Publications
International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
Exeley Inc. (New York)
Subject: Computational Science & Engineering, Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
eISSN: 1178-5608
SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 5 (December 2014) > List of articles
Special issue ICST 2014
A New Method for Interference Reduction in the Smoothed Pseudo Wigner-Ville Distribution
Citation Information : International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems. Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1-5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2019-101
License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Published Online: 15-February-2020
- ARTICLE
- FIGURES & TABLES
- REFERENCES
- EXTRA FILES
- COMMENTS
ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
This article presents a new method facilitating interference reduction in the Wigner-Ville distribution, which is used for nonstationary signal analysis, for example in machine condition monitoring. The algorithm is based on multiple Smoothed Pseudo Wigner-Ville distributions: differently smoothed time-frequency planes are compared and, for every point, a cross-term free value is calculated on the basis of optimal smooth estimation. The proposed approach is compared with the Gabor-Wigner transform, the Zhao-Atlas-Marks distribution, and the Choi-Williams distribution. Five time-frequency Gaussian atoms and a bat echolocation chirp are used as the testing signals. The Rényi entropy, the ratio of norms, the Stanković measure, and the mean squared error are used as quantitative measures to demonstrate the promising results of the proposed method.
FIGURES & TABLES
REFERENCES
[1] Boashash B, Time frequency signal analysis and processing: A comprehensive reference. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003.
[2] Cohen L, Time-frequency distributions - A review. In: Proc IEEE, 1989;Vol. 77; p. 941-981.
[3] Hlawatsch F, Flandrin P. The interference structure of the Wigner distribution and related time-frequency signal representation. The Wigner Distribution - Theory and Applications in Signal Processing, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997, p. 59-133.
[4] Shafi I, et al. Techniques to Obtain Good Resolution and Concentrated Time-Frequency Distributions: A Review. EURASIP J Adv Sig Proc. 2009. 2009:673539.
[5] Flandrin P. Time-Frequency/Time-Scale Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.
[6] Williams W J, Jeong J. Reduced interference time-frequency distributions. In: Boashash B, editors. Time-Frequency Signal Analysis: Methods and Applications, N.Y.: Wiley, 1992, p. 74-97.
[7] Pei S-C, Ding J-J. Relations between Gabor Transforms and Fractional Fourier Transforms and their applications for Signal Processing. Timefrequency complexity and information. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2007;55; 4839-4850.
[8] Zhao Y, Atlas L E, Marks R J. The use of cone-shaped kernels for generalized time-frequency representations of non-stationary signals. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Process., 1990;38;1084-1091.
[9] Choi H-I, Williams W J. Improved time-frequency representation of multi-component signals using exponential kernels. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Process., 1989;37;862-871.
[10] Hlawatsch F et al. Smoothed pseudo-Wigner distribution, Choi-Williams distribution, and cone-kernel representation: Ambiguity-domain analysis and experimental comparison. Signal Process., 1995;43;149-168.
[11] Flandrin P, Baraniuk R G, Michel O. Time-frequency complexity and information. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP’94), Adelaide, Australia, 1994;3;329-332.
[12] Sang T H., Wiliams W J. Renyi information and signal-dependent optimal kernel design. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Process., 1995;2; pp. 997-1000.
[13] Jones D, Parks T. A resolution comparison of several time-frequency representations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1992;40; 413-420.
[14] Stanković L. A measure of some time-frequency distributions concentration. Signal Process., 2001;81;621-631.