Core professional values for school leaders and teachers: Piloting an online tool

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice

New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society

Subject: Education

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1178-8690

DESCRIPTION

24
Reader(s)
50
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 33 (2018)
Volume 32 (2017)
Volume 30 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 33 , ISSUE 2 (December 2018) > List of articles

Core professional values for school leaders and teachers: Piloting an online tool

Susan Lovett

Keywords :  Professional values; leadership as activity; leadership values; leadership partnerships; disciplined dialogue; decision making

Citation Information : Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice. Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 72-89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2018-014

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 02-April-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Evidence of the extent to which school leaders and teachers embrace core professional values may, through dialogue, open up new avenues for school improvement. With this in mind, the focus of this article is the piloting of an online survey tool designed to identify how widely four such values are held in New Zealand schools. The pilot was commissioned by the Te Ariki Trust with the support of the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI), the New Zealand Principals’ Federation (NZPF) and the University of Canterbury. The tool is based on items which together, define four values underpinning the mission of the Te Ariki Trust, namely “Professional Discretion”, “Collegial Obligation”, “Reflective Inquiry and Discourse” and “Evidencebased Professional Practice”. An analysis of one school’s responses to such a survey tool is one way to gauge evidence of collective commitment, the strength of collegial relationships and trust, with the realisation that knowing how to collect and reflect on data matters if important decisions are to be well informed. The article draws upon research and scholarly writing to explain the four values, describe the development of the tool and its pilot study and suggest what the results might offer for dialogue using the findings from a sample school whose staff members completed the instrument. Suggested changes to the instrument and its use conclude the article.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers’ development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49(7), 108–117.

Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. (2017). Educational leadership and context. Rendering of an inseparable relationship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 167–182.

Coleman, A. (2011). Towards a blended model for school-based collaborations. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(3), 296–316.

Collinson, D., & Collinson, M. (2006). ‘Blended leadership’: Employee perspectives on effective leadership in the UK FE sector. The nature of leadership. Lancaster: Centre for Excellence in Leadership.

Curry, K.A., Mwavita, M., Holter, A., & Harris, E. (2016). Getting assessment right at the classroom level: Using formative assessment for decision making. Educational Assessment Evaluation & Accountability, 28(1), 89–104.

Cutajar, M., & Bezzina, C. (2013). Collaboration: Joint working by individual state-maintained schools in a new statutory system in the Maltese islands. Management in Education, 27(1), 19–24.

Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., & Brown, E. (2010). 10 strong claims about successful leadership. Nottingham: National College of Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services.

Dempster, N., Townsend, T., Johnson, G., Bayetto, A., Lovett, S., & Stevens, E. (2017). Leadership and literacy. Principals, partnerships and pathways to improvement. Cham: Springer.

Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.

Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of educational professionals.

British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.

Ghamrawi, N. (2011). Trust me: Your school can be better – A message from teachers to principals. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 39(3), 333–348.

Gurr, D. (2014). Successful school leadership across contexts and cultures. Leading & Managing, 20(2), 75–88.

Hallam, P.R., Smith, H.R., Hite, J.M., Hite, S.J., & Wilcox, B.R. (2015). Trust and collaboration in PLC teams: Teacher relationships, principal support, and collaborative benefits. NASSP Bulletin, 99(3), 193–216.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M.T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism when teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). System redesign for system capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 685–700.

Harris, A., Jones, M., & Huffman, J.B. (Eds.) (2017). Teachers leading educational reform: The power of professional learning communities. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://www-taylorfrancis-com. ezproxy.canterbury.ac.nz/books/9781317247890

Hoyle, E. (2008). Changing conceptions of teaching as a profession: Personal reflections. In D. Johnson & R. Maclean (Eds.), Teaching: Professionalization, development and leadership (pp.285–305). Dordrecht: Springer.

Kaser, L., & Halbert, J. (2014). Creating and sustaining inquiry spaces for teacher learning and system transformation. European Journal of Education, 49(2), 206–217.

Lin, H., Hong, Z., Yang, K., & Lee, S. (2013). The impact of collaborative reflections on teachers' inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3095-3116. doi:10.1080/0950069

3.2012.689023

Lovett, S. (2002). Teachers’ talk helps learning: The quality learning circle approach. SET, 1, 25–27.

Lovett S. (2016). Values for New Zealand school leadership: Literature review for the Te Ariki Trust.

Christchurch: University of Canterbury. Commissioned by Te Ariki Trust. http://hdl.handle.

net/10092/14982

Marsh, J.A., & Farrell, C.C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. doi: 10.1177/1741143214537229.

McLaughlin, M. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.). The roots of educational change (pp. 58–72). Dordrecht: Springer. Ministry of Education. (2018). Investing in Educational Success Policy. https://www.education.govt. nz/ministry-of-education/specific-initiatives/investing-in-educational-success/.       Accessed               21 September 2018.

NcNiff, J. (2002). Action research. Principles and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

Mertler, C.A. (2006). Action research. Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Moore, T. A., & Rutherford, D. (2012). Primary strategy learning networks: A local study of a national initiative. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(1), 69–83.

Parr, J.M., & Timperley, H.S. (2015). Exemplifying a continuum of collaborative engagement: Raising literacy achievement of at-risk students in New Zealand. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1), 29–41.

Peus, C., Braun, S., & Schyns, B. (Eds.) (2016). Leadership lessons from compelling contexts. Bingley: Emerald.

Robertson, J. (2016). Coaching leadership. Building educational leadership capacity through coaching partnership. Wellington: NZCER.

Rusche, N., & Jason, K. (2011). “You have to absorb yourself in it”: Using inquiry and reflection to promote student learning and self-knowledge. Teaching Sociology, 39(4), 338–353.

Schmuck, R.A. (2006). Practical action research for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Smith, R., & Starmer, L. (2017). Building adaptive expertise: Professional learning that works with teachers, not on them. Australian Educational Leader, 39(4), 22–25.

Stewart, D., & Prebble. T. (1993). The reflective principal. School development within a learning community. Palmerston North: ERDC Press.

Swaffield, S., & Dempster, N. (2009). A learning dialogue (principle 3). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.) Connecting leadership and learning (pp. 106–120). Abingdon: Routledge.

Te Ariki Trust. (2018). www.arikiproject.ac.nz/about/. Accessed 21 September 2018.

Timperley, H. (2015). Professional conversations & improvement focused feedback. A review of the

research literature on practice & student outcomes. Retrieved from aitsl.edu.au/professionalgrowth/research/professional-converations-literature-review-oct-2015.pdf

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS