SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Journal of Social Structure. Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 0-0, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2018-001
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Published Online: 11-March-2018
The main aim of this study is twofold: first, to examine the underlying structure of coauthorship in Indian economics; and second, to explore the link between the participation in scientific collaborations and academic visibility. We decipher the structure of co-authorship by presenting collaboration networks of scholars who published articles in six Indian economics journals during 1966-2005, which is split into four windows: 1966-75, 1976-85, 1986-95, and 1996-2005. In this study, the following social network measures are applied: the size of the network, the size of the main component, average degree, path length, and clustering coefficient. The study presents the following three features of Indian economics: first, a substantial proportion of Indian authors are isolated, albeit declining very slowly over a period of time; second, it appears that the structure of scholarly collaboration in Indian economics is highly fragmented, and the observed size of main components accounts for a small proportion of the total authors; third, and more importantly, the size and composition of co-authorship networks presented in the paper seldom impact the scientific visibility of authors.
Ahuja, G. (2000), Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 425-455
Albert, R. And Barabási A-L (2002), Statistical Mechanisms of complex Networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, January, pp. 47-97
Barabási A-L, Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T. (2002) ‘Evolution of the Social Network of Scientific Collaborations’, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311 (3-4): 590–614.
Barabási, A. L., and Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 50-59. Bollobas, B (1985), Random Graphs, Academic Press, New York
Bino Paul, G.D., Subash, S., and Ramanathan, A. (2005). Concentration in knowledge output: A case of economics journals, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2, 261-278
Borgatti, S.P, Everett, M.G., and L.C. (2002), ‘Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, M A, Analytic Technologies
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S (2004), Structural holes and good ideas, American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399 Carley, K. M. (1986a). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 12, 137- 189
Carley, K. M. (1986b). Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon, Instructional Science, 14, 381-438
Contractor Noshir, Carley K, Levitt R, Monge P, Wasserman S, Bar F, Fulk J, Hollingshead A and Kunz J (2000), Co-evolution of knowledge networks and 21st-century organizational forms: computational modeling and empirical testing, Working Paper TEC2000-01, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Cowan, Robin and Dominique Foray (1997). ‘The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge’. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 595-622.
Cowan, Robin., Paul A. David and Dominique Foray (2000). ‘The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.9: 2. pp. 211-253.
Cowan, Robin. and Nicolas, Jonard. (2004) “Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28 (8): 1557-1575.
Earl, Peter E. (1983) A Behavioural Theory of Economists Behaviour, in Alfred S. Eichner (ed.), Why Economics is Not Yet a Science, New York: M. E. Sharpe
Flashman, J and Gambetta, D. (2014), Thick as thieves: Homophily and trust among deviants, Rationality and Society, 26 (1), 3–45.
Gingras, Yves and Sébastien Mosbah-Natanson (2010): “Where Are Social Sciences Produced?” in UNESCO and ISSC (ed.), World Social Science Report 2010 (Paris: UNESCO)
Goyal, S., Van Der Leij, M. J., & Moraga‐González, J. L. (2006). Economics: An emerging small world. Journal of political economy, 114(2), 403-412.
Granovetter, Mark (1973), The strength of weak ties, the American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, Mark. (1985), Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness", The American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481-510.
Granovetter, M. (2005) ‘The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1):33-50.
Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., Luís A., Amaral, N( 2005), Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance, Science 308, 697
Hodgson, G.M., & Rothman, H. (1999) ‘The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly, Economic Journal, 109, F165-F186.
Hudson, John (1996), ‘Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics." Journal of Economic Perspectives 10:153-58.
Klamer, Arjo. & Hendrik, P. van, Dalen. (2002). “Attention and the Art of Scientific Publishing”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(3): 289-315.
Krishna, Venni, V and Krishna, Usha (2010): ‘Social Sciences in South Asia’ in UNESCO and ISSC (ed.), World Social Science Report 2010 (Paris: UNESCO)
Langlois, R, N. (2001). ‘Knowledge, Consumption and Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11:77-93
Latora, V and Marchiori, M (2003), Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks, The European Physical Journal B, 32, 249–263
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. (2001), Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444
McKnight, L.W and Cukor, P (2001), Knowledge networks, the internet, and development,
Sloan Working Paper 4193-01 accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=290133
Milgram, Stanley. (1967). “The Small World Problem”, Psychology Today, 2:60-87
Moody, James, (2004) ‘The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963-1999”, American Sociological Review, 69:pp213-238
Mukhopadhyay, T. and Sarkar, S. (2010) “Rankings of economics journals and departments in India. Working Paper WP-2010-021. Mumbai, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research
Newman, M. E. J. (2000), Models of the Small World, Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 101, Nos. 3/4.
Newman, M.E.J. (2001) ‘The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98(2): 404-409.
Newman, M E J. (2003) ‘The Structure and Function of Complex Networks’, SIAM Review, 45(2):167-256.
Prell, Christina and Yi-Jung Lo (2016), Network formation and knowledge gains, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40:1, 21-52.
Reagans, Ray and McEvily, Bill (2003) Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 240- 267.
Reagans, R and Zuckerman, E. W. (2001), Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams, Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517.
Romer, Paul M.(1990). Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), part 2.
Scott, J. (2000), Social Network Analysis, a Handbook, Second edition, Sage Publications, London
Skvoretz, J. (2013), Diversity, integration, and social ties: Attraction versus repulsion as drivers of intra- and intergroup relations, American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 486–517
Travers, Jeffrey. and S. Milgram (1969) ‘An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem’, Sociometry, Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 425-443
Uzzi, Brian, Luis Amaral, and Felix Reed-Tsochas (2007) ‘Small-World Networks and Management Science Research: a Review’, European Management Review, 4: 77–91
Uzzi, B., and Lancaster, R. (2003), Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients, Management Science, 49(4), 383–399.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Watts and Strogatz, (1998), ‘Collective Dynamics of Small World Networks’, Nature, 393 (6684): 440-442.