Culturally sustaining instructional leadership: Perspectives from Native American public school principals in Montana and Wyoming

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice

New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society

Subject: Education

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1178-8690

DESCRIPTION

28
Reader(s)
92
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 33 (2018)
Volume 32 (2017)
Volume 30 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 33 , ISSUE 2 (December 2018) > List of articles

Culturally sustaining instructional leadership: Perspectives from Native American public school principals in Montana and Wyoming

William Holmes / Suzanne Young

Keywords : Culturally sustaining pedagogy (CSP); culturally sustaining instructional leadership (CSIL); democratic project of schooling; educational leadership; instructional leadership

Citation Information : Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice. Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 17-31, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2018-010

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 02-April-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this quantitative study was to gain a deeper understanding of principal beliefs of an emergent framework called Culturally Sustaining Instructional Leadership (CSIL) developed from a review of literature designed to support the implementation of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy (CSP). Through a detailed review of literature, six instructional elements and five cultural elements were developed to guide principals in the removal of barriers and in support of teacher implementation of CSP. Principals of public schools located on Native American reservations in Montana and Wyoming (USA) were surveyed regarding their beliefs about CSIL practices and if their beliefs differed between instructional elements and cultural elements. Through a reporting of means and paired samples t-testing, the results of this study indicated principals demonstrated a significant preference for working in instructional versus cultural elements. The lowest CSIL element was student empowerment signifying that the voices of Native American students were not being heard. The principals of this study did not have a clear definition of the Democratic Project of Schooling congruent with Paris (2012). The implications of this study are the need for training and awareness in CSP and CSIL to preservice administrators in training and in-service administrators in the field.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

Akom, A. (2009). Critical hip hop pedagogy as a form of liberatory praxis. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(1), 52–66.

Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2012). Leverage leadership: A practical guide to building exceptional schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Beachum, F., & Dentith, A. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. The Educational Forum, 68(3), 276–286.

Blase, J. (1988). The everyday political perspective of teachers: Vulnerability and conservatism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(2), 125–142.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives of how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130–141.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Brown, K. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77–108.

Bushnell, M. (2017). Teachers in the schoolhouse panopticon: Complicity and resistance. In S. Ball, (Ed.), Sociology of Education II (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Routledge.

Carraway, J., & Young, T. (2015). Implementation of a districtwide policy to improve principals’ instructional leadership: Principals’ sensemaking of the skillful observation and coaching laboratory. Educational Policy, 29(1), 230–256.

Corson, D. (1998). Community-based education for indigenous cultures. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 11(3), 238–249.

Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Alexandria, VA:  ASCD.

Dowden, T. (2011). Locating curriculum integration within the historical context. History of Educational Review, 40(1), 47–61.

DuFour, R. (1991). The principal as staff developer. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T., & Mattos, M. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Epstein, J. (2010). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 81–96.

Epstein, J. (2011). School family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Evans, A. (2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159–188.

Finnigan, K., & Stewart, T. (2009). Leading change under pressure: An examination of principal  leadership in low-performing schools. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 586–618.

Gaines, K. (2007). A communicative theory of leadership practice (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts. (UMI No. 3285362).

Gerstl-Pepin, C., & Aiken, J. (2009). Democratic school leaders: Defining ethical leadership in a  standardized context. Journal of School Leadership, 19(4), 406–444.

Hattori, M. (2016). Culturally sustaining leadership: A Pacific islander’s perspective. Education Sciences, 6(4), 1–10.

Holmes, W. T. (2012). The motivating language of principals: A sequential transformative strategy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv. edu/thesesdissertations/1740

Holmes, W. T, & Parker, M. A. (2018). The relationship between behavioural integrity, competence, goodwill, trustworthiness and motivating language of a principal. School Leadership & Management, 38(4),

435–456. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1430687

Horsford, S., Grosland, T., & Gunn, K. (2011). Pedagogy of the personal and professional: Toward a framework for culturally relevant leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 21(4), 582–606.

Houston, P., & Sokolow, S. (2006). The spiritual dimension of leadership: 8 key principles to leading more effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (2009). Instructional leadership: A research-based guide to learning in schools. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Jaeger, E. (2013). Teacher reflection: Supports, barriers, and results. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(1), 89– 104.

Johnson, L. (2006). Making her community a better place to live: Culturally responsive urban school leadership in historical context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, (5)1, 19–36.

Johnson, S. (1983). Teacher unions in schools: Authority and accommodation. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 309–326.

Kelchtermans, G. (2011). Vulnerability in teaching: The moral and political roots of a structural condition. In C. Day and J. Chi-Kin Lee, (Eds.), New understandings of teacher’s work: Emotions and educational change (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Springer.

Khalifa, M. (2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 424–467.

Khalifa, M., Gooden, M., & Davis, J. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement and Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto.

Mayfield, J. (2009). Motivating language: A meaningful guide for leader communications. Development and Learning in Organizations, 23(1), 9–11.

Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2015). The effects of leader motivating language use on employee decision making. International Journal of Business Communications, doi:10.1177/2329488415572787.

McCarty, T., & Lee, T. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101–124.

McGoff, C. (2012). The primes. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mitchell, R., Kensler, L., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2015). Examining the effects of instructional leadership on school academic press and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 223–251.

Morton, S., Bandara, D., Robinson, E., & Carr., P. (2012). In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 106–108.

O’Hair, M., & Reitzug, U. (1997). Restructuring schools for democracy: Principals’ perspectives. Journal of School Leadership, 7(4), 266–286.

Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

Paris, D., & Alim, H. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.

Postholm, M. (2008). Teachers developing practice: Reflection as key activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1717–1728.

Ross, F. (1989). Axioms for organizers. Retrieved from https://libraries.ucsd.edu/farmworkermovement/essays/ essays/MillerArchive/064%20Axioms%20For%20Organizers.pdf

Santamaŕia, L., & Santamaŕia, A. (2016). Toward culturally sustaining leadership: Innovation beyond ‘school improvement’ promoting equity in diverse contexts. Education Sciences, 6(33), 1–8.

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Scheurich, J. (1998). Highly successful and loving, public elementary schools populated mainly by low-SES children of color: Core beliefs and cultural characteristics. Urban Education, 33(4), 451–491.

Sleeter, C., & Carmona, J. (2017). Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Tschannen-Moran, T., & Hoy, W. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.

Tschannen-Moran, T. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tschannen-Moran, T., & Gareis, C. (2015). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies, 5, 256– 276.

Woods, P. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS