Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics, Transportation, Transportation Science & Technology


eISSN: 2300-861X



VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 1 (March 2021) > List of articles



Keywords : urban public passenger transport; walking distance; questionnaire; public transport stop; а priori ranking of factors; Kendall coefficient of concordance; dimensional theory; dimensional analysis

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 87-97, DOI:

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 29-August-2019 / Accepted: 23-February-2021 / Published Online: 15-March-2021



Designation of places for public transport stops is a key component of research on their accessibility. However, further research is needed to solve the problem with organization of public transport stops. This paper provides the results of an priori ranking analysis aimed at defining the most significant factors affecting the accessibility of stops and their scope. The proposed mathematical model, which uses dimensional theory, consists of two stages: pedestrians’ movement to a stop and passengers’ trip to a transit stop. It is a theoretical premise that allows to determination of placement of public transport stops considering the main indicators, which are the distance covered by pedestrians and the speed of public transport.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Можарова, В. Транспорт в Казахстане: современная ситуация, проблемы и перспективы развития. Алматы: КИСИ при Президенте РК. 2011. 216 p. Available at: [In Russian: Transport in Kazakhstan: current situation, problems and development prospects. Almaty: Kazakhstan Institute of strategic research under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan].

2. Promoting Clean Urban Public Transportation and Green Investment in Kazakhstan. Green Finance and Investment. Publisher OECD. Paris. 2017. 155 p. Available at:

3. Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at:

4. СНиП РК 3.01-01-2008. Градостроительство. Планировка и застройка городских и сельских населенных пунктов. Available at:;-240 [In Russian: Urban planning. Layout and development of urban and rural communities].

5. Abdallah, T. Sustainable Mass Transit: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Public Transportation. Elsevier: Amsterdam. The Netherlands. 2017. 218 р.

6. Profillidis, V.A. & Botzoris, G.N. Modeling of Transport Demand Analyzing, Calculating, and Forecasting Transport Demand. Elsevier. Oxford. 2018. 500 р.

7. White, P.R. Public transport: Its planning, management and operation. London: Routledge. 2008. 240 р.

8. Dewan, K.K. & Ahmad, I. Carpooling: A Step To Reduce Congestion. Engineering Letters. 2007. Vol. 14. Available at:

9. Gurmu, Z.K. A Dynamic Prediction of Travel Time for Transit Vehicles in Brazil Using GPS Data. Master thesis. University of Twente. The Netherlands. 2010. 67 p.

10.Lee, W.C. & Si, W. & Chen, L.J. & Chen, M.C. HTTP: A New Framework for Bus Travel Time Prediction Based on Historical Trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic InfOlwation Systems. SIGSPATIAL. 2012. P. 279-288.

11.Ivan, I. & Horak, J. & Zajickova, L. & Burian, J. & Fojtík, D. Factors Influencing Walking Distance to the Preferred Public Transport Stop in selected urban centres of Czechia. GeoScape. 2019. Vol. 32(1). P. 16-30.

12.Adams, E.J. & Esliger, D.W. & Taylor I.M. & Sherar L.B. Individual, employment and psychosocial factors influencing walking to work: Implications for intervention design. PLoS ONE. 2017. Vol. 12(2). Available at:

13. van der Veen, A.S. & Annema, J.A. & Martens, K. & van Arem, B. & Correia, G. Operationalizing an indicator of sufficient accessibility – a case study for the city of Rotterdam. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 1360-1370.

14.Sun, G. & Webster, C. & Chiaradia, A. Objective assessment of station approach routes: Development and reliability of an audit for walking environments around metro stations in China. J. Transp. Health. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 191-207.

15.Jang, S. Assessing the spatial equity of Seoul’s public transportation using the Gini coefficient based on its accessibility. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 2017. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 91-107.

16.Haitao, J. & Fengjun, J. & Qing, H. & He, Z. & Xue, Y. Measuring Public Transit Accessibility Based On Google Direction API. The Open Transportation Journal. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 93-108.

17.Besser, L.M. & Dannenberg, A.L. Walking to public transit: Steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005. Vol. 29. No. 4. P. 273-280.

