Distribution and Longevity of Pratylenchus penetrans in the Red Raspberry Production System

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Nematology

Society of Nematologists

Subject: Life Sciences

GET ALERTS DONATE

ISSN: 0022-300X
eISSN: 2640-396X

DESCRIPTION

14
Reader(s)
44
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 48 , ISSUE 4 (December 2016) > List of articles

Distribution and Longevity of Pratylenchus penetrans in the Red Raspberry Production System

DUNCAN R. KROESE / JERRY E. WEILAND / INGA A. ZASADA *

Keywords : fumigation, root-lesion nematode, Rubus, soil type, survival.

Citation Information : Journal of Nematology. Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 241-247, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2017-032

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 13-May-2016 / Published Online: 21-July-2017

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

One of the major constraints on the production of red raspberries in the Pacific Northwest is the presence of the rootlesion
nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. Current management of this nematode relies heavily on preplant soil fumigation; however,
regulations have made the practice more difficult and expensive. Additional issues with soil fumigation include lack of efficacy at deeper soil depths and potential inability to penetrate raspberry root material that remains in the field during fumigation which may harbor P. penetrans. To address these issues, two field experiments were conducted in northwestern Washington. In the first experiment, the residency time of P. penetrans in root material from the previous raspberry crop, which was terminated with or without the use of herbicides, was monitored over time. Pratylenchus penetrans was found in root material from 6 to 8 mon after the crop was terminated, and herbicide application did not reduce P. penetrans residency time compared to untreated root material. In a second experiment, the vertical distribution of P. penetrans at three different times during the field establishment process (pre- and postfumigation, and at planting) was determined at two locations. Both locations had detectable prefumigation P. penetrans populations at all depths. However, postfumigation populations showed a different distribution pattern between locations. The location with coarser soil had populations located mainly at shallower depths with a maximum of 44 P. penetrans/100 g soil at 16 to 30 cm deep, whereas the location with finer soil had populations located mainly at deeper depths with a maximum of 8 P. penetrans/100 g soil at 76 to 90 cm deep. At planting, distribution tended to equilibrate among depths at both locations, but the overall population pattern across depth at each location was similar to that observed at postfumigation. Understanding more about the residency time and distribution of this nematode may provide growers with information that can be used to more effectively target P. penetrans.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. Belair, G., and Khanizadeh, S. 1994. Distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in strawberry and raspberry fields inQuebec. Phytoprotection 72:21–25.
  2. Castillo, P., and Vovlas, N. 2007. Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae). Diagnosis, biology, pathogenicity and management. Leiden, the Netherlands: Nematology Monographs & Perspectives.
  3. Davis, E. L., and MacGuidwin, A. E. 2005. Lesion nematode disease. The Plant Health Instructor (June 21, 2015). American Phytopathological Society. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2000-1030-02, http://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/Nematodes/Pages/LesionNematode.aspx.
  4. Eissenstat, D. M. 1992. Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15:763–782.
  5. Forge, T. A., DeYoung, R., and Vrain, T. C. 1998. Temporal changes in the vertical distribution of Pratylenchus penetrans under raspberry. Journal of Nematology 30:179–183.
  6. Forge, T. A., Larney, F. J., Kawchuk, L. M., Pearson, D. C., Koch, C.,and Blackshaw, R. E. 2015. Crop rotation effects on Pratylenchus neglectus populations in the root zone of irrigated potatoes in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 37:363–368.
  7. Gigot, J. A., Zasada, I. A., and Walters, T. W. 2013a. Integration of brassicaceous seed meals into red raspberry production systems. Applied Soil Ecology 64:23–31.
  8. Gigot, J. A., Zasada, I. A., and Walters, T. W. 2013b. Impact and occurrence of Phytophthora rubi and Pratylenchus penetrans in commercial red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) fields in northwestern Washington.
    International Journal of Fruit Science 13:357–372.
  9. Haar,M. J., Fennimore, S. A., Ajwa, H. A., and Winterbottom, C. Q. 2003. Chloropicrin effect on weed seed viability. Crop Protection 22:109–115.
  10. Howland, A. D., Schreiner, R. P., and Zasada, I. A. 2014. Spatial distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in semi-arid Vitis vinifera vineyards in Washington. Journal of Nematology 46:321–330.
  11. Ingham, R. E. 1994. Nematodes. Pp. 459–490 in S. H. Michelson, ed. Methods of soil analysis part 2: Microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
  12. Kimpinski, J., and Dunn, R. A. 1985. Effect of low temperatures in the field and laboratory on survival of Pratylenchus penetrans. Plant Disease 69:526–527.
  13. MacGuidwin, A. E., and Forge, T. A. 1991. Winter survival of Pratylenchus scribneri. Journal of Nematology 23:198–204.
  14. Mani, A. 1999. Survival of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus jordanensis Hashum in a fallow field after harvest of alfalfa. Nematology 1:79–84.
  15. Martin, F. N. 2003. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Annual Review of Phytopathology 41:325–350.
  16. McElroy, F. D. 1977. Effect of two nematode species on establishment, growth, and yield of raspberry. Plant Disease Reporter 61:277–279.
  17. McElroy, F. D. 1991. Nematode parasites. Pp. 59–62 in M. A. Ellis, R. H. Converse, R.N.Williams, and B.Williamson, eds. Compendiumof raspberry and blackberry diseases and insects. St. Paul, MN: APS Press.
  18. McElroy, F. D. 1992. A plant health care program for brambles in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Nematology 24:457–462.
  19. McGovern, R. J., Vavrina, C. S., Noling, J. W., Datnoff, L. A., and Yonce, H. D. 1998. Evaluation of application methods of metam sodium for management of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato in Southwest Florida. Plant Disease 82:919–923.
  20. McKenry, M. V., and Thomason, I. J. 1974. 1, 3-dichloropropene and 1, 2-dibromoethance compounds: I. Movement and fate as affected by various conditions in several solid; II. Organism-dosage response studies
    in the laboratory with several nematode species. Hilgardia 42:392–438.
  21. McSorley, R. 2003. Adaptations of nematodes to environmental extremes. Florida Entomologist 86:138–142.
  22. Pudasaini, M. P., Schomaker, C. H., Been, T. H., and Moens, M.2006. Vertical distribution of plant-parasitic nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans, under four field crops. Phytopathology 96:226–233.
  23. Qin, R., Gao, S., and Ajwa, H. 2013. Emission and distribution of fumigants as affected by soil moistures in three different textured soils. Chemosphere 90:66–872.
  24. Ristaino, J. B., and Thomas, W. 1997. Agriculture, methyl bromide,and the ozone hole: Can we fill the gaps. Plant Disease 81:964–977.3
  25. Stirling, G. R., Blair, B. L., Pattemore, J. A., Garside, A. L., and Bell, M. J. 2001. Changes in nematode populations on sugarcane following fallow, fumigation and crop rotation, and implications for the role
    of nematodes in yield decline. Australian Plant Pathology 30:323–335.
  26. Thies, W. G., and Nelson, E. E. 1987. Reduction of Phellinus weirii inoculum in Douglas fir stumps by the fumigants chloropicrin, vorlex or methylisothiocyanate. Forest Science 33:316–329.
  27. Thomas, W. B. 1996. Methyl bromide: Effective pest management tool and environmental threat. Journal of Nematology 28:586–589.
  28. Townsend, J. L. 1973. Survival of Pratylenchus penetrans and P. minyus in two Ontario soils. Nematologica 19:35–42.
  29. Townsend, J. L., and Webber, L. R. 1971. Movement of Pratylenchus penetrans and the moisture characteristics of three Ontario soils. Nematologica 17:47–57.
  30. Trudgill, D. L., and Brown, D. J. F. 1978. Pratylenchus penetrans: A potential pest of raspberries in Scotland. Plant Pathology 27:101.
  31. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Noncitrus fruits and nuts 2015 summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/NoncFruiNu//2010s/2016/NoncFruiNu-07-06-2016.pdf.
  32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. Soil fumigant mitigation factsheet: phase 2 site-specific fumigant management plans and post-application summaries. (October 21, 2015).
    http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-10/documents/sfmphase2-sitespec-mgmnt-plans-2012.pdf.
  33. Walters, T. W., Pinkerton, J. N., Riga, E., Zasada, I. A., Partika, M.,Yoshida, H. A., and Ishida, C. 2009. Managing plant-parasitic nematodes in established red raspberry fields. HortTechnology 19:762–768.
  34. Wilcox, W. F., Scott, P. H., Hamm, P. B., Kennedy, D. M.,Duncan, J. M., Brasier, C. M., and Hansen, E. M. 1993. Identity of a Phytophthora species attacking raspberry in Europe and North American. Mycological Research 97:817–831.
  35. Wilder, K. L., and Righetti, T. L. 1991. Identifying nutrient deficiency and toxicity in red raspberry (February 2, 2016). Pacific Northwest Extension. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/33476/pnw3721991.pdf?sequence=3.
  36. Zasada, I. A., Halbrendt, J. M., Kokalis-Burelle, N., LaMondia, J.,McKenry, M. V., and Noling, J. W. 2010. Managing nematodes without methyl bromide. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48:311–328.
  37. Zasada, I. A., Weiland, J. E., Han, Z., Walters, T. W., and Moore, P.2015. Impact of Pratylenchus penetrans on establishment of red raspberry. Plant Disease 99:939–946.
  38. Zunke, U. 1990. Observations on the invasion and endoparasitic behavior of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. Journal of Nematology 22:309–320.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS