SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Keywords : wage; driver; road transport; European Union
Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 145-153, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2019.14.2.13
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Received Date : 18-February-2018 / Accepted: 06-June-2019 / Published Online: 14-July-2019
The question of how to regulate the salaries of drivers working in the international road transport sector to balance the promotion of free movement of persons and the integration of the market with adequate protection of workers’ rights is rather complex. The range of problems of those seeking to ensure fair competition and fair treatment of employees arises from the fact that drivers operate across Europe but come from different countries where wage standards are significantly different, along with the working conditions. The paper addresses the issue of insufficient harmonization of social conditions in relation to the remuneration of drivers involved in road transport. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether there are differences in driver remuneration across the EU, even though they carry out the same transport within one EU territory as part of international road haulage. It also aims to identify whether there is a change in the terms and conditions of wage compensation over time.
1. Říha, Z. & Tichý, J. The Costs Calculation and Modelling in Transport, Transport Means. In: The 19th International Scientific Conference. 2015. Kauno technologijos universitetas. P. 388391.
2. Cruz, C.O. & Sarmento, J.M. Institutional "tetris" in infrastructure regulation: Harmonizing governance, regulation and policy-making in the transport sector. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 22-27.
3. Caplan, B. Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of judgmental anomalies from the Survey of Americans and economists on the economy. The Economic Journal. 2002. Vol. 112. No. 479. P. 433-458.
4. Burdzik, R. & Cieśla, M. & Sładkowski, A. Cargo loading and unloading efficiency analysis in multimodal transport. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2014. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 323-331.
5. Cyprich, O. & Konečný, V. & Kilianova, K. Short-term passenger demand forecasting using univariate time series theory. PROMET. 2013. Vol. 25. No. 6. P. 533-541.
6. Tanning, T. & Tanning, L. The Analysis of Labor Productivity in East European Countries. Tem Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 136-144.
7. Semeniuk, P. Economic protectionism in the European Union. Warsaw: Polish Economic Institute. 2019. 43 p.
8. Zhu, X. & Van, J. & Rietveld, P. Indirect benefits of infrastructure improvement in the case of an imperfect labor market. In: Transportation Research Part B-Methodological. 2009. Vol. 43. No. 1. P. 57-72.
9. Jurecki, R. & Stańczyk, T.L. Driver reaction time to lateral entering pedestrian in a simulated crash traffic situation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2014. Vol. 27. P. 22-36.
10. Pacáková, V. et.al. Štatistika pre ekonómov. 2003. ES VŠE, Bratislava. [In Slovak: Pacáková, V. et.al. Statistics for Economists].
11. Dorociaková, B. & Pobočíková, I. Zbierka úloh z pravdepodobnosti a matematickej štatistiky. 2005. ŽU Žilina. [In Slovak: Dorociaková, B. & Pobočíková, I. Probability and Mathematical Statistics Tasks Collection].
12. Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J. Overcoming automobile dependence. Sustainability and cities. Washington D.C. P. 442, 1999.
13. Rotondo, E. The legal effect of EU Regulations. Computer Law & Security Review. 2013. Vol. 29. No. 4. P. 437-445.
14. Domonkos, T. & Ostrihon, F. & Sikulova, I. & Siranova, M. Analyzing the relevance of the MIP scoreboard´s indicators. National Institute Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 239. No. 1. P. R32-R52.