MULTI-CRITERIA CHOICE OF THE REGION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LOGISTICS CENTER BASED ON AHP: CASE STUDY FOR KAZAKHSTAN

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics , Transportation , Transportation Science & Technology

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 2300-861X

DESCRIPTION

14
Reader(s)
28
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 (June 2020) > List of articles

MULTI-CRITERIA CHOICE OF THE REGION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LOGISTICS CENTER BASED ON AHP: CASE STUDY FOR KAZAKHSTAN

Aleksander SŁADKOWSKI / Bagdat TELTAYEV / Madina IZTELEUOVA *

Keywords : logistics center; transportation infrastructure; territorial location; priority field; AHP

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 119-131, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/tp-2020-025

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 22-March-2019 / Accepted: 09-June-2020 / Published Online: 18-June-2020

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

The current state of the regional market of transport and logistics services in Kazakhstan is characterized by a disparity between the increasing demand for logistics services and the lack of logistics capacity. In this article, the authors propose a method for determining the most promising areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the construction of a logistics center, based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

1. Acar, A.Z. & Gürol, P. An innovative solution for transportation among Caspian region. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016. Vol. 229. P. 78-87.

2. Rana, K. Transportation in Kazakhstan and its economic implications. International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 11-20.

3. Savy, M. Logistics as a political issue. Transport Reviews. 2016. Vol. 36. No. 4. Р. 413-417.

4. Guh, Yu-Yu. Introduction to a new weighting method — hierarchy consistency analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 1997. Vol. 102. No. 1. P. 215-226.

5. Saaty, T.L. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM. 2008. Vol. 102(2). P. 251-318.

6. De Felice, F. & Petrillo, A. Hierarchical model to optimize performance in logistics policies: multi attribute analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 58. P. 1555-1564.

7. Zhang, J. & Tan, W. Research on the performance evaluation of logistics enterprise based on the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Procedia. 2012. Vol. 14. P. 1618-1623.

8. Pham, T.Y. & Ma, H.M. & Yeo, G.T. Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to locate logistics centers in Vietnam: the logisticians’ perspective. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2017. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 211-219.

9. Saaty, T.L. & Vargas, L.G. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. 2012. 346 p.

10. Lubentsov, A.V. & Bobrov, V.N. & Desytov, D.B. & Noev, A.N. The advantage of the method of hierarchy analysis, the statistical methods of decision support. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1203. No. 012079. 7 p.

11. Saaty, T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process: the Organization and Prioritization of Complexity. 2nd Edition. Rws Publications. 2001. 376 p.

12. Saaty, T.L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd Edition. RWS Publications. 2000. 478 p.

13. Petroni, A. The logistics of industrial location decisions: an application of the analytic hierarchy process methodology. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2000. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 273-289.

14. Velasquez, M. & Hester, T.P. Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research. 2013. Vol. 10. No. 2. Р. 56-66.

15. Юганова, Т.И. Выбор участков для размещения объектов обращения с отходами на основе методов многокритериального принятия решений. Геоэкология. Инженерная геология, гидрогеология, геокриология. 2019. No. 4. P. 79–93. [In Russian: Yuganova T.I. Selection of plot for deployment of waste management facilities based on multi-criteria decision-making methods. Geoecology. Engineering geology, hydrogeology, geocryology].

16. Brzozowski, M. & Birfer, I. Applications of MCDM Methods in the ERP System Selection Process in Enterprises. Handel Wewnętrzny. 2017. Vol. 3(368). Р. 40-52.

17. Akcan, S. & Güldeş, M. Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: a Case Study in a Hospital. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2019. No. 5614892. 10 p.

18. Bhole, G.P. & Deshmukh, T. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and its applications. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET). 2018. Vol. 6. No. V. P. 899-915.

19. Amin, Md.A. & Das, A. & Roy, S. & Shikdar, Md.I. Warehouse Selection Problem Solution by Using Proper MCDM Process. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 43-51.

20. Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Statistics Committee. 2019. Available at: https://stat.gov.kz.

21. Киселёва, Г.В. & Кутьенко, С.Ю. & Жайлаубеков, М.А. Основные направления развития логистической инфраструктуры товаропроводящей сети Казахстана. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2017. Vol. 8(2). P. 330-332. [In Russian: Kiseleva G.V. & Kutienko S.Yu. & Zhaylaubekov M.A. The main directions of development of the logistics infrastructure of the distribution network of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research].

22. Союз транспортников Казахстана «KAZLOGISTICS». 2019. Available at: http://kazlogistics.kz [In Russian: The Union of Transport Workers of Kazakhstan "KAZLOGISTICS"].

23. Rakhmangulov, A. & Sładkowski, A. & Osintsev, N. & Kopylova, O. & Dyorina, N. Sustainable development of transport systems for cargo flows on the East-West direction. In: Sładkowski, A. (ed.) Transport systems and delivery of cargo on East – West routes. Studies in systems, decision and control 155. Cham: Springer. 2018. P. 3-69.

24. Stojčić, M. & Stević, Ž. & Nikolić, A. & Božičković. Z. A multi-criteria model for evaluation and selection of AGV's in a warehouse. Modern Problems of Russian Transport Complex. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 13-20.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS