The Composition of Fungal Communities in the Rumen of Gayals (Bos frontalis), Yaks (Bos grunniens), and Yunnan and Tibetan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurs)

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Polish Journal of Microbiology

Polish Society of Microbiologists

Subject: Microbiology

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1733-1331
eISSN: 2544-4646

DESCRIPTION

0
Reader(s)
0
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 68 , ISSUE 4 (Dec 2019) > List of articles

The Composition of Fungal Communities in the Rumen of Gayals (Bos frontalis), Yaks (Bos grunniens), and Yunnan and Tibetan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurs)

HOUFU WANG / PENGFEI LI / XUCHUAN LIU / CHUNYONG ZHANG / QIONGFEN LU / DONGMEI XI / RENHUI YANG / SHULING WANG / WENSHUN BAI / ZHEN YANG / RONGKANG ZHOU / XIAO CHENG / JING LENG *

Keywords : gayals, yaks, Yunnan yellow cattle, Tibetan yellow cattle, rumen fungi, ITS-sequencing

Citation Information : Polish Journal of Microbiology. Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 505-514, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2019-050

License : (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 05-December-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

The rumen is a microbial-rich ecosystem in which rumen fungi play an important role in the feed digestion of ruminants. The composition of rumen fungi in free-range ruminants such as gayals, yaks, Tibetan yellow cattle, and the domesticated Yunnan yellow cattle was investigated by sequencing an internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) using Illumina MiSeq. A total of 285 092 optimized sequences and 904 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained from the four cattle breeds. The rumen fungi abundance and Chao and Simpson indexes were all higher in free-range ruminants than in domesticated ruminants. Three fungal phyla were identified by sequence comparison: Neocallimastigomycota, Basidiomycota, and Ascomycota. Basidiomycota and Ascomycota have very low abundance in the rumen of four breeds cattle but anaerobic fungi (AF) Neocallimastigomycota occurred in a high abundance. In Neocallimastigomycota, the dominant genera were Piromyces, Anaeromyces, Cyllamyces, Neocallimastix, and Orpionmyces in four cattle breeds. The composition of the major genera of Neocallimastigaceae varied greatly among the four cattle breeds. The unclassified genera were unequally distributed in gayals, yaks, Tibetan and Yunnan yellow cattle, accounting for 90.63%, 98.52%, 97.79%, and 27.01% respectively. It appears that free-range ruminants have more unknown rumen fungi than domesticated ruminants and the cattle breeds and animal diets had an impact on the diversity of rumen fungi.

Graphical ABSTRACT

Introduction

Ruminant animals lack the carbohydrate-active enzyme encoding genes, so feed (carbohydrate) metabolism is completely dependent on the microorganisms residing in their rumen (Kameshwar and Qin 2018). Current research on rumen fungi has focused on anaerobic rumen fungi. Anaerobic rumen fungi play a very important role in the digestion and metabolism of carbohydrates in the rumen (Gruninger et al. 2018; Kameshwar and Qin 2018). Anaerobic rumen fungi can secrete large amounts of cellulolytic enzymes. Their hyphae can destroy the cell wall structure of plant feed owing to the combination of enzymes and degradable cellulose and this improves the degradation and utilization rates of plant feed (Lee et al. 2000; Gruninger et al. 2018; Kameshwar et al. 2018). Currently, the rumen AF (anaerobic fungi) are classified into phylum Neocallimastigomycota (Gruninger et al. 2014) and Neocallimasticaceae (Hibbett et al. 2007). Neocallimasticaceae was divided into eleven genera, containing a large number of monocentric rumen AF: Neocallimastix, Piromyces, Caecomyces, Oontomyces (Dagar et al. 2015a), Pecoramyces (Hanafy et al. 2017), Feramyces, Liebetanzomyces (Hanafy et al. 2018), and Buwchfawromyces (Griffith et al. 2015), as well as three polycentric genera: Orpinomyces, Anaeromyces (Breton et al. 1990), and Cyllamyces (Emin et al. 2001). The studies have shown that these AF are important in the rumen microbial system (Orpin 1975; Ho and Barr 1995). However, recent studies have shown that Basidiomycota and Ascomycota phyla play an important role in the rumen digestion of Holstein cows and cashmere goats (Zhang et al. 2017; Han et al. 2019).

Little is known about rumen AF and most of them were identified by microscopic conventional cultivation techniques, which provides important information for rumen AF (Breton et al. 1990; Ho and Barr 1995). The limitations of these methods are mainly due to the strict growing requirements and the low survival rate but molecular biology techniques can overcome these problems (Pryce et al. 2006). The fungal ribosomal RNA gene includes a gene encoding 28S ribosomal DNA, 18S ribosomal DNA, and 5.8S ribosomal DNA, which in the internal transcribed spacer Region1 evolves rapidly (Sirohi et al. 2013; Elekwachi et al. 2017). The last-mentioned gene has the interspecies specificity and intraspecies conservation, and the length of the sequence is moderate enough to get sufficient information (Pryce et al. 2006; Campa et al. 2008; Bellemain et al. 2010). ITS sequencing is used to study the diversity of the community of rumen AF and provide genetic information for the classification and identification of fungi (Liggenstoffer et al. 2010; Koljalg et al. 2013).

The free-range gayals are mainly distributed in the Nujiang River and Dulong River areas of Yunnan Province, China. Yaks live exclusively on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China (An et al. 2005) and are well adapted to harsh environmental conditions. Yunnan yellow cattle and Tibetan yellow cattle are common, wide-ranging cattle. Yunnan yellow cattle live in the same region as gayals and Tibetan yellow cattle in the same region as yaks (Deng et al. 2007; Leng et al. 2012). Rumen bacteria in gayals, Yunnan yellow cattle and yak have been already studied (Deng et al. 2007), but there is no research on their rumen fungi. Rumen anaerobic fungi are the first microorganisms attached to fibers during rumen microbial degradation (Bauchop 1979) and play an important role in the degradation process (Dagar et al. 2015b). Anaerobic fungi degrade lignocellulose using a large portfolio of Carbohydrate-Active enZymes (CAZymes) and penetrating hyphae that physically disrupt the ultrastructure of the plant cell wall; such action may help to increase the surface area for bacterial colonization and further enzymatic digestion (Lee et al. 2000; Gruninger et al. 2018; Kameshwar et al. 2018). Rumen anaerobic fungi have great application potential in industrial production. The AF cellulose degradation ability shows that it can increase biogas production in co-culture with methanogens (Cheng 2018). Studies have also shown that rumen AF can reduce animal energy loss by reducing CH4 (greenhouse gas) production during digestion, and it can also be used to improve the straw lignocellulosic structure in biofuels and biochemical production (Andrea et al. 2018; Oliver and Schilling 2018). These four cattle breeds are very important cattle species in China, and there are very few studies on their rumen fungi. Therefore, this paper conducted a comprehensive analysis of rumen fungi from four breeds of cattle to help us understand their rumen fungi function.

Experimental

Materials and methods

Animals and sampling. Sixteen male samples (3 ± 0.25 years old) were used in this study, including four cattle breeds and each breed comprised four cattle. Gayals and Yunnan yellow cattle were from the Nujiang Region, Yunnan Province, China (27° 46′ 55.15″ N, 98° 39′ 49.99″ E above sea level 2260 m). Yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle were from the Diqing Region, Yunnan Province, China (27° 51′ 30.61″ N, 99° 41′ 42.82″ E, above sea level 3280 m). Gayals, yaks, and Tibetan yellow cattle lived outside, ate mainly wild grass, without any supervision. Yunnan yellow cattle lived in cattle lairs and were fed rice bran and corn (Table II). Rumen contents were collected by gastric tube, filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and stored at –80°C before DNA extraction.

Table I

Diversity index of anaerobic fungal communities among the cattle breeds.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-tbl1.jpg
Table II

Cattle diet and nutrient levels.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-tbl2.jpg

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing. DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of rumen contents per sample after thawing and mixing well, with the E.Z.N.A DNA kits for soil, following the manufacturer’s introduction. PCR was conducted using universal fungal primers for ITS1, which are as follows: forward primer ITS1 5’-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3’ and reverse primer ITS2 5’-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3’ (Man et al. 2018). Each tube for amplification contained 4 µl 5 × FastPfu Buffer, 2 µl dNTPs at a concentration of 2.5 mM, 0.8 µl each primer at a concentration of 5 uM, 0.4 µl FastPu polymerase, and 10 ng DNA template with double-distilled H2O (ddH2O) added to 20 µl. PCR was performed at 95°C for 2 min, and 33 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s followed by incubation at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified using AxyPrep DNA gel extraction kits and eluted with Tris-HCl buffer. PCR products were quantified using the PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit and QuantiFluor-ST Blue Fluorescence System (Promega).

Phylogenetic analysis. Amplicons of ITS-1 sequences, which were moderately conserved regions of the 18S rRNA gene, were used for the sequence-specific separation. ITS-1 sequencing was regarded as an effective method for recognizing the diversity and structure of rumen fungi. The PE reads obtained by Miseq sequencing are first spliced according to the overlapping relationship, and the quality and quality of the sequence were quality-controlled and filtered. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) cluster analysis and species taxonomic analysis were performed after the samples were distinguished. The various diversity index analysis could be performed based on OTUs. Cluster analysis results could be used to analyze the diversity index of OTUs and the establishment of the sequencing depth. Based on the taxonomic information, the statistical analysis of community structure could be performed at each classification level. Based on 97% similarity of OTUs the suscessful identification of species from Piromyces and Neocallimastix in the goat and buffalo rumen was performed (Brookman et al. 2000). The 97% similarity level to partition OTUs was used in this work. Basic diversity estimates and rarefaction curves were computed as OTU0.05 outputs using Mothur (Schloss et al. 2011), including analyses of diversity indexes ACE, Chao, Shannon and Simpson. In addition to the diversity curves, rarefaction and rank-abundance curves were also generated to describe the sequencing depth using Mothur. The Unite database (Koljalg et al. 2013) was used to determine taxonomic information on OTUs. Based on taxonomic information such as abundance and the genera of all OTUs, phylogenetic trees were built that included abundance and structure of rumen fungi using MEGAN and NCBI databases. Venn and Heatmap diagrams were built using the R language (Jami et al. 2013).

Results

A total of 622 176 original sequences were obtained from four cattle breeds by Illumina sequencing of which 297 745 sequences remained after quality control measures, and 285 092 sequences were used for phylogenetic analyses. The average length of trim sequences used for analyses was 317.6 bp. The average number of sequences from the different cattle breeds is shown in Table I. Rarefaction curve analysis (Fig. 1B) indicated that sequences collected in this study comprised the majority of rumen fungi sequences from the four cattle breeds. The taxonomic analysis was reflected in the cluster analysis of OTUs, with 904 OTUs from the four cattle breeds: 255 OTUs from gayals, 166 from Yunnan yellow cattle, 463 from yaks, and 441 from Tibetan yellow cattle (Table I). The four cattle breeds had unique OTUs of rumen AF and shared OTUs across rumen AF (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Venn diagram, rarefaction index, and abundance distribution curves for D, H, M and ZH based on OTUs from cattle breeds, which had ≥ 97% similarity.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle. Red line represents D. Blue line represents ZH.

Green line represents M. Yellow line represents H.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-f001.jpg

Diversity analysis. ACE, Chao, Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes were calculated to determine the diversity of rumen fungi in the cattle breeds. In this study, the largest ACE and Chao indexes were for yaks, followed by Tibetan yellow cattle, gayals, and Yunnan yellow cattle, which indicated that yaks had a larger number of rumen fungi than the other three species. Although the abundance of rumen fungi in gayals and Yunnan yellow cattle was lower than in yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle, their diversity was close to yaks and higher than Tibetan yellow cattle as demonstrated by the Shannon and Simpson indexes (Table I).

With increasing sequencing depth, the number of OTUs was unchanged (Fig. 1B). A rank-abundance distribution curve was constructed to reflect the abundance and uniformity of rumen fungi. The width of the curve indicated the highest abundance of rumen fungi for yaks and the least abundance for Yunnan yellow cattle; the abundance of Tibetan yellow cattle was close to yaks (Fig. 1C). According to the sequence abundance of the top 50 OTUs, the relative abundance of rumen fungi was similar. However, abundance differed among the different cattle breeds with increasing OTU ranking (Fig. 1C). The uniformity of rumen fungi was similar when the relative abundance was under 0.01, indicating that yaks, Tibetan yellow cattle, and gayals had a similar abundance and uniformity of fungi (Fig. 1C).