18.Lemoine, P.D. & Cordovez, J.M. & Zambrano, J.M. & Sarmiento, O.L. & Meisel, J.D. & Valdivia, J.A. & Zarama, R. Using agent based modeling to assess the effect of increased Bus Rapid Transit system infrastructure on walking for transportation. Prev. Med. 2016. Vol. 88. P. 39-45.

19.Guzman, L.A. & Oviedo, D. & Rivera, C. Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. J. Transp. Geogr. 2017. Vol. 58. P. 236-246.

20.Wibowo, S.S. & Olszewski, P. Modeling walking accessibility to public transport terminals: Case study of Singapore mass rapid transit. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2005. Vol. 6. P. 147-156.

21.Ефремов, И.С. & Кобозев, В.М. & Юдин, В.А. Теория городских пассажирских перевозок: Учеб. пособие. Москва: Высшая школа, 1980. 587 p. [In Russian: Efremov, I.S. & Kobozev, V.M. & Yudin, V.A. Theory of urban passenger transportation. Moscow: Higher school].

22.Mavoa, S. & Witten, K. & McCreanor, T & O’Sullivan, D. GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography 20. 2012. P. 15-22.

23.Fransen, K. & Neutens, T. & Farber, S. & De Maeyer, P. & Deruyter, G. & Witlox, F. Identifying public transport gaps using timedependent accessibility levels. Journal of Transport Geography. 2015. Vol. 48. P. 176-187.

24.Durand, C.P. & Tang, X. & Gabriel, K.P. & et al. The association of trip distance with walking to reach public transit: Data from the California. Journal of Transport & Health. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 154-160.

25.Schlossberg, M. & Agrawal, A. & Irvin, K. & Bekkouche, V. How far, by which route, and why? A spatial analysis of pedestrian preference. MTI Report 06-06. San José, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute & College of Business, San José State University. 2007. 100 p.

26.Shang, H. & Sun, S. & Huang, H., & Wu, W. An extended dynamic model for pedestrian traffic considering individual preference. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2020. Vol. 106. No. 102204.

27.Hsiao, S. & Lu, J. & Sterling, J. & Weatherford, M. Use of geographic information system for analysis of transit pedestrian access. Transportation Research Record. 1997. Vol. 1604. P. 50-59.

28.O'Neill, W. & Ramsey, D. & Chou, J. Analysis of transit service areas using geographic information systems. Transportation Research Record. 1992. Vol. 1364. P. 131-139.

29.Zhao, F. & Chow, L. & Li, M. & Ubaka, I. & Gan, A. Forecasting transit walk accessibility: Regression model alternative to buffer. Transportation Research Record. 2003. Vol. 1835. P. 34-41.

30.Alshalalfah, B. & Shalaby, A. Case study: Relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristics. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2007. Vol. 133(2). P. 114-118.

31.Lam, W. & Morrall, J. Bus passenger walking distances and waiting times: A summer- winter comparison. Transportation Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 36(3). P. 407-421.

32.Kuby, M. & Barranda, A. & Upchurch, C. Factors influencing light rail station boarding's in the United States. Transportation Research Part A. 2004. Vol. 38. P. 223-247.

33. Abdulaev, E. & Makharatkin, P. & Pumpur, E. A priori ranking and an analysis of factors affecting tire wear. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 378(1). No. 012001. P. 1-5.

34. Akhmetshin, E.M. & Plaskova, N.S. & Iusupova, I.I. & Prodanova, N.A. & Leontyev, A.N. & Vasilev, V.L. Dataset for determining rational taxation value with incompatible criteria of economic efficiency and equity. Data in Brief. 2019. Vol. 26. No. 104532.

35. Szirtes, T. & Rózsa, P. Applied Dimensional Analysis and Modeling (Second Edition). ButterworthHeinemann. Burlington 2007. 853 p.

36. Gibbings J.C. Dimensional Analysis. Springer. London. 2011. 297 p.

37. Delaplace, G. & Loubiere, K. & Ducept, F. & Jeantet, R. Dimensional Analysis of Food Processes. ISTE Press - Elsevier. 2015. 356 p.