SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Journal of Ultrasonography. Volume 15, Issue 61, Pages 164-171, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2015.0014
License : (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Received Date : 12-February-2015 / Accepted: 10-March-2015 / Published Online: 13-September-2016
Recent years have witnessed a dynamic development of mammary gland imaging techniques,particularly ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. A challengerelated to these studies is the increase in the precision of the anatomical assessment of breast, particularly for early detection of subclinical lesions, performance of ultrasound-guided biopsy procedures, and accurate preoperative location of pathological lesions so as to optimize the surgical treatment. Ultrasound imaging is a primary and baseline diagnostic procedure the patient with suspected pathological lesions withinbreast is referred to by the surgeon. Lesions visualized in ultrasound scans are classified according to the BI-RADS US assessment categories. The successive categories (2 through 6) encompass individual pathological lesions, estimating the risk of malignancy and provide guidelines for further diagnostic and therapeutic management. This article described the important aspects of ultrasonographic imaging of focal lesions within the breasts as signifi cant from the standpoint of surgical treatment of patients falling within BI-RADS US categories 3, 4, 5, and 6. Attention is drawn to the importance of ultrasound scans in the assessment of axillary fossa lymph nodes before the decision regarding the surgical treatment.
1. Halsted WS: A clinical and histological study of certain adenocarcinomata of the breast, and a brief consideration of the supraclavicular operation and of the results of operations for cancer of the breast from 1889 to 1898 at the Johns Hopkins hospital. Ann Surg 1898;28: 557–576.
2. Sharma B, Martin A, Stanway S, Johnston SR, Constantinidou A: Imaging in oncology – over a century of advances. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9: 728–737.
3. Jakubowski W, Dobruch-Sobczak K, Migda B: Standardy badań ultrasonograficznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Ultrasonograficznego– aktualizacja. Badani bn sonomammografi czne. J Ultrason 2012; 12:245–261.
4. Stavros AT: Lite guzki łagodne: Charakterystyczne rozpoznania patologiczne.In: Stavros AT: Ultrasonografi a piersi. Medipage, Warszawa2007: 528–596.
5. Wu JT, Chen ST, Chen CJ, Kuo YL, Tseng LM, Chen DP et al.: Breast cancer arising within fi broadenoma: collective analysis of case reports in the literature and hints on treatment policy. World J Surg Oncol 2014; 12: 335.
6. Jassem J, Krzakowski M, Bobek-Bilewicz B, Duchnowska R, Jeziorski A, Olszewski W et al.: Rak piersi. In: Krzakowski M, Warzocha K. Zalecenia postępowania diagnostyczno-terapeutycznego w nowotworach złośliwych. Via Medica, Gdańsk 2013: 213–257.
7. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. American Society of Clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Obcol 2014; 32: 1365–1383.
8. Choi YJ, Ko EY, Han BK, Shin JH, Kang SS, Hahn SY: High-resolutionultrasonographic features of axillaty lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. The Breast 2009; 18: 119–122.