SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 125-132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2017-011
License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Published Online: 09-June-2019
This story of leading change is written by the Principal and Deputy Principal of Thorrington School in Christchurch where the leadership focus has been to shift curriculum design and teaching practices to be more responsive to the needs of learners. The article considers the shift in the practices of twenty teachers over a three-year time frame. The school does not have purpose built Modern Learning Spaces / Environments (referred to as flexible learning spaces in this article) so considerations for moving towards flexible learning had to start with changing mindsets and pedagogy. Initially there was a group of early up takers from amongst the staff who adapted their classrooms, furniture and processes to implement a change in practice. Although other teachers in the school recognised the success of this team the impetus to change practice across the whole school was largely rhetoric. Over time school wide resultant change was an amalgam of purpose, support, and development of new skills and strategies. Various drivers for change were recognised as being helpful for some teachers but not for others. Changes in teachers’ mindsets happened independently of each other and at different times for different people but together they eventually combined to change the attitudes and behaviours of teachers towards flexible learning practices. Although student achievement data is improving in all areas across the school this article does not track the trajectory of student data for consideration nor does this article address the community consultation process that occurred alongside this journey.
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.
Bisset, J. (2014). The move to modern learning environments in New Zealand secondary schools: Step forward or smokescreen? (Unpublished master’s thesis). Auckland: Unitec Institute of Technology.
Boushey, G., & Moser, J. (2014). Daily Five. Portland, OR: Stenhouse Publishers.
Burke, W. W. (2013). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Campbell, M., Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., & Drew, C. (2013). Issues of teacher professional learning within ‘non-traditional’ classroom environments. Improving Schools, 16(3), 209-222. doi: 10.1177/1365480213501057
Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia, PA: CPRE Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2015). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Dweck, C. (2017). Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. London: Robinson Ltd.
Fullan, M. (2007). Change theory as a force for school improvement. In, Intelligent leadership (pp. 27-39).
Fullan, M. (2010). Positive pressure. In Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 119-130).
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (2014). Change wars. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459-475.
Kotter, J. P. (1986). Why power and influence issues are at the very core of executive work. In S. Srivastva and Associates (Eds.), Executive power: How executives influence people and organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 20-32.
Lawson, E., & Price, C. (2003). The psychology of change management. McKinsey Quarterly, (2) 30-41.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2006). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case study research in education”. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education. (2016). Reference designs for standard classroom block upgrade. Retrieved on February 13, 2017, from http://www.education.govt.nz/school/property/state-schools/design-standards/ flexible-learning-spaces/reference-designs-for-standard-classroom-block-upgrade/
Ministry of Education. (2008). Kiwi leadership for principals: Principals as educational leaders. Wellington:
Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes - What do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175-195.
Osborne, M. (2013). Modern learning environments. The CORE education blog.
Parnell, R., & Procter, L. (2011). Flexibility and place making for autonomy in learning. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(1), 77.
Radcliffe, D. (2009). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, H. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
Stoll, L. (2015). Three greats for a self-improving school system: Pedagogy, professional development and leadership: Teaching schools Research and development network national themes project 2012-14:
Spring 2015. Nottingham: National College for Teaching and Leadership.
Stoll, L., Harris, A., & Handscomb, G. (2012). Great professional development which leads to great pedagogy:
Nine claims from research. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Wenmoth, D. (2014). What’s all this about a modern learning environment? Retrieved on February 13, 2017, from http://www.slideshare.net/dwenmoth/what-is-an-mle-community-presentation
Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice?
Improving Schools, 15(1), 45-60.