problems that conventional LQR beyond reach. Considering that some state variables of the system are difficult to obtain directly, a control method that called quasi-command tracking augmented LQR is designed by combing with the reduced order observer, it retains all the features of command tracking augmented LQR and more suitable for the application of practice engineering. Finally, the control laws are simulated under the environment of Matlab/Simulink. The results show that the longitudinal control laws of the flying wing UAV which are designed based on LQR can make the flying wing UAV achieve satisfactory longitudinal flying quality.
 R.M. Wood and X.S. Bauer, “Flying wings/flying fuselages”, AIAA paper 2001-0311,
January 2001, pp. 1-7.
 W.R. Sear, “Flying Wing airplanes-The XB-35/YB-49 program”, AIAA paper 80-3036 in
Evolution of Aircraft Wing Design Sytnposium, pp. 57-59, March 1980.
 S. Esteban, “Static and dynamic analysis of analysis of an unconventional plane flying wing”,
AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada. August 2001,
 A.R. Weyl, “Tailless Aircraft and Flying Wings A Study of Their Evolution and Their
Problems”, Aircraft Engineering, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 8-13, January 1945.
 G. Yang, J.G. Sun and Q.H. Li, “Augmented LQR Method for Aeroengine Control Systems”,
Journal of Aerospace Power, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 153-158, February 2004.
 W.K. Lai, M. F. Rahmat and N.A. Wahab, “Modeling and controller design of pneumatic
actuator system with control valve”, International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent
Systems, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 624-644, September 2012.
 R. Ghazali, M. Rahmat, Z. Zulfatman et al., “Perfect tracking control with discrete-time lqr
for a non-minimum phase electro-hydraulic actuator system”. International Journal on Smart
Sensing and Intelligent Systems, vol. 4, No. 3, pp.424-439, September 2011.
 L. Gargouri, A. Zaafouri and A. Kochbati et al., “LQG／LTR Control of a Direct Current
Motor”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2002 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, vol. 5, pp.
5-10, May 2002.
 O. Rehman, B. Fidan and I.R. Petersen, “Minimax LQR control design for a hypersonic flight
vehicle”, 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and
Technologies Conference, October 2009.
 R.W. Huang and Y.D Zhao, “Soft landing control of electromagnetic Valve actuation for
engines by using LQR”, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 47, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1338-1342.
 S.B. McCamish, M. Romano and S. Nolet et al., “Flight testing of multiple-spacecraft
control on SPHERES during close-proximity operations”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol.
46, No. 6, pp. 1202-1213, November–December 2009.
 X.J. Xing, J.G. Yan and D.L. Yuan, “Augmented-stability controller design and its
simulation or a UAV based on LQR theory”, Flight Dynamics, vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 54-56,
 J.W. Choi, G. Daniel and L.R. Mariano, “Control System Modeling and Design for a Mars
Flyer, MACH-1 Competition”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit,
Honolulu, Hawaii, August 2008.
 Y. Tao, “Application of Explicit-Model Following Control technology in the Attitude
Control System for the Unmanned Shipboard Helicopter”, Journal of Naval Aeronautical
Engineering Institute, vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 543-546. September 2009.
 J. Andersson, P. Krus and K. Nilsson, “Optimization as a support for selection and design of
aircraft actuation systems”, Proceedings of Seventh AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on
Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, USA, September 1998.
 Y.B. Li, W.Z. Liu and Q. Song, “Improved LQG control for unmanned helicopter based on
active model in wind environment”, Flight Dynamics, vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 318-322, August 2012.
 L. Zhang and Z. Zhou, “Study on Longitudinal Control Laws for High Altitude Long
Endurance Tailless Flying-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles”, Science Technology and
Engineering, vol. 7, No. 16, pp. 1671-1819, August 2007.
 M.L. Zhang, “Flight Control System”, National defense of Industry Press, 2nd edn, pp. 41-
 E.Q. Yang, “Research on the key technology of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle flight
control system”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Automation Science and Electrical Engineering Dept.
Beijing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China, May 2006.
 G. Garcia, J. Daafouz and J. Bernussou, “Output Feedback Disk Pole Assignment for
Systems with Positive Real Uncertainty”, Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41, No.
9, 1996, pp. 1385-1391.
 D.E. Miller and M. Rossi, “Simultaneous Stabilization With Near Optimal LQR
Performance”, Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 46, No. 10, 2001, pp. 1543-1555.
 D.D. Moerder and A. Calise, “Convergence of a Numerical Algorithm for Calculating
Optimal Output Feedback Gains”, Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, No. 9,
1985, pp. 900-903.