A Family of Affiliation Indices for Two-Mode Networks

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Social Structure

International Network for Social Network Analysis

Subject: Social Sciences

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 1529-1227

DESCRIPTION

16
Reader(s)
32
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 20 (2019)
Volume 19 (2018)
Volume 18 (2017)
Volume 17 (2016)
Volume 16 (2015)
Volume 15 (2014)
Volume 14 (2013)
Volume 13 (2012)
Volume 12 (2011)
Volume 11 (2010)
Volume 10 (2009)
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 (December 2013) > List of articles

A Family of Affiliation Indices for Two-Mode Networks

Frank Tutzauer

Keywords : Affiliation networks, network methodology, statistical methods, two-mode networks

Citation Information : Journal of Social Structure. Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 1-19, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-024

License : (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Published Online: 14-August-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

An affiliation network consists of actors and events. Actors are affiliated with each other by virtue of the events they mutually attend. This article introduces a family of affiliation measures that captures the extent of actors‘ affiliations in the network. At one extreme, one might have an actor who attended many events, but none of these events were attended by any of the other actors in the network. Although of high degree, in no reasonable interpretation would such an actor be considered highly affiliated with other actors in the network. At the other extreme, one might have an actor defined by a collection of events, all of which were attended by another actor(s), making the actor as enmeshed in the network as possible. Most actors will be between these extremes, with some events being shared by varying others, and some not. This article introduces a family of affiliation measures based on the entries of the co-occurrence matrix. After defining the measures, the cumulative distribution function of first-order affiliation is derived and expressed as a difference of binomials.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

Alderson, D. L. (2008). ―Catching the ―Network Science‖ Bug: Insight and Opportunity for the Operations Researcher.‖ Operations Research 56, 5: 1047-1065.

Aviv, R., Z. Erlich and G. Ravid (2008). ―Analysis of Transitivity and Reciprocity in Online Distance Learning Networks.‖ Connections 28, 1: 27-39.

Barnes, R. and T. Burkett (2010). ―Structural Redundancy and Multiplicity in Corporate Networks.‖ Connections 30, 2: 4-20.

Barnett, G. A. and J. A. Danowski (1992). ―The Structure of Communication: A Network Analysis of the International Communication Association.‖ Human Communication Research 19: 264-285.

Borgatti, S. P. and M. G. Everett (1997). ―Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data.‖ Social Networks 19: 243269.

Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett and L. C. Freeman (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Cho, H. and J-S. Lee (2008). ―Collaborative Information Seeking in Intercultural Computer-Mediated Communication Groups: Testing the Influence of Social Context Using Social Network Analysis.‖ Communication Research 35: 548-573.

Chung, C. J., S. Lee, G. A. Barnett and J. H. Kim (2009). ―A Comparative Network Analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the Era of Hybridization.‖ Asian Journal of Communication 19: 170-191.

Chung, C. J. and H. W. Park (2010). ―Textual Analysis of a Political Message: The Inaugural Addresses of Two Korean Presidents.‖ Social Science Information 49: 215-239.

Chung, F. and L. Lu (2001). ―The Diameter of Sparse Random Graphs.‖ Advances in Applied Mathematics 26: 257-279.

Crowe, J. A. (2007). ―In Search of a Happy Medium: How the Structure of Interorganizational Networks Influence Community Economic Development Strategies.‖ Social Networks 29: 469-488.

Davis, A., B. B. Gardner and M. R. Gardner (1941). Deep South: A Sociological Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Doerfel, M. L. and G. A. Barnett (1999). ―A Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association.‖ Human Communication Research 25: 589-603.

Erdös, P. and A. Rényi (1960). ―On the Evolution of Random Graphs.‖ Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5: 17-61.

Faust, K. (1997). ―Centrality in Affiliation Networks.‖ Social Networks 19: 157-191.

Faust, K. (2008). ―Triadic Configurations in Limited Choice Sociometric Networks: Empirical and Theoretical Results.‖ Social Networks 30: 273-282.

Ferrer i Cancho, R. and R. V. Solé (2001). ―The Small world of Human Language.‖ Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268: 2261-2265.

Field, S., K. A. Frank, K. Schiller, C. Riegle-Crumb and C. Muller (2006). ―Identifying Positions from Affiliation Networks: Preserving the Duality of People and Events.‖ Social Networks 28: 97-123.

Gilbert, E. N. (1959). ―Random Graphs.‖ Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30: 1141-1144.

Guenther, W. C. (1973). Concepts of Statistical Inference (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kang, S. M. (2007). ―Equicentrality and Network Centralization: A Micro-Macro Linkage.‖ Social Networks 29: 585-601.

Ko, K., K. J. Lee and C. Park (2008). ―Rethinking Preferential Attachment Scheme: Degree Centrality versus Closeness Centrality.‖ Connections 28, 1: 4-15.

Koenig, T., R. Gogel and J. Sonquist (1979). ―Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates.‖ American Journal of Economics and Sociology 38: 173-186.

Latapy, M., C. Magnien and N. Del Vecchio (2008). ―Basic Notions for the Analysis of Large Two-Mode Networks.‖ Social Networks 30: 31-48.

Lee, S. (2008). ―Understanding the Nature of Citation: Examination of Structure in Citation Analysis and its Application to Communication Discipline in the Information Age.‖ Doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Amherst, NY.

Mizruchi, M. S. and E. J. Neuman (2008). ―The Effect of Density on the Level of Bias in the Network Autocorrelation Model.‖ Social Networks 30: 190-200.

Moody, J. (2004). ―The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999.‖ American Sociological Review 69: 213-238.

Park, H. W. and M. Thelwall (2008). ―Developing Network Indicators for Ideological Landscapes from the Political Blogosphere in South Korea.‖ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 856879.

Wang, P., K. Sharpe, G. L. Robins and P. E. Pattison (2009). ―Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Affiliation Networks.‖ Social Networks 31: 12-25.

Wonnacott, T. H. and R. J. Wonnacott (1990). Introductory Statistics (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.

Zhou, D., and E. Heineken (2009). ―The Use of Metaphors in Academic Communication: Traps or Treasures.‖ Ibérica 18: 23-42.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS