Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics, Transportation, Transportation Science & Technology


eISSN: 2300-861X



VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 (September 2017) > List of articles



Keywords : cost analysis, public transport, quantile function

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 103-111, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2017.12.3.10

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 11-August-2016 / Accepted: 29-August-2017 / Published Online: 25-November-2017



Summary. The aim of this paper is to develop a quantile method of cost analysis allowing identification of the most cost-generating malfunctions occurring in a fleet of public transport vehicles. The exemplification of this method has been performed for a fleet of a specified type of trams. The idea behind the quantile method of public transport vehicle operating cost analysis is the reversing of the accumulated function of costs, for the determination of which a cost database from a given operating time of a public transport vehicle fleet has been used. The paper presents data on the malfunctions from the first five years of operation of trams in a large transport company. The assumed time of five years results from the warranty period provided by the manufacturer. The recorded number of indexes of replaced parts was 547. The group contained inoperative parts that were renewed several times.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Barringer, H.P. A Life Cycle Cost Summary. In: International Conference of Maintenance Societies. Perth, Australia, 2003. P. 1-10.


2. Blanchard, B.S. Life Cycle Costing - A Review. Terotechnica. 1979. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 9-15.


3. Barringer, H.P. & Weber, D.P. Life cycle cost tutorial. In: Fifth international conference on process plant reliability. Gulf Publishing Company. Houston, USA, 1996. P. 3-1 – 3-58.


4. Garcıa Marquez, F.P. & Lewis, R.W. & Tobias, A.M. & Roberts, C. Life cycle costs for railway condition monitoring. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2008. Vol. 44. No. 6. P. 1175-1187.


5. Kumar, D. & Chattopadhyay, G. & Pannu, H.S. Total cost of ownership for railway assets: A case study on box wagons of Indian railways. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference. Gold Coast Australia, 2004. P. 8.5.1-8.5.15.


6. Tendayi, T.G. & Fourie, C.J. A life cycle costing framework for effective maintenance management in a rolling stock environment. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. 2015. Vol 168. P. 889-900.


7. Kumar, U.D. & Crocker, J. & Knezevic, J. & El-Haram, M. Reliability, maintenance and logistic support: a life cycle approach. USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2000.


8. Baaren, R.J. & Curran, R. How to improve operational availability and cost effectiveness using a pragmatic RAMS value driven design effort - A military helicopter case study”. In: Proceedings of the Third International Air Transport and Operations Symposium. Amsterdam, 2012. P. 27-35.


9. Szkoda, M. Analiza kosztu cyklu trwałości LCC w ocenie pojazdów szynowych. Seminarium SITK: Rynek lokomotyw – rozwiązania techniczne. Aspekty prawne i ekonomiczne modernizacji lokomotyw. Dobieszków, 2006. [In Polish: LCC analysis in rail vehicle evaluation. SITK Seminar: Locomotive market - technical solutions. Legal and economic aspects of locomotive modernization].


10. Strauss, P. Metoda analizy kosztów całkowitych pojazdu w okresie jego użytkowania. Technika Transportu Szynowego. 2000. Vol. 5. P.18-21. [In Polish: The method of analysis of the total cost of the vehicle during its use. Rail Transport Technology].


11. Kim, J.W. & Chung, J.D. & Han, S.Y. Life cycle cost model for evaluating RAMS requirements for rolling stocks. In: Computers & Industrial Engineering, International Conference on IEEE. CIE. Troyes, France. 2009. P. 1189-1191.


12. Seif, J. & Rabbani, M. Component based life cycle costing in replacement decisions. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 2004. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 436-452.


13. Durairaj, S.K. & Ong S.K. & Nee A.Y.C. & Tan R.B.H. Evaluation of Life Cycle Cost Analysis Methodologies. Corporate Environmental Strategy. 2002. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 30-39.


14. Jun, H.K. & Kim, J.H. Life cycle cost modeling for railway vehicle. In: International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems ICEMS. Seoul, Korea. 2007. P. 1989-1994.


15. Conradie, P. Exploring critical failure modes in the rail environment and the consequential costs of unplanned maintenance. CIE42 Proceedings, July 2012. P. 76-1 – 76-13.


16. PN-EN 50126:2002 Railway applications – The specification and demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS).


17. PN-EN 60300-3-3: 2006 Zarządzanie niezawodnością - Część 3-3: Przewodnik zastosowań - Szacowanie kosztu cyklu życia. [In Polish: Dependability management ‒ Part 3-3: Application Guide, Life Cycle Costing. Warsaw: Polish Committee of Standardization].


18. Młynarski, S. Problemy określania niezawodności w eksploatacji maszyn i pojazdów. Problemy Eksploatacji. 2003. No. 2 (49). P. 165-174. [In Polish: Problems of definition of reliability in machines and vehicles operating. Journal of Machine Construction and Maintenance].


19. Rymarz, J. & Niewczas, A. Ocena niezawodności eksploatacyjnej autobusów komunikacji miejskiej. Problemy Eksploatacji. 2012. No 1. P. 79-85. [In Polish: Evaluation of operational reliability of urban bus. Journal of Machine Construction and Maintenance].


20. Nowakowski, T. Problems of reliability modelling of multiple-phased systems. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2011. Vol. 4. P. 79-84.


21. Rymarz, J. & Niewczas, A. Ocena gotowości technicznej autobusów komunikacji miejskiej na przykładzie Miejskiego Przedsiębiorstwa Komunikacyjnego w Lublinie. Mechanika - Czasopismo Techniczne. 2012. Vol. 4. P. 195-200. [In Polish: Technical availability analysis of the city transport buses on the example of municipal transport company in Lublin. Mechanics – Technical Transactions].


22. Szkoda, M. Assessment of Reliability, Availability and Maintainability of Rail Gauge Change Systems. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2014. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 422-432.


23. Rymarz, J. & Niewczas, A. & Krzyżak, A.: Comparison of operational availability of public city buses by analysis of variance. Maintenance and Reliability. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 373-378.

24. Vintr, Z. & Vališ, D. Optimising Combat Tracked Vehicle Maintenance with RCM. Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces. 2013. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 116-128.


25. PRASA. 2010. Annual Report 2009/2010. Available at: https://www.prasa.com/Annual%20Reports/Prasa%20Annual%20Report%202010-11.pdf.


26. Nowakowski, W. & Szczygielska, A. Rola standardu IRIS w poprawie bezpieczeństwa transportu kolejowego. In: XVI Międzynarodowa Konferencja TransComp. Zakopane 2012 r. [In Polish: The role of the IRIS standard in improving rail safety. In: XVI International Conference TransComp].


27. Herrmann, C. & Kara, S. & Thiede, S. Dynamic life cycle costing based on lifetime prediction. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2011. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 224-235.


28. Marzec, M. & Uhl, T. Using data mining tools to show correlations between failures occurring in city buses. Diagnostyka. 2012. No. 4(64). P. 3-9.


29. Młyńczak M. & Pisarski P. Wspomaganie komputerowe w prognozowaniu obsług obiektów mechanicznych. In: Materiały XXXI Zimowej Szkoły Niezawodności. Szczyrk, 2003. [In Polish: Computer aided in forecasting the handling of mechanical objects. In: Materials of the XXXI Winter School of Reliability].


30. Niziński, S. & Żółtowski, B. Informatyczne systemy zarządzania eksploatacją obiektów technicznych. Bydgoszcz: MARKAR-B.Ż. 2001. [In Polish: Information management systems for the operation of technical objects].


31. Skotnicka-Zasadzień, B. & Biały, W. An analysis of possibilities to use a Pareto chart for evaluating mining machines failure frequency. Maintenance and Reliability. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 51-55.


32. Steinbrecher, G. & Shaw, W.T. Quantile mechanics. European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2008. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 87–112.


33. PN-EN 15380-4: 2013-06 - Kolejnictwo - System klasyfikacji pojazdów szynowych - Part 4: Grupy funkcyjne. [In Polish: Railway applications - Classification system for railway vehicles - Part 4: Function groups. Warsaw: Polish Committee of Standardization].


34. PN-EN 81346-1: 2009 - wersja angielska. Systemy przemysłowe, instalacje i urządzenia oraz wyroby przemysłowe - Zasady strukturyzacji i oznaczenia referencyjne - Część 1: Reguły podstawowe. [In Polish: Industrial systems, installations and equipment and industrial product. Structuring principles and reference designations. Basic rules. Warsaw: Polish Committee of Standardization].


35. Andrzejczak, K. Metody prognozowania w modelowaniu eksploatacji środków transportu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej. 2013. [In Polish: Andrzejczak, K. Forecasting methods in modelling the operation of means of transport. Poznan University of technology].


36. Młyńczak, M. Metodyka badań eksploatacyjnych obiektów technicznych. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej. 2012. S. 204. [In Polish: Młyńczak, M. Methodology of operational research technical objects. Wroclaw University of technology].


37. Projekt badawczy pt. „Wzrost efektywności funkcjonowania środków transportu publicznego w wyniku wdrożenia koncepcji LCC oraz RAMS zgodnych ze standardem IRIS opartych na zintegrowanym systemie informatycznym”. Nr PBS3/B6/30/2015. [In Polish: Research project “The increase in the efficiency of the public transport as a result of implementing the concept of LCC and RAMS compatible to IRIS based on an integrated IT system”].