Phylogenetic analysis. A phylogenetic tree based on OTUs was constructed (Fig. 3). Rumen fungi from the ITS-1 phylogenetic tree were mainly divided into three subdivisions. Three fungal phyla were identified by sequence comparison: Neocallimastigomycota, Basidiomycota, and Ascomycota (Table III), the remaining sequences were unclassified. We detected 62 dominant genera from Ascomycota, but the abundance was very low of each genus. The most abundant genus was Cladosporium, accounting for 306 sequences, mainly distributed in yaks. Udeniomyces was the most abundant among 29 genera from Basidiomycota, accounting for 2021 sequences, and was mainly distributed in Yunnan yellow cattle (Fig. 3). Further analysis showed larges differences in the composition of the primary genera of Neocallimastigaceae between different cattle breeds. The dominant genera were Piromyces, Anaeromyces, Cyllamyces, Neocallimastix, and Orpionmyces. In gayals, Piromyces, Cyllamyces, and Anaeromyces were the classified dominant rumen AF, accounting for 4.35%, 3.18%, and 1% of total sequences. Cyllamyces and Orpionmyces dominated in Yunnan yellow cattle, accounting for 51.12%, and 16.23% respectively. Piromyces, Anaeromyces, Cyllamyces, and Orpionmyces accounted for less than 1% of the total sequences in yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle. Neocallimastix was detected only in yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle and accounted for less than 0.01% of the total sequences. The most dominant genus was Cyllamyces, accounting for 32 146 sequences and 50.64% of the total Neocallimastigaceae sequences (Fig. 2). Cyllamyces accounted for 51.12% of the total sequences in Yunnan yellow cattle, was the second-most abundant (3.18%) in gayals, and the least abundant (0.26%) in yaks. Piromyces accounted for 4.35% of the total sequences in gayals, was the second-most abundant (0.44%) in Yunnan yellow cattle, and the least abundant (0.01%) in yaks. Orpionmyces accounted for 16.23% of the total sequences in Yunnan yellow cattle, was the second-most abundant (0.62%) in gayals, and the least abundant (0.02%) in Tibetan yellow cattle. Anaeromyces accounted for less than 1% of all species. Udeniomyces from Basidiomycota were detected only in Yunnan yellow cattle and comprised 3.51% of total sequences.

Fig. 2.

Composition of rumen fungi genera. Others represent the abundance of rumen fungi lower than 1%.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-f002.jpg
Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic tree. The tree was based on taxonomic information such as the abundance of all genera and the genera of corresponding OTUs based on taxonomic information from the NCBI database to reflect the diversity and community of rumen fungi of D, H, M, and ZH.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-f003.jpg
Table III

Fungal classification and the percentage statistics.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-tbl3.jpg

The hierarchical clustering heatmap analysis was performed at the class level based on the top 95 most abundant communities across the four cattle breeds (Fig. 4). Results were separated into five clusters. The abundance of Anaeromyces, Orpinomyces, Piromyces, and Cyllamyces was higher than for the other genera in the first cluster. In the second cluster, five fungal genera were more abundant in Yunnan yellow cattle compared to gayals, yaks, and Tibetan yellow cattle. In the third cluster, the unidentified class was the most abundant in gayals and yaks, with eight genera from Tibetan yellow cattle, which were more abundant than in gayals, yaks, and Yunnan yellow cattle. In yaks, 21 genera of fungi were more abundant than in gayals, Yunnan yellow cattle, and Tibetan yellow cattle in the fourth cluster. The 11 genera were the most dominant in gayals when compared to yaks, Tibetan yellow cattle, and Yunnan yellow cattle in the fifth cluster.

Fig. 4.

Heatmap formed using the Bray-Curtis algorithm and the complete linkage method. The heatmap-plot describes the relative percentage of each fungal class within each cattle breed. Relative values for the fungal class are indicated by color intensity.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

10.33073_pjm-2019-050-f004.jpg

Discussion

The previous studies have shown that Illumina sequencing has a higher capacity to explore rumen bacteria diversity than culture-dependent methods (Peng et al. 2015). PCR amplification of universal primers for conserved regions within the rRNA genes, followed by DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) is widely used in fungal identification studies (Pryce et al. 2006). Primers using ITS1 can avoid bias in PCR amplification and reliably study the fungal abundance and species richness (Bellemain et al. 2010). This study used the second-generation sequencing technology to investigate the structure and diversity of rumen fungi communities in four cattle breeds. The results provide new information about rumen fungi communities. The analysis showed that the dominant rumen fungi clusters, distribution, and abundance present major differences among the cattle breeds, location, and feeds.

Free-range ruminants that use grass as food may require more anaerobic fungal cellulase to aid digestion than domesticated ruminants. When compared with Yunnan yellow cattle, gayals, yak, and Tibetan yellow cattle have abundant rumen fungi sequences (Table I) and more unique OTUs (Fig. 1A). Analysis of ACE, Chao, and Simpson indexes showed that gayals, yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle had higher indexes than Yunnan yellow cattle, but the Shannon index was smaller than for Yunnan yellow cattle (Table I). These results suggest that free-range gayals and Tibetan cattle can have higher rumen fungi diversity than domesticated Yunnan cattle. Unclassified sequences were 90.63% for gayals, 98.52% for yaks, 97.79% for Tibetan yellow cattle, and 27.01% for Yunnan yellow cattle (Fig. 2), which was consistent with the heatmap analysis (Fig. 4). These results showed that the class levels could be divided into five clusters based on the top 95 genera. Many unidentified genera were distributed in the third cluster and were dominant in gayals, yaks, and Tibetan yellow cattle. These results indicated that free-range ruminants were more likely to have unknown yet fungi.

Animal species and location may be the important factors influencing the distribution and abundance of dominant rumen fungi clusters. Analysis of phylogenetic trees detected three dominant phyla rumen fungi: Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Neocallimastigomycota in the four cattle breeds in this study (Fig. 3), similar to the results of Zhang and Han studies (Zhang et al. 2017; Han et al. 2019). But the abundance of Neocallimastigomycota is superior to Ascomycota and Basidiomycota in this study, contrary to the results of the study on the cashmere goats (Han et al. 2019). However, Neocallimastigomycota predominates in the rumen, which is similar to the results on most ruminant rumen anaerobic fungi (Youssef et al. 2013; Wei et al. 2016; Rabee et al. 2018). A previous study showed that the genera of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota efficiently produce beta-glucanase (Mintz-Cole et al. 2013), possibly promoting the digestibility of feed, even though their abundance is low.

Different cattle breeds have different dominant rumen fungi clusters (Fig. 4) and the abundance of rumen fungi (Table I). Anaeromyces and Piromyces, Orpinomyces, and Cyllamyces were most abundant in gayals and Yunnan yellow cattle in the first cluster. Five genera of rumen fungi in Yunnan yellow cattle were more numerous than was shown for gayals, yaks, and Tibetan yellow cattle. The eight genera of rumen fungi in Tibetan yellow cattle were more numerous than in gayals, yaks, and Yunnan yellow cattle. The 21 genera of rumen AF in yaks were more numerous than in gayals, Yunnan yellow cattle, and Tibetan yellow cattle. Finally, the 11 genera of rumen fungi in gayals were more numerous than in Yunnan yellow cattle, Tibetan yellow cattle, and yaks in the clus ters 2–5. Piromyces, Cyllamyces, and Anaeromyces were the most often classified abundant rumen AF in gayals (Fig. 2 and 3). These three representative genera were more prevalent in 19 ruminant and nonruminant animals (Liggenstoffer et al. 2010). However, in the other three cattle breeds, Piromyces accounted for less than 0.44% of the total sequences. Cyllamyces was the most abundant rumen AF genus in a previous report, accounting for 67% of total sequences in domesticated ruminants (Fliegerova et al. 2010). In our study, Cyllamyces was mainly found in Yunnan yellow cattle, accounting for 51.12% of the total sequences, and were more numerous than in gayals (3.18%), Tibetan yellow cattle (0.62%), and yaks (0.26%) (Fig. 2). Cyllamyces was also detected in American bison by Liggenstoffer et al. (2010) but the abundance was less than 0.7% of the total sequences, suggesting that Cyllamyces is more likely to be present in domesticated ruminants than other genera, which is consistent with Ozkose et al. (2001). We found two Anaeromyces species, A. elegans and, A. mucronatus (Breton et al. 1990) that have high cellulolytic, xylanolytic, and glycoside hydrolase activities in different ruminant hosts. The β-xylosidase activities of A. mucronatus are higher in buffalo and endo-1,4-β-D-glucanohydrolase has the highest activity in alpaca (Fliegerova et al. 2002) and they are more effective at degrading the stem fragments of ryegrass than Caecomyces (Joblin et al. 2002). Anaeromyces occurred the least often in Tibetan yellow cattle, accounting for 0.01% of all sequences (Fig. 2). These findings were consistent with a previous study on the relationship of the abundance of Piromyces and Anaeromyces in crude feed and the host (Liggenstoffer et al. 2010). Neocallimastix accounted for less than 0.01% of the total sequences (Fig. 3) and was found only in yaks and Tibetan yellow cattle, which were selected from the Diqing Region. However, Kittelmann and coworkers have found that Neocallimastix is dominant in New Zealand cattle, accounting for 26.4% of all sequences (Kittelmann et al. 2012). This result indicates that the abundance of Neocallimastix may be related to cattle breeds or habitat.

Diet can also be an important factor. Han and coworkers research has shown that the concentrated feed has an important impact on the anaerobic fungal population of cashmere goats AF (Han et al. 2019). AF secrete a range of cell wall degrading enzymes such as free enzymes and cellulase multienzyme complexes (Cheng et al. 2018), which are effective degradation products of plant biomass (Haitjema et al. 2014). Screening of all rumen microbial CAZyme transcripts indicated that the AF of Neocallimastigaceae produced the largest share of cellulase transcripts (Söllinger et al. 2018). The studies have shown that Orpinomyces R001 and Neocallimastix M010 AF exhibit high digestion efficiency in the cell walls of straw silage and can cause the disappearance of in situ dry matter (Lee et al. 2015). The co-culture of Neocallimastix frontalis and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium showed high polysaccharide hydrolase (xylanase and FPase) and esterase activity (Wei et al. 2016). Piromyces sp. UH3-1 recognizes the secretion of lignin-regulating enzymes by the fungal pathway and is capable of producing a more efficient enzyme mixture (Hooker et al. 2018). Denman and coworkers have found that Orpinomyces had higher abundance with grain feed compared to fiber diets (Denman et al. 2008). However, another study found that the activity of cellulases and xylanases of Orpinomyces are related to the presence of Neocallimastix genus (Li et al. 1997). The biofortification of Orpinomyces sp. can significantly increase methane production (Akyol et al. 2019). In our study, Orpinomyces accounted for 16.23% of the total sequences in Yunnan yellow cattle and were more numerous than in gayals (0.62%), yaks (0.23%), and Tibetan yellow cattle (0.02%) (Fig. 2). This study suggested that Orpinmyces tended to be found in domesticated ruminants with easily digested diets.

This study found a large difference in rumen fungi abundance among four cattle breeds. Rumen fungi diversity and composition were mainly related to diet, and the use of its components depends on enzyme activity and quantity produced by these fungi. To better understand the relationship between fungal composition and function and the ruminant growth, as well as to extract cellulases from rumen fungi, the metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses should be used in future studies.

Ethical approval

All animal care procedures were approved and authorized by the animal ethics committee of Yunnan Agricultural University.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No: 31672452), the Key Research and Development Plan Project of Yunnan province (Project No: 2018BB001-2), and the Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal and Feed Science (Project No: DYCX2015001) are acknowledged with gratitude.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not report any financial or personal connections with other persons or organizations, which might negatively affect the contents of this publication and/or claim authorship rights to this publication.

References


  1. Akyol, Ince O, Bozan M, Ozbayram EG, Ince B. Fungal bio augmentation of anaerobic digesters fed with lignocellulosic bio mass: what to expect from anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces sp. Bioresour Technol. 2019 Apr;277:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.024
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  2. An D, Dong X, Dong Z. Prokaryote diversity in the rumen of yak (Bos grunniens) and Jinnan cattle (Bos taurus) estimated by 16S rDNA homology analyses. Anaerobe. 2005 Aug;11(4):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.02.001
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  3. Bauchop T. The rumen anaerobic fungi: colonizers of plant fibre. Ann Rech Vet. 1979;10(2-3):246–248.
  4. Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10(1):189–197. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-189
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  5. Breton A, Bernalier A, Dusser M, Fonty GÃ, Gaillard-Martinie B, Guillot J. Anaeromyces mucronatus nov. gen., nov. sp. A new strictly anaerobic rumen fungus with polycentric thallus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990 Jul;70(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13974.x
  6. Brookman JL, Theodorou MK, Trinci APJ, Mennim G, Tuckwell DS. Identification and characterization of anaerobic gut fungi using molecular methodologies based on ribosomal ITS1 and 18S rRNA. Microbiology. 2000 Feb 01;146(2):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  7. Campa D, Tavanti A, Gemignani F, Mogavero CS, Bellini I, Bottari F, Barale R, Landi S, Senesi S. DNA microarray based on arrayed-primer extension technique for identification of pathogenic fungi responsible for invasive and superficial mycoses. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Mar 01;46(3):909–915. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01406-07
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  8. Cheng Y, Shi Q, Sun R, Liang D, Li Y, Li Y, Jin W, Zhu W. The biotechnological potential of anaerobic fungi on fiber degradation and methane production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Oct; 34(10):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2539-z
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  9. Dagar SS, Kumar S, Griffith GW, Edwards JE, Callaghan TM, Singh R, Nagpal AK, Puniya AK. A new anaerobic fungus (Oon tomyces anksri gen. nov., sp. nov.) from the digestive tract of the Indian camel (Camelus dromedarius). Fungal Biol. 2015a Aug;119(8):731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.04.005
    [CROSSREF]
  10. Dagar SS, Singh N, Goel N, Kumar S, Puniya AK. Role of anaerobic fungi in wheat straw degradation and effects of plant feed additives on rumen fermentation parameters in vitro. Benef Microbes. 2015b Jan;6(3):353–360. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2014.0071
    [CROSSREF]
  11. Deng W, Wang L, Ma S, Jin B, He T, Yang Z, Mao H, Wanapat M. Comparison of Gayal (Bos frontalis) and Yunnan yellow cattle (Bos taurus): rumen function, digestibilities and nitrogen balance during feeding of pelleted lucerne (Medicago sativum). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun 1;20(6):900–907. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.900
    [CROSSREF]
  12. Denman SE, Nicholson MJ, Brookman JL, Theodorou MK, McSweeney CS. Detection and monitoring of anaerobic rumen fungi using an ARISA method. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008 Dec;47(6):492–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02449.x
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  13. Elekwachi CO, Wang Z, Wu X, Rabee A, Forster RJ. Total rRNA-Seq analysis gives insight into bacterial, fungal, protozoal and archaeal communities in the rumen using an optimized RNA isolation method. Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 21;8:1814–1827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01814
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  14. Fliegerov K, Mrázek J, Hoffmann K, Zábransk J, Voigt K. Diversity of anaerobic fungi within cow manure determined by ITS1 analysis. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jul;55(4):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0049-y
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  15. Fliegerov K, Pažoutov S, Mrázek J, Kopečn J. Special properties of polycentric anaerobic fungus Anaeromyces mucronatus. Acta Vet Brno. 2002;71(4):441–444. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271040441
    [CROSSREF]
  16. Griffith GW, Callaghan TM, Podmirseg SM, Hohlweck D, Edwards JE, Puniya AK, Dagar SS. Buwchfawromyces eastonii gen. nov., sp. nov.: a new anaerobic fungus (Neocallimastigomycota) isolated from buffalo faeces. MycoKeys. 2015 Mar 04;9:11–28. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.9.9032
    [CROSSREF]
  17. Gruninger RJ, Nguyen TTM, Reid ID, Yanke JL, Wang P, Abbott DW, Tsang A, McAllister T. Application of transcriptomics to compare the carbohydrate active enzymes that are expressed by diverse genera of anaerobic fungi to degrade plant cell wall carbohydrates. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1581–1595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01581
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  18. Gruninger RJ, Puniya AK, Callaghan TM, Edwards JE, Youssef N, Dagar SS, Fliegerova K, Griffith GW, Forster R, Tsang A, et al. Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota): advances in under standing their taxonomy, life cycle, ecology, role and bio techno logical potential. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Oct;90(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12383
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  19. Haitjema CH, Solomon KV, Henske JK, Theodorou MK, O’Malley MA. Anaerobic gut fungi: advances in isolation, culture, and cellulolytic enzyme discovery for biofuel production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014 Aug;111(8):1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25264
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  20. Han X, Li B, Wang X, Chen Y, Yang Y. Effect of dietary concentrate to forage ratios on ruminal bacterial and anaerobic fungal populations of cashmere goats. Anaerobe. 2019 Oct;59(59):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.010
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  21. Hanafy RA, Elshahed MS, Liggenstoffer AS, Griffith GW, Youssef NH. Pecoramyces ruminantium, gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic gut fungus from the feces of cattle and sheep. Mycologia. 2017 Mar 04;109(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2017.1317190
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  22. Hanafy RA, Elshahed MS, Youssef NH. Feramyces austinii, gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic gut fungus from rumen and fecal samples of wild Barbary sheep and fallow deer. Mycologia. 2018 May 04; 110(3):513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1466610
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  23. Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lücking R, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol Res. 2007 May;111(5):509–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  24. Ho YW, Barr DJS. Classification of anaerobic gut fungi from herbivores with emphasis on rumen fungi from Malaysia. Mycologia. 1995 Sep;87(5):655–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1995.12026582
    [CROSSREF]
  25. Hooker CA, Hillman ET, Overton JC, Ortiz-Velez A, Schacht M, Hunnicutt A, Mosier NS, Solomon KV. Hydrolysis of untreated lignocellulosic feedstock is independent of S-lignin composition in newly classified anaerobic fungal isolate, Piromyces sp. UH3-1. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 Dec;11(1):293–306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1292-8
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  26. Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 2013 Jun; 7(6):1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.2
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  27. Joblin KN, Matsui H, Naylor GE, Ushida K. Degradation of fresh ryegrass by methanogenic co-cultures of ruminal fungi grown in the presence or absence of Fibrobacter succinogenes. Curr Microbiol. 2002 Jul 1;45(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-001-0078-5
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  28. Kameshwar AKS, Qin W. Genome wide analysis reveals the extrinsic cellulolytic and biohydrogen generating abilities of Neocallimastigomycota fungi. J Genomics. 2018;6:74–87. https://doi.org/10.7150/jgen.25648
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  29. Kittelmann S, Naylor GE, Koolaard JP, Janssen PH. A proposed taxonomy of anaerobic fungi (class Neocallimastigomycetes) suitable for large-scale sequence-based community structure analysis. PLoS One. 2012 May 16;7(5):e36866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036866
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  30. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Taylor AFS, Bahram M, Bates ST, Bruns TD, Bengtsson-Palme J, Callaghan TM, et al. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271–5277. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  31. Lee SM, Guan LL, Eun JS, Kim CH, Lee SJ, Kim ET, Lee SS. The effect of anaerobic fungal inoculation on the fermentation characteristics of rice straw silages. J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Mar; 118(3):565–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12724
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  32. Lee SS, Ha JK, Cheng KJ. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Sep 01;66(9):3807–3813. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.3807-3813.2000
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  33. Leng J, Cheng YM, Zhang CY, Zhu RJ, Yang SL, Gou X, Deng WD, Mao HM. Molecular diversity of bacteria in Yunnan yellow cattle (Bos taurs) from Nujiang region, China. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Feb;39(2):1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0848-5
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  34. Li XL, Chen H, Ljungdahl LG. Monocentric and polycentric anaerobic fungi produce structurally related cellulases and xyla nases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Feb;63(2):628–635.
    [PUBMED]
  35. Liggenstoffer AS, Youssef NH, Couger MB, Elshahed MS. Phylogenetic diversity and community structure of anaerobic gut fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota) in ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. ISME J. 2010 Oct;4(10):1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.49
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  36. Man B, Wang H, Yun Y, Xiang X, Wang R, Duan Y, Cheng X. Diversity of fungal communities in Heshang Cave of Central China revealed by Mycobiome-Sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jul 16; 9:1400–1414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01400
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  37. Mintz-Cole RA, Brandt EB, Bass SA, Gibson AM, Reponen T, Khurana Hershey GK. Surface availability of beta-glucans is criti cal determinant of host immune response to Cladosporium clado sporioides. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jul;132(1):159–169.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.003
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  38. Oliver JP, Schilling JS. Harnessing fungi to mitigate CH4 in natural and engineered systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Sep; 102(17):7365–7375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9203-2
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  39. Orpin CG. Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol. 1975 Dec 01;91(2):249–262. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-91-2-249
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  40. Ozkose E, Thomas BJ, Davies DR, Griffith GW, Theodorou MK. Cyllamyces aberensis gen.nov. sp.nov., a new anaerobic gut fungus with branched sporangiophores isolated from cattle. Can J Bot. 2001;79(6):666–673. https://doi.org/10.1139/b01-047
  41. Peng S, Yin J, Liu X, Jia B, Chang Z, Lu H, Jiang N, Chen Q. First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing. J Appl Genet. 2015 Aug;56(3):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-014-0258-1
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  42. Pryce TM, Palladino S, Price DM, Gardam DJ, Campbell PB, Christiansen KJ, Murray RJ. Rapid identification of fungal pathogens in BacT/ALERT, BACTEC, and BBL MGIT media using polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer regions. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Apr; 54(4):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.11.002
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  43. Rabee AE, Forster RJ, Elekwachi CO, Kewan KZ, Sabra EA, Shawket SM, Mahrous HA, Khamiss OA. Community structure and fibrolytic activities of anaerobic rumen fungi in dromedary camels. J Basic Microbiol. 2019 Jan;59(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800323
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  44. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011 Dec 14;6(12):e27310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027310
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  45. Sirohi SK, Choudhury PK, Puniya AK, Singh D, Dagar SS, Singh N. Ribosomal ITS1 sequence-based diversity analysis of ana erobic rumen fungi in cattle fed on high fiber diet. Ann Microbiol. 2013 Dec;63(4):1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0620-2
    [CROSSREF]
  46. Söllinger A, Tveit AT, Poulsen M, Noel SJ, Bengtsson M, Bernhardt J, Frydendahl Hellwing AL, Lund P, Riedel K, Schleper C, et al. Holistic assessment of rumen microbiome dynamics through quantitative metatranscriptomics reveals multifunc tional redundancy during key steps of anaerobic feed degradation. mSystems. 2018 Aug 07;3(4):e00038-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00038-18
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  47. Wei YQ, Long RJ, Yang H, Yang HJ, Shen XH, Shi RF, Wang ZY, Du JG, Qi XJ, Ye QH. Fiber degradation potential of natural co-cultures of Neocallimastix frontalis and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium isolated from yaks (Bos grunniens) grazing on the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Anaerobe. 2016 Jun;39:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.03.005
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  48. Youssef NH, Couger MB, Struchtemeyer CG, Liggenstoffer AS, Prade RA, Najar FZ, Atiyeh HK, Wilkins MR, Elshahed MS. The genome of the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces sp. strain C1A reveals the unique evolutionary history of a remarkable plant biomass degrader. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Aug 01;79(15):4620–4634. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00821-13
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  49. Zhang J, Shi H, Wang Y, Li S, Cao Z, Ji S, He Y, Zhang H. Effect of dietary forage to concentrate ratios on dynamic profile changes and interactions of ruminal microbiota and metabolites in Holstein heifers. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 09;8:2206–2223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02206
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
XML PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

Fig. 1.

Venn diagram, rarefaction index, and abundance distribution curves for D, H, M and ZH based on OTUs from cattle breeds, which had ≥ 97% similarity.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle. Red line represents D. Blue line represents ZH.

Green line represents M. Yellow line represents H.

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

Fig. 2.

Composition of rumen fungi genera. Others represent the abundance of rumen fungi lower than 1%.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic tree. The tree was based on taxonomic information such as the abundance of all genera and the genera of corresponding OTUs based on taxonomic information from the NCBI database to reflect the diversity and community of rumen fungi of D, H, M, and ZH.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

Fig. 4.

Heatmap formed using the Bray-Curtis algorithm and the complete linkage method. The heatmap-plot describes the relative percentage of each fungal class within each cattle breed. Relative values for the fungal class are indicated by color intensity.

D – gayals; H – Yunnan yellow cattle; M – yaks; ZH – Tibetan yellow cattle.

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

REFERENCES

  1. Akyol, Ince O, Bozan M, Ozbayram EG, Ince B. Fungal bio augmentation of anaerobic digesters fed with lignocellulosic bio mass: what to expect from anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces sp. Bioresour Technol. 2019 Apr;277:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.024
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  2. An D, Dong X, Dong Z. Prokaryote diversity in the rumen of yak (Bos grunniens) and Jinnan cattle (Bos taurus) estimated by 16S rDNA homology analyses. Anaerobe. 2005 Aug;11(4):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.02.001
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  3. Bauchop T. The rumen anaerobic fungi: colonizers of plant fibre. Ann Rech Vet. 1979;10(2-3):246–248.
  4. Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10(1):189–197. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-189
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  5. Breton A, Bernalier A, Dusser M, Fonty GÃ, Gaillard-Martinie B, Guillot J. Anaeromyces mucronatus nov. gen., nov. sp. A new strictly anaerobic rumen fungus with polycentric thallus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990 Jul;70(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13974.x
  6. Brookman JL, Theodorou MK, Trinci APJ, Mennim G, Tuckwell DS. Identification and characterization of anaerobic gut fungi using molecular methodologies based on ribosomal ITS1 and 18S rRNA. Microbiology. 2000 Feb 01;146(2):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  7. Campa D, Tavanti A, Gemignani F, Mogavero CS, Bellini I, Bottari F, Barale R, Landi S, Senesi S. DNA microarray based on arrayed-primer extension technique for identification of pathogenic fungi responsible for invasive and superficial mycoses. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Mar 01;46(3):909–915. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01406-07
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  8. Cheng Y, Shi Q, Sun R, Liang D, Li Y, Li Y, Jin W, Zhu W. The biotechnological potential of anaerobic fungi on fiber degradation and methane production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Oct; 34(10):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2539-z
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  9. Dagar SS, Kumar S, Griffith GW, Edwards JE, Callaghan TM, Singh R, Nagpal AK, Puniya AK. A new anaerobic fungus (Oon tomyces anksri gen. nov., sp. nov.) from the digestive tract of the Indian camel (Camelus dromedarius). Fungal Biol. 2015a Aug;119(8):731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.04.005
    [CROSSREF]
  10. Dagar SS, Singh N, Goel N, Kumar S, Puniya AK. Role of anaerobic fungi in wheat straw degradation and effects of plant feed additives on rumen fermentation parameters in vitro. Benef Microbes. 2015b Jan;6(3):353–360. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2014.0071
    [CROSSREF]
  11. Deng W, Wang L, Ma S, Jin B, He T, Yang Z, Mao H, Wanapat M. Comparison of Gayal (Bos frontalis) and Yunnan yellow cattle (Bos taurus): rumen function, digestibilities and nitrogen balance during feeding of pelleted lucerne (Medicago sativum). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun 1;20(6):900–907. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.900
    [CROSSREF]
  12. Denman SE, Nicholson MJ, Brookman JL, Theodorou MK, McSweeney CS. Detection and monitoring of anaerobic rumen fungi using an ARISA method. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008 Dec;47(6):492–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02449.x
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  13. Elekwachi CO, Wang Z, Wu X, Rabee A, Forster RJ. Total rRNA-Seq analysis gives insight into bacterial, fungal, protozoal and archaeal communities in the rumen using an optimized RNA isolation method. Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 21;8:1814–1827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01814
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  14. Fliegerov K, Mrázek J, Hoffmann K, Zábransk J, Voigt K. Diversity of anaerobic fungi within cow manure determined by ITS1 analysis. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jul;55(4):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0049-y
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  15. Fliegerov K, Pažoutov S, Mrázek J, Kopečn J. Special properties of polycentric anaerobic fungus Anaeromyces mucronatus. Acta Vet Brno. 2002;71(4):441–444. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271040441
    [CROSSREF]
  16. Griffith GW, Callaghan TM, Podmirseg SM, Hohlweck D, Edwards JE, Puniya AK, Dagar SS. Buwchfawromyces eastonii gen. nov., sp. nov.: a new anaerobic fungus (Neocallimastigomycota) isolated from buffalo faeces. MycoKeys. 2015 Mar 04;9:11–28. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.9.9032
    [CROSSREF]
  17. Gruninger RJ, Nguyen TTM, Reid ID, Yanke JL, Wang P, Abbott DW, Tsang A, McAllister T. Application of transcriptomics to compare the carbohydrate active enzymes that are expressed by diverse genera of anaerobic fungi to degrade plant cell wall carbohydrates. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1581–1595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01581
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  18. Gruninger RJ, Puniya AK, Callaghan TM, Edwards JE, Youssef N, Dagar SS, Fliegerova K, Griffith GW, Forster R, Tsang A, et al. Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota): advances in under standing their taxonomy, life cycle, ecology, role and bio techno logical potential. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Oct;90(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12383
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  19. Haitjema CH, Solomon KV, Henske JK, Theodorou MK, O’Malley MA. Anaerobic gut fungi: advances in isolation, culture, and cellulolytic enzyme discovery for biofuel production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014 Aug;111(8):1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25264
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  20. Han X, Li B, Wang X, Chen Y, Yang Y. Effect of dietary concentrate to forage ratios on ruminal bacterial and anaerobic fungal populations of cashmere goats. Anaerobe. 2019 Oct;59(59):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.010
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  21. Hanafy RA, Elshahed MS, Liggenstoffer AS, Griffith GW, Youssef NH. Pecoramyces ruminantium, gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic gut fungus from the feces of cattle and sheep. Mycologia. 2017 Mar 04;109(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2017.1317190
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  22. Hanafy RA, Elshahed MS, Youssef NH. Feramyces austinii, gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic gut fungus from rumen and fecal samples of wild Barbary sheep and fallow deer. Mycologia. 2018 May 04; 110(3):513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1466610
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  23. Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lücking R, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol Res. 2007 May;111(5):509–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  24. Ho YW, Barr DJS. Classification of anaerobic gut fungi from herbivores with emphasis on rumen fungi from Malaysia. Mycologia. 1995 Sep;87(5):655–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1995.12026582
    [CROSSREF]
  25. Hooker CA, Hillman ET, Overton JC, Ortiz-Velez A, Schacht M, Hunnicutt A, Mosier NS, Solomon KV. Hydrolysis of untreated lignocellulosic feedstock is independent of S-lignin composition in newly classified anaerobic fungal isolate, Piromyces sp. UH3-1. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 Dec;11(1):293–306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1292-8
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  26. Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 2013 Jun; 7(6):1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.2
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  27. Joblin KN, Matsui H, Naylor GE, Ushida K. Degradation of fresh ryegrass by methanogenic co-cultures of ruminal fungi grown in the presence or absence of Fibrobacter succinogenes. Curr Microbiol. 2002 Jul 1;45(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-001-0078-5
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  28. Kameshwar AKS, Qin W. Genome wide analysis reveals the extrinsic cellulolytic and biohydrogen generating abilities of Neocallimastigomycota fungi. J Genomics. 2018;6:74–87. https://doi.org/10.7150/jgen.25648
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  29. Kittelmann S, Naylor GE, Koolaard JP, Janssen PH. A proposed taxonomy of anaerobic fungi (class Neocallimastigomycetes) suitable for large-scale sequence-based community structure analysis. PLoS One. 2012 May 16;7(5):e36866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036866
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  30. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Taylor AFS, Bahram M, Bates ST, Bruns TD, Bengtsson-Palme J, Callaghan TM, et al. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271–5277. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  31. Lee SM, Guan LL, Eun JS, Kim CH, Lee SJ, Kim ET, Lee SS. The effect of anaerobic fungal inoculation on the fermentation characteristics of rice straw silages. J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Mar; 118(3):565–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12724
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  32. Lee SS, Ha JK, Cheng KJ. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Sep 01;66(9):3807–3813. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.3807-3813.2000
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  33. Leng J, Cheng YM, Zhang CY, Zhu RJ, Yang SL, Gou X, Deng WD, Mao HM. Molecular diversity of bacteria in Yunnan yellow cattle (Bos taurs) from Nujiang region, China. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Feb;39(2):1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0848-5
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  34. Li XL, Chen H, Ljungdahl LG. Monocentric and polycentric anaerobic fungi produce structurally related cellulases and xyla nases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Feb;63(2):628–635.
    [PUBMED]
  35. Liggenstoffer AS, Youssef NH, Couger MB, Elshahed MS. Phylogenetic diversity and community structure of anaerobic gut fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota) in ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. ISME J. 2010 Oct;4(10):1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.49
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  36. Man B, Wang H, Yun Y, Xiang X, Wang R, Duan Y, Cheng X. Diversity of fungal communities in Heshang Cave of Central China revealed by Mycobiome-Sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jul 16; 9:1400–1414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01400
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  37. Mintz-Cole RA, Brandt EB, Bass SA, Gibson AM, Reponen T, Khurana Hershey GK. Surface availability of beta-glucans is criti cal determinant of host immune response to Cladosporium clado sporioides. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jul;132(1):159–169.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.003
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  38. Oliver JP, Schilling JS. Harnessing fungi to mitigate CH4 in natural and engineered systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Sep; 102(17):7365–7375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9203-2
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  39. Orpin CG. Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol. 1975 Dec 01;91(2):249–262. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-91-2-249
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  40. Ozkose E, Thomas BJ, Davies DR, Griffith GW, Theodorou MK. Cyllamyces aberensis gen.nov. sp.nov., a new anaerobic gut fungus with branched sporangiophores isolated from cattle. Can J Bot. 2001;79(6):666–673. https://doi.org/10.1139/b01-047
  41. Peng S, Yin J, Liu X, Jia B, Chang Z, Lu H, Jiang N, Chen Q. First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing. J Appl Genet. 2015 Aug;56(3):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-014-0258-1
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  42. Pryce TM, Palladino S, Price DM, Gardam DJ, Campbell PB, Christiansen KJ, Murray RJ. Rapid identification of fungal pathogens in BacT/ALERT, BACTEC, and BBL MGIT media using polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer regions. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Apr; 54(4):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.11.002
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  43. Rabee AE, Forster RJ, Elekwachi CO, Kewan KZ, Sabra EA, Shawket SM, Mahrous HA, Khamiss OA. Community structure and fibrolytic activities of anaerobic rumen fungi in dromedary camels. J Basic Microbiol. 2019 Jan;59(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800323
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  44. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011 Dec 14;6(12):e27310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027310
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  45. Sirohi SK, Choudhury PK, Puniya AK, Singh D, Dagar SS, Singh N. Ribosomal ITS1 sequence-based diversity analysis of ana erobic rumen fungi in cattle fed on high fiber diet. Ann Microbiol. 2013 Dec;63(4):1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0620-2
    [CROSSREF]
  46. Söllinger A, Tveit AT, Poulsen M, Noel SJ, Bengtsson M, Bernhardt J, Frydendahl Hellwing AL, Lund P, Riedel K, Schleper C, et al. Holistic assessment of rumen microbiome dynamics through quantitative metatranscriptomics reveals multifunc tional redundancy during key steps of anaerobic feed degradation. mSystems. 2018 Aug 07;3(4):e00038-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00038-18
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  47. Wei YQ, Long RJ, Yang H, Yang HJ, Shen XH, Shi RF, Wang ZY, Du JG, Qi XJ, Ye QH. Fiber degradation potential of natural co-cultures of Neocallimastix frontalis and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium isolated from yaks (Bos grunniens) grazing on the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Anaerobe. 2016 Jun;39:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.03.005
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  48. Youssef NH, Couger MB, Struchtemeyer CG, Liggenstoffer AS, Prade RA, Najar FZ, Atiyeh HK, Wilkins MR, Elshahed MS. The genome of the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces sp. strain C1A reveals the unique evolutionary history of a remarkable plant biomass degrader. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Aug 01;79(15):4620–4634. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00821-13
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  49. Zhang J, Shi H, Wang Y, Li S, Cao Z, Ji S, He Y, Zhang H. Effect of dietary forage to concentrate ratios on dynamic profile changes and interactions of ruminal microbiota and metabolites in Holstein heifers. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 09;8:2206–2223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02206
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS