SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 135-147, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/tp-2021-066
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Received Date : 03-July-2020 / Accepted: 10-December-2021 / Published Online: 24-December-2021
Every year, on Polish roads, many deaths occur. In the best case scenario, only the vehicle is damaged. The number of road accidents is extremely high. Road safety is mainly affected by the reckless behavior of pedestrians at street crossings. Undoubtedly, road safety is an important issue. The aim of this article is to analyze the behavior of pedestrians at crossings and to evaluate the function of pedestrian crossings. For this purpose, a questionnaire study was conducted, in which respondents were asked whether they take precautions and whether they use cell phones at pedestrian crossings. Moreover, an assessment was performed of the safety of a selection of pedestrian crossings: whether they are well lit, and whether the respondents have been involved in a traffic accident. From the analysis of the survey, it can be concluded that the number of pedestrians taking precautions at pedestrian crossings averaged 86.46%; 25.69% of the respondents admitted that they have used a cell phone at a pedestrian crossing. In addition, the survey confirmed that the most dangerous pedestrian crossings are those that do not have traffic lights. It was also found that those who have a driver's license should actually be more vigilant at pedestrian crossings when driving.
1. Road accidents in Poland. Statistical report. Police Headquarters. Available at: https://statystyka.policja.pl/.
2. Linkov, V. & Trepacova, M. & Kureckova, V. & Pai, C.W. Novice Czech drivers’ ability and willingness to offer the first aid after traffic accidents: the positive effect of the first aid training. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina (Komunikacie). 2019. Vol. 21(2). P. 114-118.
3. Leśko, M. & Guzik, J. Road traffic control: controllers and systems of traffic control and supervision. Publishing House of the Silesian University of Technology 2020.
4. Witkowski, J. Pedestrian in road traffic. Publishing House of Communication and Communication. Warsaw, 1978.
5. Leśnikowska-Matusiak, I. & Dąbrowska-Loranc, M. Wychowanie komunikacyjne dzieci i młodzieży. Warszawa: Instytut Transportu Samochodowego. 2006. [In Polish: Communication education for children and adolescents. Warsaw: ITS Publishing House].
6. Celinski, I. Mobile diagnostics of vehicles as a means to examine and define speed limits in a road". Diagnostic. 2017. Vol. 18(1). P. 67-72.
7. Topolšek, D. & Pjsteršek, T.C. Do drivers behave differently when driving a car or riding a motorcycle? European Transport \ Trasporti Europei. 2017. No. 66. Paper no. 7. ISSN 1825-3997.
8. Golakiya, H.D. & Chauhan, R, & Dhamaniya, A. Evaluating safe distance for pedestrians on urban midblock sections using trajectory plots. European Transport \ Trasporti Europei. 2020. No. 75. Paper no. 2. ISSN 1825-3997.
9. Mohanty, M. & Samal, S.R. Role of young drivers in road crashes: A case study in India. European Transport \ Trasporti Europei. 2019. No. 74. Paper no. 1. ISSN 1825-3997.
10. Olegas, P. & Prentkovskiene, R. & Lukoseviciene, O. Investigation of potential deformations developed by elements of transport and pedestrian traffic restricting gates during motor vehiclegate interaction. Transport. 2007. Vol. 22(3). P. 229-235.
11. Olegas, P. & Sokolovskij, E. & Bartulis, V. Investigating traffic accidents: a collision of two motor vehicles. Transport. 2010. Vol. 25(2). P. 105-115.52.
12. Gianluca, D. & De`Luca, M. & Prato, C. & Prentkovskis, O. & Juneviciu, S.R. The impact of vehicle movement on exploitation parameters of roads and runways: a short review of the special issue. Transport. 2016. Vol. 31(2) Special Issue. P. 127-132.
13. Luke, R. & Heyns, G.J. Reducing risky driver behavior through the implementation of a driver risk management system. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management. 2014. Vol. 8(1)(a146). P. 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v8i1.146.
14. Driving school portal. Reflectors for vulnerable road users. Available at: https://www.portalnaukikuje.pl/aktualnosci/odblaski-dla-niechrononychucznikowruchu-road2152.html; 15.06.2021.
15. Gorzelanczyk, P. & Pyszewska, D. & Kalina, T. & Jurkovic, M. Analysis of road traffic safety in the Pila poviat. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 2020. Vol. 107. P. 33-52. ISSN: 0209-3324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2020.107.3.
16. Novales, M. & Bertrand, D. & Fontaine, L. A proposed new approach to light rail safety management in Spain and other countries. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 118. 2019. P. 740-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.010.
17. Djordjević, B. & Krmac, E. & Mlinarić, T.J. Non-radial DEA model: A new approach to evaluation of safety at railway level crossings. Safety Science. 2018. Vol. 103. P. 234-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.001.
18. Vaezi, A. & Dalal, J. verma M. Designing emergency response network for rail hazmat shipments under uncertainties: Optimization model and case study. Safety Science. 2021. Vol. 141(105332). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105332.
19. Duncan, D. & Klockner, K. Development of the contributing factors Framework interview guide (CFF-IG): All aboard the rail safety truth train. Safety Science. 2020. Vol. 129(104853). ISSN 0925-7535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104853.
20. Read, G.J.M. & Cox, J.A. & Hulme, A. & Naweed, A. & Salmon, P.M. What factors influence risk at rail level crossings? A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking, Safety Science. 2021. Vol. 138. Paper no. 105207. ISSN 0925-7535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105207.
21. Hadj-Mabrouk, H. Analysis and prediction of railway accident risks using machine learning. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering. 2020. Vol. 4(1). P. 19-46. DOI: 10.3934/ElectrEng. 2020.1.19.
22. Santarremigia, F. & Dolores Molero, G. & Poveda-Reyes, S. & Aguilar-Herrando, J. Railway safety by designing the layout of inland terminals with dangerous goods connected with the rail transport system. Safety Science. 2018. Vol. 110. P. 206-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.001.
23. Yan, H. & Gao, C. & Elzarka, H. & Mostafa, K & Tank, W. Risk assessment for construction of urban rail transit projects. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 118. P. 583-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.042.
24. Mchugh, K, & Llockner, K. Learning lessons from rail safety storytelling: Telling safety like it is. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 122(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104524.
25. City Hall. Our Pila. 2018. Available at: http://www.pila.pl/pl/nasze-miasto.html.
26. Babbie, E. Social research in practice. Warsaw: PWN. 2021.
27. Research sample selection. Available at: https://www.naukowiec.org/dobor.html.
28. Towpik, K. & Gołaszewski, A. & Kukulski, J. Infrastruktura transportu samochodowego. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej. 2006. [In Polish: Road transport infrastructure. Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology].