SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Journal of Epileptology. Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 103-112, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/joepi-2015-0032
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Received Date : 07-May-2015 / Accepted: 07-October-2015 / Published Online: 20-October-2015
Introduction. The correct diagnosis of epileptic seizures and non-epileptic attacks has a decisive influence on treatment, counseling and duration of possible work limitations. Diagnostic efforts should aim towards classifying the seizure as precisely as possible. For risk assessments, e.g. at the workplace, a close cooperation and networking of all professionals involved in the epilepsy treatment, care and consultation processes is required.
Aim. To present guidelines for assessment of occupational capacity of persons with epilepsy and to discuss their value in clinical practice.
Method and Material. The German employer’s liability insurance association has recently published the new revised BGI 585 Risk Assessment Guidelines (DGUV information 250-001) framework and assistance in epilepsy in view of protection against unfair dismissal. These guidelines provide information on safety and health in the workplace. Throughout all the German federal states, 24 Network teams were established. During the period January 2010 and December 2013, 374 employees with epilepsy were consulted by an expert member of Network Epilepsy and Work (NEA) Team, of which 80 were prospectively included in a study and scientifically evaluated.
Guidelines and discussion. While conducting the risk assessment, a special medical fact check in accordance with the guidelines was used. In addition to medical aspects, the individual vocational and occupational situation was considered. Based on this assessment an individual recommendation was made relating to continuation of employment. The project NEA established regional teams of physicians, therapists, consultants from social services, employment offices and rehabilitation authorities across Germany in order to link by networks the complex medical and social aspects of reducing the risk of people with epilepsy losing their job.
Results. It was shown that support and consultation through the NEA team led to an endangered position of employment being maintained in 70% of cases.
Conclusion. In many cases, loss of employment can be prevented by consequent application of DGUV information 250-001 (recently revised from BGI 585) for risk assessment of epilepsy in employment, together with improved networking between medical professionals, occupational health professionals and social services.
Balamurugan E., Aggarwal M., Lamba A., Dang N., Tripathi M.: Perceived trigger factors of seizures in persons with epilepsy. Seizure, 2013, 22: 743–747.
Bautista R.E., Shapovalov D., Saada F., Pizzi M.A.: The societal integration of individuals with epilepsy: perspectives for the 21st. Epilepsy Behav., 2014, 35: 42–49.
Benbadis S.R.: How many patients with pseudoseizures receive antiepileptic drugs prior to diagnosis? Eur. Neurol., 1999, 41: 114–115.
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Information. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Information für Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit BGI 585: Empfehlungen zur Beurteilung beruflicher Möglichkeiten von Personen mit Epilepsie. s. l: Carl Heymanns Verlag, Januar 2007.
Chowdhury R.N., Hasan M.H., Rahman K.M., Dev S.R., Amin M.A., Miah T.: Precipitating factor of seizure in epilepsy: experience in a tertiary care. Mymensingh Med. J., 2014, 23: 56–61.
De Boer H.M.: Overview and Perspectives of Employment in People with Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 2005, 46 (Suppl. 1): 52–54.
DGUV Information 250-001. Berufliche Beurteilung bei Epilepsie und nach erstem epileptischen Anfall. Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung e.V. (DGUV), Berlin, January 2015.
Fisher R.S. Acevedo C., Arzimanoglou A., Bogacz A., Cross J.H., Elger C.E., Engel J. Jr. et al: ILAE official report: A practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia, 2014, 55: 475–482.
Josephson C., Rahey S., Sadler R.M.: Neurocardiogenic Syncope: Frequency and Consequences of its Misdiagnosis as Epilepsy. Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 2007, 34: 221–224.
Lesser R.P.: Psychogenic Seizures. Neurology, 1996, 46: 1499–1507.
Martikainen K.K., Seppä K., Viita P.M., Rajala S.A., Luukkaala T.H., Keränen T.: Outcome and consequences according to the type of transient loss of consciousness: 1-year followup study among primary health care patients. J. Neurol., 2011, 258: 132–136.
Reuber M., Elger C.E.: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update. Epilepsy Behav., 2003, 4: 205–216.
Scheepers B., Clough P., Pickles C.: The misdiagnosis of epilepsy: findings of a population study. Seizure, 1998, 7: 403–406.
Sigurdardottir K.R., Olafson E.: Incidence of psychogenic seizures in adults: a population-based study in Iceland. Epilepsia, 1998, 39: 749–752.
Smeets V.M., Lierop B.A., Vanhoutin J.P., Aldenkamp A.P., Nijhuis F.J.: Epilepsy and employment: literature review. Epilepsy Behav., 2007, 10: 354–362.
Stefan H.: Epilepsien: Diagnose und Behandlung. Thieme, Stuttgart – New York 1999, 350–351.
Thorbecke R., May T.W., Koch-Stoecker S., Ebner A., Bien C.G., Specht U.: Effects of an inpatient rehabilitation program after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery and other factors on employment 2 years after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia, 2014, 55: 725–733.
Wassenaar M., Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité D.G., de Haan G.J., Carpay J.A., Leijten F.S.: Seizure precipitans in a community- based epilepsy cohort. J. Neurol., 2014; online DOI10.1007/s00415-014-7252-8.
Zaidi A., Clough P., Cooper P., Scheepers B., Fitzpatrick A.P.: Misdiagnosis of epilepsy: many seizure-like attacks have a cardiovascular cause. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2000, 36: 181–184.