Structural Balance and Signed International Relations


Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Social Structure

International Network for Social Network Analysis

Subject: Social Sciences


eISSN: 1529-1227





Volume / Issue / page

Volume 22 (2021)
Volume 21 (2020)
Volume 20 (2019)
Volume 19 (2018)
Volume 18 (2017)
Volume 17 (2016)
Volume 16 (2015)
Volume 15 (2014)
Volume 14 (2013)
Volume 13 (2012)
Volume 12 (2011)
Volume 11 (2010)
Volume 10 (2009)
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 1 (December 2015) > List of articles

Structural Balance and Signed International Relations

Patrick Doreian / Andrej Mrvar

Citation Information : Journal of Social Structure. Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1-49, DOI:

License : (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Published Online: 13-August-2019



We use balance theoretic ideas to study the dynamics of the international system of nations in a network of signed relations from 1946 through 1999. Using the Correlates of War data for this period, we apply pre-specified signed blockmodeling to characterize the fundamental structure of this network. Even though the system expanded greatly with many ties being created and/or destroyed, the basic structure remained the same but with new positions being added over time. The blockmodels generated temporal measures of imbalance, as did the counts of imbalanced triples. Regardless of using the line index of imbalance or the number of imbalanced 3-cycles, the results provided decisive evidence contradicting the balance theoretic hypothesis of signed networks moving towards balanced states. Structural balance theory remains very useful by pointing to the more important study of how and why signed networks move towards and away from balance at different points over time. Some major methodological problems for studying signed networks, regardless of whether they involve nations or human actors, were raised and addressed. Proposals for future research are suggested for modeling and understanding the dynamics of signed networks.

Content not available PDF Share



Abell, P. and Ludwig, M., (2009): “Structural balance, a dynamic perspective,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 33: 1-27.

Barnett, M. (2011): “Social constructivism” (pp 148-165) in Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (Eds.) The Globalisation of World Politics (5th Edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Batagelj, V., Doreian, P., Ferligoj, A. and Kejžar N. (2014): Understanding Large Temporal Networks and Spatial Networks: Exploration, Pattern Searching, Visualization and Network Evolution. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Batagelj, V. and Mrvar, A. (1998): “Pajek: A program for large network analysis,” Connections 21, 2: 4757.

Beckfield, J. (2010): “The social structure of the world polity,” American Journal of Sociology 115, 4: 1018-68.

Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E. and Nordstrom, T. (2004): “Do international organizations promote peace?” World Politics 57: 1–38.

Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M.G. (1999): “Models of core/periphery structures,” Social Networks 21: 375395.

Brusco, M. J., Doreian, P., Mrvar, A. and Steinley, D. (2011): “Two algorithms for relaxed structural balance partitioning: Linking theory, methods and data to understand social network phenomena.” Sociological Methods and Research 40: 57-87. 

Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956): “Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory.” Psychological Review 63: 277-292.

Davis, J. A. (1967): “Clustering and structural balance in graphs,” Human Relations 20: 181-187. 

de Nooy, W. (2008): “Signs over time: Statistical and visual analysis of a longitudinal signed network,” Journal of Social Structure 9:

de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., and Batagelj, V. (2011): Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2007): Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions, Psychometrika 72: 563-581.

Diel, P. F. (1996): “What are they fighting for? The importance of issues in international conflict research,” Journal of Peace Research 29: 333-344.

Diel, P. F. and Goetz, G (1988): “Territorial exchanges and militarized conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33, 1: 103-122.

Diel, P. F. and Goetz, G (1991): “Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816-1980,” Political Geographical Quarterly 10, 4: 342-355.

Doreian, P. (1980): On the evolution of group and network structure,” Social Networks 2: 229-246.

Doreian, P., Batagelj, V. and Ferligoj, A. (2005): Generalized Blockmodeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Doreian, P., Kapuscinski, R., Krackhardt, D. and Szczypula, J. (1996): “A brief history of balance through time,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21: 113-131. Reprinted in Doreian, P. and Stokman, F. N. (Eds.) Evolution of Social Networks. New York: Gordon and Breach, 129-147. 

Doreian, P. and Krackhardt, D. (2001): “Pre-transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25, 1: 43-67.

Doreian, P., Lloyd, P. and Mrvar, A. (2013): “Fitting large signed two-mode blockmodels: Problems and prospects,” Social Networks 35: 178-203.

Doreian, P. and Mrvar, A. (1996): “A partitioning approach to structural balance,” Social Networks 18: 149-168.

Doreian, P. and Mrvar, A. (2009): “Partitioning signed social networks,” Social Networks 31:  1-11.

Doreian, P. and Mrvar, A. (2015): “Identifying fragments in networks for structural balance and tracking the levels of balance over time,” Submitted.

Doreian, P. and Stokman, F. N. (1996): Evolution of Social Networks, New York: Gordon and Breach.

Ferligoj, A., Doreian, P. and Batagelj, V. (2011): “Positions and roles,” in Scott, J. and Carrington, P.J. (Eds.) Social Network Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 434-446.

Hafner-Burton, E. M. and Montgomery, A. H. (2006): “Power positions: International organizations, social networks and conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, 6: 3-27.

Hanneman, R. F. and Riddle, M. (2011): “A brief introduction to analyzing social network data,” in Scott, J. and Carrington, P.J. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 331-339.

Harary, F. (1961): “A structural analysis of the situation in the Middle East in 1956,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 5, 2: 167-178.

Harary, F., Norman, R. Z. and Cartwright, D. (1965): Structural Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Healy, B. and Stein, A, (1973): “The balance of power in international history,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 17: 33-61.

Heider, F. (1946): “Attitudes and cognitive organization,” Journal of Psychology 21: 107-112; 58: 5-21.

Heider, F. (1958): The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

Hense, P.R. (2001): “Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas,” International Studies Quarterly 45: 81-109.

Hopf, T. (1998): “The promise of constructivism in international relations theory,” International Security 23, 1: 171-200.

Hummon, N. P. and Doreian, P. (2003) “Some dynamics of social balance processes: Bringing Heider back into balance theory,” Social Networks 25: 17-49.

Ingram, P., Robinson, J. and Busch, M. E. (2005): “The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance,” American Journal of Sociology 111, 3): 824-858.

Jacobson, H. K., W. M. Reisinger, and T. Mathers. (1986): “National entanglements in international governmental organizations,” American Political Science Review 80, 1: 141-59.

Jones, D.M., Bremer, S.A. and Singer, J.D. (1996): “Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 15: 163-213.

Lenski, G. (1966): Power and Privilege: A Theory of Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mandel, R. (1980): “Roots of the modern interstate border dispute,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24: 427-454.

Marvel, S.A., Kleinberg, J., Kleinberg, R.D. & Strogatz, S.H. (2011): “Continuous-time model of structural balance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 5: 17711776.

McCulloh, I. & Carley, K.M. (2011): “Detecting change in longitudinal networks,” Journal of Social Structure 12:

Milo R., Shen-Orr S.S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., and Chklovskii D., Alon U. (2002): “Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks,” Science 2002, 298: 824-827.

Mitrany, D. (1933): The Progress of International Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mitrany, D. (1948): “Functional approach to world organization.” International Affairs 23. (1948).

Moore, M. (1978): “An international application of Heider’s balance theory,” European Journal of Social Psychology 8: 401-404.

Moore, M. (1979): “Structural balance and international relations,” European Journal of Social Psychology 9: 323-326.

Morovcek, A. (1997): “Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics,” International Organization 51: 513-553.

Neirop, T. (1989): “Macro-regions and the global institutional network, 1950-1980,” Political Geographical Quarterly 8, 1: 43-65.

Newman, M. E. J. (2006). “Modularity and community structure in networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 23: 8577-8696.

Nordlie, P. (1958): A Longitudinal Study of Interpersonal Attraction in a Natural Setting, Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

O’Leary, M. (1976): “The role of issues,” in Rosenau, J.N. (Ed.) In Search of Global Patterns. New York: Free Press, 318-325.

Pevehouse, J., Nordstrom, T. and Warnke, K. (2004): “The Correlates of War 2: International governmental organizations data, Version 2.0,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21: 101-109.

Scott, J. and Carrington, P.J. (Eds.) (2011): The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Sechser, T. S. (2011): Militarized compellent threats,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 28: 377-401.

Taylor, H. F. (1970): Balance in Small Groups. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 

Traag, V.A. and Bruggeman (2009): “Community detection in networks with positive and negative links,” arXiv: 0811.2329v3 [physics.soc=ph], 25 September 2009. 

Waltz, K. (1979): Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994): Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wimmer, A. and Min, B. (2006): From empire to nation-state: Explaining wars in the modern world,” American Sociological Review 71: 867-897.

Wolf, P. (1973): “International organization and attitude change: A re-examination of the functionalist approach.” International Organization 27: 347–371.