Disrupting the “paradigm of one”: Restructuring structures to integrate learning in a modern learning environment

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice

New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society

Subject: Education

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1178-8690

DESCRIPTION

22
Reader(s)
37
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 32 , ISSUE 1 (June 2017) > List of articles

Disrupting the “paradigm of one”: Restructuring structures to integrate learning in a modern learning environment

Noeline Wright

Keywords : Structuring structures; logic of practice; new schools; curriculum integration; paradigm of one; modern learning environments; flexible learning spaces

Citation Information : Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 48-61, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2017-005

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 09-June-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Curriculum integration in secondary schools appears to be difficult to achieve in schools that are built on traditional models of single classrooms and a compartmentalised curriculum. The relatively insular nature of secondary school classrooms is, however, being upended in the design of new schools in New Zealand, which disrupt the single-cell classroom tradition. One principal of a new school labels this old model as the “paradigm of one”: a shorthand descriptor for the single-classroom, single-teacher, singleclass, single-subject, single assessment arrangements generally prevalent in such contexts. The aim of this principal and this new school is to provide responsive, connected, collaborative, and deep learning.                                                                                                          This article outlines efforts of that secondary school to restructure the “structuring structures” usually underpinning secondary schools, and organise learning. To that end, staff have interrogated, pulled apart and reconstituted the national curriculum document to provide an integrated learning structure. In rethinking conventional views of curriculum implementation in a secondary school, the school has created an innovative “logic of practice”.                                                                                                        I examine the thinking behind curriculum decision-making in this school and provide a glimpse of how this is played out in the first two years of its existence.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84(3), 261-271. Retrieved from: http://www.unco.edu/cebs/psychology/kevinpugh/motivation_project/ resources/ames92.pdf

Amos, C. (2014, 3 February). A beginner’s guide to Hobsonville Point Secondary School. [blog post]. Retrieved from: http://www.teachingandelearning.com/2014/02/a-beginners-guide-to-hobsonville-point.html

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2007). The learning compact redefined: A call to

action. A report of the commission on the whole child. Alexandria, VA: Retrieved from: http://www.ascd. org/ASCD/pdf/Whole%20Child/WCC%20Learning%20Compact.pdf

Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J., with McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching — a New Zealand perspective. Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington:

New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from: https://www.educationcounts.govt. nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (Trans. Richard Nice). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. (Trans. Richard Nice). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Core-Plus Mathematics CCSS Edition. (n.d.). retrieved from: http://www.cpmponline.org/ccss/CCSSEdfeatures. html

Deed, C., & Lesko, T. (2015). ‘Unwalling the classroom’: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environment Research. 18(2), 217-231.

Denscombe, M. (2012). Pupil strategies and the open classroom. In P. Woods (Ed.), Pupil Strategies (RLE Edu L): Explorations in the sociology of the school. (50-73).  Abingdon, Oxon & New York, NY: Routledge.

Education Review Office. (2013). Secondary schools: Pathways to future education, training and employment:

National Report.    Retrieved               from:      http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Secondary-SchoolsPathways-for-future-education-training-and-employment-July-2013/Findings/Challenges-facing-allsecondary-schools/Curriculum-innovation

Finnerty, C. (2015, 18 September). Making the very very big, small. from inFinnerty and beyond. Blog post. Retrieved from: http://frominfinnerty.blogspot.co.nz/2015/09/making-very-very-big-small.html

Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2012). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

Goodson, I. F. (1992). Preface to the Anniversary Edition. School subjects and curriculum change. (pp. 18-19).

Third Ed. ebook 2002. Bristol,  P.A: & London: Falmer Press.

Grouws, D. A., Tarr, J. E., Chávez, O., Sears, R., Soria, V. M., & Taylan, R. D. (2013). Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students’ mathematics learning from curricula representing subject-specific and integrated content organizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 44(2), 416-463.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY:

Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1), 81-112. DOI:

10.3102/003465430298487

Hobsonville Point Secondary School. (2015). Foundation programme overview. (unpublished internal document).

Karweit, N. L. (1983). Time on task: A research review. Report No. 332. Baltimore, ND: Centre for Social

Organization of Schools. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED228236.pdf

Lichtman, G. (2015). High School of the future? Retrieved from: http://www.grantlichtman.com/category/21cskills/page/2/).

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In, D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Horn, I. S. (2012). Methods for taking a situative approach to studying the development of motivation, identity, and learning in multiple social contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 27(2), 267–284. DOI 10.1007/s10212-011-0086-1

Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development (OECD). (2005). The definition and selection of Key Competencies: Executive summary. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf

Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K.  (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry. 42(2), 191-214. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x

Sewell, W. H. (1992).  A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781191

Siefert, E. H., & Beck, J. J. (1984). Relationships between task time and learning gains in secondary schools. The Journal of Educational Research. 78(1), 5-10. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27540085

Slade, S., & Griffith, D. (2013).  A whole child approach to student success. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy. 10(3), 21-35. Retrieved from: http://eng.kedi.re.kr

Stalling, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher. 9(11), 11-16 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175185

Tobin, D. (2015). School success as a process of structuration. Educational Administration Quarterly. 51(4), 640– 674. DOI: 10.1177/0013161X15569346

Treadwell, M. (2011). Whatever happened? In, G. Wan & D. M. Gut (Eds.), Bringing schools into the 21st century. (pp. 7-40). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993-1994). Synthesis of research: What helps students learn?.

Educational Leadership, December-January 1994, 74-79.

Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools of the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47–70.

Wright, N., & Adam, A. (2015). The ‘critical friend’ role in fostering reflective practices and developing staff cohesion: A case study in a new secondary school, New Zealand. School Leadership and Management, 35(4), 441-457.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS