METHOD OF OPTIMAL MEASUREMENT STRATEGY FOR ULTRA-HIGH-PRECISION MACHINE IN ROUNDNESS NANOMETROLOGY

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems

Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay

Exeley Inc. (New York)

Subject: Computational Science & Engineering , Engineering, Electrical & Electronic

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 1178-5608

DESCRIPTION

8
Reader(s)
17
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 (June 2015) > List of articles

METHOD OF OPTIMAL MEASUREMENT STRATEGY FOR ULTRA-HIGH-PRECISION MACHINE IN ROUNDNESS NANOMETROLOGY

Salah H. R. Ali

Keywords : Nanometrology, Talyrond instrument, roundness, reference algorithms, software fitting filters, uncertainty and evaluation method.

Citation Information : International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems. Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 896-920, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2017-788

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Received Date : 29-November-2014 / Accepted: 26-March-2015 / Published Online: 01-June-2015

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Talyrond-TR is a modern sensitive instrument in nanometrology. The performance of Talyrond-TR machine is very important to find an optimal result in roundness measurement. In this paper, the experimental evaluation method of Talyrond-TR 73 machine is designed by using reference standard hemisphere. The influence of Talyrond machine performance in roundness measurement is presented. Signal responses of ten metrological strategic parameters have been analyzed and discussed. Deviation in roundness measurement strategies corresponding to four reference algorithms (LS), MZ, MC; MI) and two software fitting filters (2CR and Gaussian) with four spectral frequency ranges (1:15, 1:50, 1:150; 1:500 upr) are obtained through repeated arrangement, comparison and achieved. Experimental results revealed that the lowest deviation in roundness has been investigated by using MZ reference algorithm. The average of total roundness indicates low deviation by about 65.6% and 57.3% at using 2CR- and Gaussian-filter respectively, which proved the machine reliability within application range. Furthermore, the evaluation method was performed experimentally to establish reference data sets for circular, cylindrical and spherical objects. The sets of established data at different strategic parameters have been postulated to satisfy the ability of the proposed method to correlate the roundness measurements within the application range. The experimental result ensures that the proposed evaluation method is reliable and effective. Moreover, expanded uncertainty in measurement has been estimated and confirmed the degree of confidence for the proposed method.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

