SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 19-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/tp-2021-002
License : (CC-BY-4.0)
Received Date : 05-November-2019 / Accepted: 24-February-2021 / Published Online: 15-March-2021
Several abnormal driving behaviors in violation of traffic rules can be observed on the road network in Kuwait. These behaviors would likely hinder traffic flow and can worsen traffic congestion. These behaviors may also cause simulation model outputs to deviate from actual traffic conditions. Such aberrant behaviors have not been addressed in the literature, either in terms of the rate of occurrence or in terms of the factors influencing drivers’ engagement in these behaviors. This study sheds light on drivers' tendencies to engage in five maneuvers that fall into the category of behaviors that violate traffic rules and could have detrimental effects on traffic conditions in Kuwait. The tendencies of drivers to engage in such behaviors were elicited through selfreport questionnaires. The study found that a significant number of drivers in Kuwait display these driving behaviors. The effects of driver gender, driver age, and annual driving distance on the tendency of drivers to engage in such behaviors were investigated.
1. Cassidy, M.J. & Ananai, S.B. & Haigwood, J.M. Study of freeway traffic near an off-ramp. Transportation Research Part A. 2002. Vol. 36. No. 6. P. 563-572.
2. Daganzo, C.F. & Laval, J. & Muñoz, J.C. Ten strategies for freeway congestion mitigation with advanced technologies. Inst. Transp. Stud., Univ. Calif., Berkeley, CA, Calif. PATH Research Rep. Tech. Rep. UCBITS-PRR-2002-3, 2002.
3. de Winter, J.F. & Dodou, D.D. The driver behaviour questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Safety Research. 2010. Vol. 41. P. 463-470.
4. Edara, P. & Chatterjee, I. Multivariate regression for estimating driving behavior parameters in work zone simulation to replicate field capacities. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 175-186.
5. Frey, H. & Leth, U. & Mayerthaler, A. & Brezina, T. Predicted congestions never occur. On the gap between transport modeling and human behaviour. Transport Problems. 2011. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 73-85.
6. Gonzales, M.M. & Dickinson, L.M. & DiGuiseppi, C. & Lowenstein, S.R. Student drivers: a study of fatal motor vehicle crashes involving 16-year-old drivers. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2005. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 140-146.
7. Gowri, A. & Sivanandan, R. Evaluation of right-turn lanes at signalized intersection in non-lanebased heterogeneous traffic using microscopic simulation model. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 61-72.
8. Kaye, S.A. & Lewis, I. & Freeman, J. Comparison of self-report and objective measures of driving behavior and road safety: A systematic review. Journal of Safety Research. 2018. Vol. 65. P. 141-151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.012.
9. Kondyli, A. & Elefteriadou, L. Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas based on instrumented vehicle observations. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 129-142.
10. Koushki, P.A. & Ali, S.Y. & Al-Saleh, O. Road traffic violations and seat belt use in Kuwait: Study of driver behavior in motion. Transportation Research Record. 1998. No. 1640. P. 17-22.
11. Lajunen, T. & Corry, A. & Summala, H. & Hartley, L. Impression management and self-deception in traffic behaviour inventories. Personality and Individual Differences. 1997. Vol. 22. P. 341-353.
12. Lajunen, T. & Corry, A. & Summala, H. & Hartley, L. Cross-cultural differences in drivers' selfassessment of their perceptual-motor and safety skills: Australians and Finns. Personality and Individual Differences. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 539-550.
13. Lajunen, T. & Summala, H. Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation Research Part F. 2003. Vol. 6. P. 97-107.
14. Letirand, F. & Delhomme, P. Speed behaviour as a choice between observing and exceeding the speed limit. Transportation Research Part F. 2005. Vol. 8. P. 481-492.
15. Martinussen, L.M. & Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. & Møller, M. & Lajunen, T. & Özkan, T. Age, gender, mileage and the DBQ: the validity of the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire in different driver groups. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013. Vol. 52. P. 228-236.
16. Mesken, J. & Lajunen, T. & Summala, H. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation to accident involvement in Finland. Ergonomics. 2002. Vol. 45. No. 7. P. 469-483.
17. Mohapatra, S.S. & Dey, P.P. Lateral placement of U-turns at median openings on six-lane divided urban roads. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 5. P. 252-263.
18. Muñoz, J.C. & Daganzo, C.F. The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge. Transportation Research Part A. 2002. Vol. 36. No. 6. P. 483-505.
19. Oleckno, W.A. & Blacconiere, M.J. Risk-taking behaviors and other correlates of seat belt use among university students. Public Health. 1990. Vol. 104. No. 3. P. 155-164.
20. O’Connell, A. Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2006. 29 p.
21. Park, B. & Messer, C. & Urbanik, T. Traffic signal optimization program for oversaturated conditions: genetic algorithm approach. Transportation Research Record. 1999. Vol. 1683. P. 133-142.
22. Population estimates in Kuwait by age, nationality, and sex. 2018. Kuwait: Central Statistical Bureau. 2018. Available at: https://www.csb.gov.kw/Pages/Statistics?ID=67&ParentCatID=1.
23. Rowe, R. & Roman, G.D. & McKenna, F.P. & Barker, E. & Poulter, D. Measuring errors and violations on the road: A bifactor modeling approach to the Driver Behavior Questionnaire. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 118-125.
24. Stradling, S. & Meadows, M. & Beatty, S. Characteristics of speeding, violating, and thrillseeking drivers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Psychology. Bern, Switzerland. September 2000.
25. Sullman, M.J.M. & Taylor, J.E. Social desirability and self-reported driving behaviours: Should we be worried? Transportation Research Part F. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 215-221.
26. Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. & Eherenfreund-Hager, A. & Prato, C.G. The value of self-report measures as indicators of driving behaviors among young drivers. Transportation Research Part F. 2016. Vol. 39. P. 33-42.
27. Tanwanichkul, L. & Chaipanha, W. & Pitaksringkarn, J. Evaluation of effect of median U-turns on multilane primary highway capacity in Thailand through traffic micro-simulation models. Engineering Journal. 2018. Vol. 22. No. 5. P. 227-241.
28. Traffic statistics 2017. Kuwait: Ministry of Interior. 2017. Available at: https://www.moi.gov.kw/gdt/Statistics2.htm#.
29. Wu, W. & Liang, Z. & Luo, Q. & Ma, F. Game theory modelling for vehicle U-turn behavior and simulation based on cellular automata. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2018. Vol. 2018. Article ID 5972495. 12 pages. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5972495.
30. Zhao, N. & Mehler, B. & Reimer, B. & D’Ambrosio, L.A. & Mehler, A. & Coughlin, J.F. An investigation of the relationship between the driving behavior questionnaire and objective measures of highway driving behavior. Transportation Research Part F. 2012. Vol. 15(6). P. 676-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.001.