An evaluation of design-based properties of different composite estimators

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Statistics in Transition New Series

Polish Statistical Association

Central Statistical Office of Poland

Subject: Economics , Statistics & Probability

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1234-7655
eISSN: 2450-0291

DESCRIPTION

6
Reader(s)
38
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 4 (August 2020) > List of articles

Special Issue

An evaluation of design-based properties of different composite estimators

Daniel Bonnéry / Yang Cheng / Partha Lahiri

Keywords : calibration, estimated controls, longitudinal survey, labor force statistics

Citation Information : Statistics in Transition New Series. Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 166-190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2020-037

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Received Date : 31-January-2020 / Accepted: 30-June-2020 / Published Online: 15-September-2020

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

For the last several decades, the US Census Bureau has been applying AK composite estimation method for estimating monthly levels and month-to-month changes in unemployment using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), which uses a rotating panel design. For each rotation group, survey-weighted totals, known as monthin-sample estimates, are derived each month to estimate population totals. Denoting the vector of month-in-sample estimates by Y and the design-based variance-covariance matrix of Y by Σ, one can obtain a class of AK estimators as linear combinations of Y, where the coefficients of a linear combination in the class are functions of the two coefficients A and K. The coefficients A and K were optimized by the Census Bureau under rather strong assumptions on Σ such as the stationarity of Σ over a decade. We devise an evaluation study in order to compare the AK estimator with a number of rival estimators. To this end, we construct three different synthetic populations that resemble the Current Population Survey (CPS) data. To draw samples from these synthetic populations, we consider a simplified sample design that mimics the CPS sample design with the same rotation pattern. Since the number of possible samples that can be drawn from each synthetic population is not large, we compute the exact Σ and the exact mean squared error of all estimators considered to facilitate comparison. To generate the first set of rival estimators, we consider certain subclasses of the broader class of linear combinations of month-in-sample estimates. For each subclass, when Σ is known, the optimum estimator is obtained as a function of Σ. An estimated optimal estimator in each subclass is then obtained from the corresponding optimal estimator when Σ is replaced by an estimator. Neither the AK estimator nor the estimated optimal estimators for these subclasses performed well in our evaluation study. In our real life data analysis, the AK estimates are constantly below the survey-weighted estimates, indicating potential bias. Our study indicates limitations of the approach that generate an estimated optimal estimator by first obtaining the optimal estimator in a class of linear combination of Y and then substituting in the optimal estimator an estimate of Σ. Any attempt to improve on the estimated optimal estimator in any given class would require a thorough investigation of the highly non-trivial problem of estimation of Σ for a complex setting like the CPS. We have not discussed this problem in this paper. Instead, we adapted the regression composite estimator used by Statistics Canada in the CPS setting. Unlike the estimated optimal estimators, the regression composite estimator does not require estimation of Σ and is less sensitive to the rotation group bias in our simulation study. Our study indicates that there is a great potential for regression composite estimation technique in improving estimation of both levels and month-to-month changes in the unemployment rates.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

BAILAR, B. A., (1975). The effects of rotation group bias on estimates from panel surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349), pp. 23–30.

BEAUMONT, J.-F. and BOCCI, C., (2005). A Refinement of the Regression Composite Estimator in the Labour Force Survey for Change Estimates. SSC Annual Meeting, Proceedings of the Survey Methods Section, (June), pp. 1–6.

BELL, P., (2001). Comparison of alternative labour force survey estimators. Survey Methodology, 27(1), pp. 53–63.

BONNÉRY, D. B., (2016a). R package CompositeRegressionEstimation. https://github.com/DanielBonnery/CompositeRegressionEstimation.

BONNÉRY, D. B., (2016b). R package dataCPS. https://github.com/DanielBonnery/dataCPS.

BONNÉRY, D. B., (2016c). R package pubBonneryChengLahiri2016. https://github.com/DanielBonnery/pubBonneryChengLahiri2016.

CASSEL, C., SÄRNDAL, C., and WRETMAN, J., (1977). Foundations of inference in survey sampling.

CPS Technical Paper, (2006). Design and Methodology of the Current Population Survey. Technical Report 66, U.S. Census Bureau.

FULLER, W. A. and RAO, J. N. K., (2001). A regression composite estimator with application to the Canadian Labour Force Survey. Survey Methodology, 27(1), pp. 45–51.

GAMBINO, J., KENNEDY, B., and SINGH, M. M. P. M. M. P., (2001). Regression composite estimation for the Canadian labour force survey: Evaluation and implementation. Survey Methodology, 27(1), pp. 65–74.

GURNEY, M. and DALY, J. F., (1965). A multivariate approach to estimation in periodic sample surveys. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, volume 242, p. 257.

HANSEN, M. H., HURWITZ, W. N., NISSELSON, H., and STEINBERG, J., (1955). The redesign of the census current population survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50(271), pp. 701–719.

JONES, R. G., (1980). Best linear unbiased estimators for repeated surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42(2), pp. 221–226.

LENT, J. and CANTWELL, S., (1996). Effect of Composite Weights on Some Estimates from the Current Population Survey. Proceedings the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 130–139.

LENT, J., MILLER, S. M., CANTWELL, P. J., and DUFF, M., (1999). Effects of composite weights on some estimates from the current population survey. Journal of Official Statistics-Stockholm, 15(1), pp. 431–448.

SALONEN, R., (2007). Regression Composite Estimation with Application to the Finnish Labour Force Survey. Second Baltic-Nordic Conference on Survey Sampling, 2.–7. June 2007, Kuusamo, Finland, 8(3): 503–517.

SEARLE, S., (1994). Extending some results and proofs for the singular linear model. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 210, pp. 139–151.

SINGH, A. C., KENNEDY, B., and WU, S., (2001). Regression composite estimation for the Canadian Labour Force Survey: evaluation and implementation. Survey Methodology, 27(1), pp. 33–44.

SINGH, A. C., KENNEDY, B., WU, S., and BRISEBOIS, F., (1997). Composite estimation for the Canadian Labour Force Survey. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 300–305.

SINGH, A. C. and MERKOURIS, P., (1995). Composite estimation by modified regression for repeated surveys. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 420–425.

YANSANEH, I. S. and FULLER, W. A., (1998). Optimal recursive estimation for repeated surveys. Survey Methodology, 24, pp. 31–40.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS