SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 84-96, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2017-008
License : (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Published Online: 09-June-2019
Increasingly, New Zealand primary and intermediate schools are adopting the concept of flexible learning spaces and promoting team teaching approaches. Such open spaces and pedagogy can be challenging for even experienced teachers to adapt to. Is it realistic, therefore, to expect novices to work successfully in these challenging spaces from the onset of their teaching careers? Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programmes in New Zealand equip graduates with the knowledge and skills to plan, teach and evaluate learning for a diverse class of children with individual learning, social and cultural needs. However, while researching their own practice working within new spaces and pedagogy, some experienced Bay of Plenty intermediate and primary teachers articulated additional necessities for beginning teachers starting out in such complex teaching environments. Analysis of their ideas suggests such spaces require teachers to have particular capabilities if they are to work collaboratively in open learning spaces. This paper argues that ITE programmes and leaders need to be proactive and include appropriate theoretical and pragmatic coursework, to assist student teachers to cultivate the capabilities required of collaborative team members, by the time they graduate.
Adams, R. (1975). Problems of trying to change the behaviour of teachers in the classroom. Education in change in education: A selection of papers from Auckland Centennial World Education Conference, (pp. 102110). Auckland: New Zealand Educational Institute.
Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 315-330.
Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.
Benade, L. (2017). Liberation or chaos? The transformative educative prospects of flexible learning environments. Paper presented at Auckland University of Technology School of Education Symposium. Learning Environments: The Changing Face of New Zealand Education: Preparing, Challenging and Evaluating. AUT North Shore Campus: 14 February.
Brough, C. (2008). Student-centred curriculum integration in action: ‘I was wondering if you could tell me how much one meat patty and one sausage cost?’ set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 9-14.
Cooper, I. (1981). The politics of education and architectural design: The instructive example of British primary education. British Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 125-136. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0141192810070202
Dowden, T. (2012). Implementing curriculum integration: Three easy lessons from past practice. set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 25-31.
Fraser, D., Henderson, C., Price, G., Aitken, V., Cheesman, S., Bevege, F., & Tyson, S. (2009). Examining and disrupting rituals of practice in the primary classroom. Education 3-13, 37(2), 105-119.
Hipkins, R. (2013). Competencies or capabilities: What’s in a name? set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 55-57.
Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Sense Publishers eBook ISBN 9789463005371
Maiers, A. (2008). Habitudes in the classroom: Teaching the habits and attitudes our students need in the 21st century. Retrieved from: changethis.com/manifesto/download/61.05.Habitudes
Ministry of Education. (2014). MLE: Auckland Normal Intermediate Case study (July). Retrieved from: www. education.govt.nz/.../AucklandNormalIntermediateCasestudy-July2014.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2016a). New Zealand Government, Ministry of Education, Four year plan. Retrieved from: http://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/publications/four-year-plan-and-statements-ofintent/four-year-plan-2016-2020/Education.govt.nz website
Ministry of Education. (2016b). Flexible learning spaces webpage. Retrieved from: http://www.education.govt. nz/school/property/state-schools/design-standards/flexible-learning- spaces/
Ministry of Education. (2017). ILE: What’s it all about? Retrieved from: http://ile.education.govt.nz/
Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development (OECD). (2013). Innovative learning environments project. Paris: Centre for Education Research and Innovation. doi:10.1787/97892642033488-en
O’Neill, J., Hansen, S., & Lewis, E. (2014). Dispositions to teach: Review and synthesis of current components and applications, and evidence of impact. Report to the Schooling Policy Group, Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Roth, W-M. (2002). Being and becoming in the classroom. Westport, CT: Ablex. Retrieved from: https://www. questia.com/read/106771494/being-and-becoming-in-the-classroom
Sharratt, L. & Planche, B. (2016). Leading collaborative learning: Empowering excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Silcock L. (2016). Will innovative learning environments work for everyone? Innovative Learning Environments: The CORE Education Blog. Retrieved from: http://blog.core-ed.org/blog/2016/04/will-innovativelearning-environments-work-for-everyone.html
Smardon, D. & Charteris, J. (2016). Knocking down walls and buying new furniture? What are innovative learning environments in NZ schools really about? NZ Principal, 31 (1), 24-26
Te Puke Intermediate School (2016). Powerpoint: Te Puke Intermediate. Paper presented to the NZEI Rural and Teaching Principals’ Conference, 6-8 July, Tauranga, New Zealand.
Thatcher, T. (2013). Learning to learn: Developing learning dispositions. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki. org.nz/Curriculum-stories/Media-gallery/Learning-to-learn/Developing-learning-dispositions
Wallace, G. (1980). Architectural constraints on educational aims and organisations: With particular reference to middle schools. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 12(2), 47-57. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0022062800120206
Whyte, B. (1995). The impact of an integrated teaching programme on learner-centred teaching style.
Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Waikato. New Zealand.
Whyte, B., with Charteris, C. (2008, September 18). ... and the rabbit bobs past!: A developmental classroom. Networkonnet. Retrieved from: http://www.networkonnet.co.nz/index.php?section=curriculum&id=111
Whyte, B., & Knapper, C. (2013). Crafting an interactive museum. In D. Fraser, V. Aitken, & B. Whyte (Eds.), Connecting curriculum; Linking learning (pp. 83–105). Wellington: NZCER Press.
Whyte, B., with McGarvey, R. (1996). A morning in a developmental classroom. Developmental Network, 5, 1.
Whyte, B., House, N., & Keys, N. (2016). Coming out of the closet: From single-cell classrooms to innovative learning environments. Teachers and Curriculum, 16(1) 81-88
Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45-60.
Wray, S. (2007). Teaching portfolios, community, and pre-service teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1139-1152.
Wylie, C. (2011). Opportunities for teacher collaborative practices in a self-managed school system: The NZ experience. Paper presented at the AERA 2011 Annual Meeting, April 8-12, New Orleans.