[1]
Lei Zhang, Tong Li, Jian Ding and Xiumin Yang, Theory and Technology of the Single-Probe Two-Step Method to Separate Error, International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 278–296, 2013.
[2]
X.Q. Lei, W.M. Pan, X.P. Tu, and S. F. Wang, Minimum Zone Evaluation for Roundness Error Based on Geometric Approximating Searching Algorithm, MAPAN, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 143–149, 2014.
[3]
Hamdan Lateef Jaheel and Zou Beiji, A Novel Approach of Combining Steganography Algorithms, International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 90–106, 2015.
[4]
Salah H.R. Ali, Roles and Motivations for Roundness Instrumentation Metrology, Journal of Control Engineering and Instrumentation (JCEI), Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 11–28, 2015.
[5]
Y. Kim and P. Yarlagadda, Roundness Measurement and Error Separation Technique, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 303–306, pp. 390–393, 2013.
[6]
W. Zhao, J. Tan, Z. Xue and Sh. Fu, SEST: A New Error Separation Technique for Ultra-high Precision Roundness Measurement, Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 833-841, 2005.
[7]
M. Hou, L. Qiu, W. Zhao, F. Wang, E. Liu, and L. Ji, Single-step Spatial Rotation Error Separation Technique for the Ultraprecision Measurement of Surface Profiles, Applied Optics, Vol. 53, Issue 3, pp. 487–495, 2014.
[8]
S. L. Brunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical Distance and the Geometry of Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Letter, Vol. 72, Issue 22, pp. 3439–3443, 1994.
[9]
S.H.R. Ali, Performance Investigation of CMM Measurement Quality Using Flick Standard, Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, Vol. 2014, Article ID 960649, pp. 1–11, 2014.
[10]
J. Buajarern, T. Somthong, S.H.R. Ali and A. Tonmeuanwai, Effect of Step Number on Roundness Determination using Multi-Step Method, Int. Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 14, Issue 11, pp. 2047–2050, 2013.
[11]
Sh. Lou, W. Zeng, X. Jiang and P. J. Scott, Robust Filtration Techniques in Geometrical Metrology and Their Comparison, International Journal of Automation and Computing, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013.
[12]
ISO/TS 16610 Series, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Filtration, Last version (revision), 2014.
[13]
R. E. Reason, Report on Reference Lines for Roughness and Roundness. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 95–104, 1961.
[14]
D. J. Whitehouse and R. E. Reason, The Equation of the Mean Line of Surface Texture Found by an Electric Wave Filter, London, Rank Organization, UK, 1963.
[15]
D. J. Whitehouse, An Improved type of Wave Filter for use in Surface Finish Measurement, Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 192, pp. 306–318, 1967.
[16]
ISO 11562, Surface Texture: Profile Method Metrological Characteristics of Phase Correct Filters, 1996.
[17]
H. Von Weingraber, Uber die Eignung des Hullprofils als Bezugslinie fur die Messung der Rauheit (In English: About the Suitability of the Hullprofiles as Datum for Measuring the Roughness), CIRP Annals, Vol. 5, pp. 116–128, 1956.
[18]
J. Peters, J. B. Bryan, W. T. Eslter, C. Evans, H. Kunzmann, D. A. Lucca, S. Sartori, H. Sato, E. G. Thwaite, P. Vanherck, R. J. Hocken, J. Peklenik, T. Pfeifer, H. Trumpold and T. V. Vorburger, Contribution of CIRP to the development of metrology and surface quality evaluation during the last fifty years, CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 471–488, 2001.
[19]
V. Radhakrishnan, A. Weckenmann, A close look at the rough terrain of surface finish assessment. Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Eng. Manufacture, Vol. 212, No. 5, pp. 411–420, 1998.
[20]
J. Seewig, Linear and Robust Gaussian Regression Filters. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, Vol. 13, pp. 254–257, 2006.
[21]
S. Brinkmann, H. Bodschwinna, H. W. Lemke, Accessing Roughness in Three-dimensions using Gaussian Regression Filtering, Int. Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 41, No. 13-14, pp. 2153–2161, 2001.
[22]
W. Zeng, X. Jiang and P. J. Scott, Fast Algorithm of the Robust Gaussian Regression Filter for Areal Surface Analysis, Measurement Science & Tech., Vol. 21, No. 5, 055108, 2010.
[23]
M. Krystek, Form Filtering by Splines. Measurement, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 9–15, 1996.
[24]
M. Krystek, Transfer Function of Discrete Spline Filters. Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology III, P. Ciarlini, M. G. Cox, F. Pavese, D. Richter, Eds., Singapore, NJ: World Scientific, pp. 203–210, 1997.
[25]
W. Zeng, X. Jiang, P. J. Scott, A Generalised Linear and Nonlinear Spline Filter, Wear, Vol. 272, No. 3-4, pp. 544–547, 2011.
[26]
V. Srinivasan, Discrete Morphological Filters for Metrology. In Proceedings of the 6th ISMQC Symposium on Metrology for Quality Control in Production, TU Wien, Austria, pp. 623–628, 1998.
[27]
P. J. Scott, Scale-space Techniques, In Proceedings of the 10th Int. Colloquium on Surfaces, Chemintz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany, pp. 153–161, 2000.
[28]
D. Gheorghescu, Studies on Current Trends in the Field of Measurement and Control of Bearings, The Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics, Vol. 40, pp. 276–284, 2011.
[29]
S. Lou, X. Q. Jiang and P. J. Scott, Algorithms for Morphological Profile Filters and their Comparison. Precision Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 414–423, 2012.
[30]
ISO 12180-2:2011, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Cylindricity - Part 2: Specification operators, 2011.
[31]
S.H.R. Ali, The Influence of Fitting Algorithm and Scanning Speed on Roundness Error for 50 mm Standard Ring Measurement Using CMM, Metrology & Measurement Systems, Vol. XV, No.1, pp. 31–53, Jan 2008.
[32]
ISO/TS 12181-1: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Roundness; Part 1: Terms, Definitions and Parameters of Roundness, 2003.
[33]
ISO/TS 12181-2: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Roundness; Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Parameters of Roundness, 2003.
[34] X. Wen, Y. Xu, H. Li, F. Wang and D. Sheng, Monte Carlo Method for the Uncertainty Evaluation of Spatial Straightness Error Based on New Generation Geometrical Product Specification, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 875–881, 2012.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS